Photo of American Awareness

American Awareness's Blog

  • Welfare - A Malignant Cancer in America

    Current mood:mellow

    At one point in time, people in America knew that if they didn't pull their weight, they would not survive.

    It was a simple:
    Work = You could achieve the American dream.
    Don't work = You got exactly what you worked for, nothing

    Lazy people were weeded out rather quickly. That motivation doesn't exist anymore.

    It doesn't exist because that formula isn't valid anymore:
    You don't work = The government gives you a check.
    You work = You get taxed like a medieval peasant and have little left but the pride of your labor.

    While the hard-working honest American spends more and more time away from home to try and make ends meet, our hard earned paychecks are taxed more and more every year to support those who:

    Refuse to work
    Breed like rabbits and expect others to care for their children
    Are "disabled": alcoholics, drug addicts and those looking to milk the system after a minor injury.

    It is a point of great disgust and animosity among many honest, hard-working individuals to see how these so-called "poor" spend our tax dollars. New cars, gambling, jewelry, manicures; and no ground-round for them; only the finest cuts of meat make it into their shopping carts. It is the hard-working American supporting these slugs who are buying hamburger; we cant afford anything else.

    Healthcare?

    Many hard working people can not afford or do not have this basic necessity (now considered a luxury by many). But those collecting our tax dollars do, all the while putting a tremendous strain on the healthcare industry, which is why the working American can no longer afford this basic need, we have to pay for their healthcare instead.

    At one time, this social blight called welfare was intended for those who fell on hard times or those with crippling injuries. Sadly, these are the people who rarely qualify for this aid anymore. Instead, those with little more motivation than to hold out their hands are getting them filled with our tax dollars. We have became a society that rewards the lazy and unmotivated while punishing the hard-working and honest.

    It is disgusting to see our senior citizens who worked all their lives and paid taxes, or military veterans who have made this country a better place for all of us now forced to choose between their medications or food while the lazy are given both while offering nothing in return.

    It is time that these burdens on our society are treated accordingly. If you are an American who is too lazy to find gainful employment, then live with your decision and go without. If you are an illegal immigrant (all immigrants, not just Mexicans), pack your bags because you should be shipped back.

  • Immigrants, Illegal Aliens, Or Simply Criminals?

    Current mood:relaxed

    Below is an excellent article that I thought I would share with others who, like many Americans, are getting tired of the Illegal Immigration problem in the US.

     

    The issue currently tearing at the fiber of our nation is whether or not to allow new immigrants to enter and settle here.

    The reality is that the problem is not about immigration, nor is it about immigrants.

    The real issue is about the hordes of illegal aliens who are crossing our borders, without being checked for security or diseases. In this new age of global terror they are invading our nation and endangering the welfare and safety of American citizens.

    It's particularly unfair to let these illegal immigrants in because there is also an immense number of people who have legally submitted applications and are patiently waiting their legitimate admission to our country. These millions of law-abiding legal applicants possess the skills and the desires we want from our future citizens and will never get in if their places are taken by illegal immigrants.

    Some argue that the illegal border violators are actually doing us a favor by breaking our laws because the poor darlings are doing work that Americans are not willing to do anyway. But this conjecture is built on a complete lie, since it assumes that only the people who break our laws, and care nothing about our rights and the rights of those who wait to enter legally into the U.S., would take those jobs.

    While it is true that ours is a nation of immigrants, it is also, and foremost, a nation of laws. Illegal immigrants are nothing new in history; there are hordes of invaders who come from other lands, trampling the laws and the rights of every citizen of the place they decide to inhabit. Nothing can stop them; no wall can be high enough that they can't climb over, as it was proven in countless historic confrontations.

    Even the Great Wall of China didn't stop the Mongol invaders.
    Do we need more people in our country who ignore our laws, and truly believe that we owe them a living? During the recent pro-immigrant demonstrations these people spewed their hatred against the people and nation whose borders they invaded. There are those among our politicians who want to give the illegal aliens instant citizenship rights and also rights to their families to join those who already illegally forced themselves into our society. There are an estimated twenty million people that would be instantly added to our population.

    How can we shoulder this immense economic burden?
    We can't send the flower of our youth to faraway lands to fight for the sanctity of our nation's beliefs while at the same time leaving our land at the mercy of lawless colonizers.

    Illegal immigrants are not immigrants, as they do not want to join in our nationhood. These are invaders who with the encouragement of their government want to rob our nationhood. They do not want to adopt our culture and values; they rather impose their language, and their way of life upon us.

    As Congress today debates the right immigration policy to adopt, while some 12 million undocumented people live and work in our midst and boast and threaten us with their economic weight through politicians who vie for their votes, would be well to remember what
    America's past leaders had to say about immigration.

    None of our past leaders ever considered illegal aliens who got into our country by breaking our laws, as citizen material. They were considered criminals as far as Americans from other eras were concerned.

    Is it true that we cannot stop them from coming across our borders and that we can't do anything else but make them legal? This is a breach of our responsibility to protect our country and our citizens, as well as breaking our promises to all those millions of would-be immigrants from foreign lands who by playing within the rules, have applied to come into our country.

    Yes, we can stop them by cracking down on employers who hire illegal aliens, by deporting those who did succeed getting into our country illegally and charging the employers the cost of deporting them. Our government should serve notice to our neighbors that they are responsible for stopping the invaders from their side of the borders against our country, and we will hold them responsible through sanctions.
    In 1986, our great president Ronald Reagan wanted to solve the flow of illegal aliens into our country by offering a well-meaning, but in hindsight apparently naïve solution for the problem. He offered them amnesty.

    Now, 21 years later, we know that his plan didn't work. Our president and politicians now know that it didn't work … why not try it again … only this time it's over 20 million illegal aliens, and we can call it a Guest Worker Program? Maybe we can try it again in 20 years time, but with a hundred million aliens. We won't ever have to try it after that because we will no longer be America but only greater Mexico.

    We need to stop illegal immigration, not only because it's wrong morally and rewards force and obliteration of the law, but also because it demands a very high price from the national economy.
    Illegal alien invasion into the United States carries an extremely high price tag to the taxpayers. It is estimated that the average household of illegal aliens costs about $3,500 annually in services paid for by taxpayers. So, why are we engaging in this insane process of national self-destruction?

    Are we committing national suicide to satisfy the employer's greed for cheap labor and the politician's greed for picking up cheap votes to perpetuate their reelections?

    I hope not, because it is getting late to reverse this trend unless we start immediately!

    Don Winter, co-publisher, The Resident

  • The Anti-Death Penalty Hysterics' Newest Angel

    Current mood:amused

    Joseph Nagy had no entourage at his death. I have never seen a picture of him. I would not even know his name had I not found it in a court document. To the leftist legal class and the mainstream media that propagandizes for it, Joseph Nagy is just a background character, undeserving of focus or a name. In every story I saw last week, he was referred to as merely "a Miami topless bar manager," because that is what he was to the gang of armed robbers that shot him to death in December of 1979.

    Among this gang was Angel Diaz. Angel Diaz's death made international news. He died with an entourage of indignant activists and lawyers screeching like a chorus of over-educated harpies on his behalf before any camera or microphone that paused within their vicinity. I have seen many pictures of him, and his family, all of whom were there to tell what a victim of injustice the dark Angel surely was in his martyrdom for mere murderdom.

    An execution is always a joyous occasion for the sanctimonious leftist morality mill that seeks spiritual self-aggrandizement in the principled public defense of the indefensible. But Angel Diaz's execution turned out to be a grander stage than planned, because what was billed as a simple and boring lethal injection turned out to be a complicated and exciting lethal injection—the technician had to insert an IV needle twice. This meant there were not only two pinpricks into the outstretched arm of Diaz, but there was the remote possibility, if his anesthesia had worn off, that there was a burning sensation as well.

    This led one anti-death penalty physician to declare expertly, "It really sounds like he was tortured to death." And so the frenzy began, lethal injection—a method adopted specifically to assuage anti-death penalty activists who sued to ban hanging, shooting, gassing, and electrocution as too painful—was now itself a form of "torture"—cruel and unusual punishment. Within hours, a moratorium was declared on all executions in the state of Florida. And Angel was officially a purified martyr in the minds of the sort of deranged fools that, had they been witnesses to the crucifixion of Christ himself, would have looked past Jesus and wept solely for the thieves on either side.

    Worse yet, it now appears that "torture" (like "ironic," "literally," "fascist," and "imperialism" before it) has been added to the purgatorial ranks of words that have lost all real meaning through moronic misuse. I mean, it's literally ironic what torture these verbal fascists have committed with their legal imperialism.

    There are two key points of the new assault on lethal injection prompted by Angel's alleged agony.

    1) IV needles hurt—and often have to be inserted more than once.

    As someone who was once tortured by a failed and medieval IV needle myself, I can tell you that the pain was so unimaginable that I nearly complained the second time. No mere murderer should have to face that possibility—a possibility more likely than many know. One story cited the disturbing news that in a hospital setting it takes an average of 1.6 tries to successfully insert an IV into your average non-murderer.

    Now that sort of torture may be acceptable when we're just talking about old people, women in labor or little kids with inflamed tonsils. But what sort of people would allow an innocent killer of nameless bar managers to endure that? On the other hand, if 1.6 is the average then how is two tries a cruel and unusual act? Seems pretty usual to me

    2) If the powerful anesthesia were to inexplicably and suddenly wear off, then the lethal chemicals themselves might cause pain.

    It's true. Without anesthesia, most people report an increased sensitivity to pain. And knowing you were dying might be really scary—a fact that Joseph Nagy could probably shed some light on for us, were it not for the fact that he is still dead. In order to make the possibility that poor Diaz may have lacked for anesthesia more real and frightening, his entourage claims that for several minutes following his first injection, he may have done some or all of the following: "grimacing, blinking, licking his lips, blowing and appearing to mouth words."

    To me, that sounds like a perfect description of a man that was "feeling no pain." As a matter of fact, I remember seeing a stoner at a party doing just those things on an old couch once back in college, and he was definitely feeling no pain. That comment may seem callous, but hey, it's not like I shot an unarmed man to death during an armed robbery or anything. So relax.

    But let us suppose Diaz felt some pain through the haze of his drugs. Was that disproportionate to his offenses, i.e. cruel and unusual punishment? To answer that we need to look at his crimes.

    Unfortunately, we can't look at all of them because of the constraints of space in this column. But below are the highlights. (Keep in mind that most of the following somehow never made it into the "Green Mile" wannabe stories on Diaz's martyrdom.)

    In 1977, while serving a sentence for armed robbery in a drug rehab center for criminals in Puerto Rico, Diaz violated the rules of the center severely enough to merit his return to a standard prison. His innocent reaction to this was to murder Monsarrati Torres DiVega, the director that wrote up the report, by stabbing him 19 times while he slept. DiVega would have died of brain asphyxia following loss of blood circulation. Interestingly, that's the same way Mr. Diaz would have died following his lethal injection—except DiVega received no painkillers, so Amnesty International has no concerns that they may have worn off before his death.

    Being the 1970s, Diaz was sentenced to just 10 to 15 years for murdering DiVega. He never served even that though, since he escaped within two years by attacking a prison guard with a knife—something of a motif in his life.

    Soon after his escape, he moved to Florida and by his own admission was part of the gang that robbed the "Velvet Lounge" strip club. During the robbery, Diaz fired shots over the heads of terrified patrons and dancers, who were then herded into the bathroom and locked up. While imprisoned there, they heard screaming and gunshots—club manager Joseph Nagy being executed. They believed they might be executed next.

    The medical examiner reported that a bullet entered Nagy's chest and exited his back, penetrating the aorta of his heart and his lungs. In fact, the bullet seems to have penetrated much deeper than the horrible little needle that gives such woe to the poor little Angel's supporters. As with DiVega, Nagy would have died of brain asphyxia following loss of blood circulation—again, just like Diaz 27 years later. Only Nagy received no anesthesia, and so was unarguably distressed as he died in a pool of his own blood, fading into twilight while hearing his coworkers being terrorized at gunpoint by a band of murderous thugs. No lawyer was present. His family was not there to beg for his life. He did not have 27 years to argue his worth. And he had done nothing wrong, other than meet Diaz and his gang.

    After his arrest for Nagy's murder, (he was turned in by his frightened girlfriend) Diaz claimed in court that another gang member was the "real killer," but a blockmate testified that Diaz confided in him (while the two were planning to attempt an escape by killing a guard) that HE was the one who had shot Joseph Nagy. He also claimed in the conversation to have intimidated one witness into not testifying by firebombing her home. In a remarkable coincidence, one witness refused to testify, claiming her home had been firebombed.

    A jury considered the evidence, and after due process of law decided to deprive Diaz of life—a sentence that was blocked for 27 years by the tectonic court system and the advocates who game its idiosyncrasies to impose their will on society.

    To spare men like Diaz the pain of a needle prick, these advocates have the gall to claim that the death penalty must be prohibited by the courts. Should they get their way, one wonders how long these same lawyers could then stand seeing men like Diaz suffer the pain of life imprisonment. It seems there is always one more layer of pain to peel away for the criminal.

    None of us are guaranteed a painless exit from the world. Only in the rarified moral air of the murderers-are-martyrs movement could such a reassuring guarantee be the absolute and inviolable right of the executed.

    Denying society the benefits of deterrence and punishment for fear of a botched IV makes as much sense as denying it the benefit of hospitals for the same reason.

    Mistakes will happen; but the good news is, just like in the hospital, they can always be corrected with a second IV.

     

    by Mac Johnson
    Mr. Johnson, a writer and medical researcher in Cambridge, MA., is a regular contributor to Human Events.
    http://www.humanevents.com/ 

  • Judge rules state immigration rules are biased

    DENVER - A Denver District Court judge ruled Thursday that Colorado Division of Motor Vehicle rules requiring driver's license applicants to produce two or more documents to prove legal residence discriminate against the poor and cause undue harm.

    Judge Larry Naves granted an injunction that will prohibit the DMV from using the rules.

    The agency issued a rule on Sept. 6 requiring two forms of identification after the Legislature passed a law prohibiting state benefits for people who cannot prove legal residency in the United States. The rule has been modified several times since then.

    A group representing the poor had filed a lawsuit saying state law requires that agencies publish notice of proposed rules, hold public meetings on them, and then publish new rules in the Colorado Code of Regulations. None of those procedures were followed for the two-document rule, the lawsuit said.

    Naves said the rules denied legal residents their right to get a Colorado identification card or driver's license. Without one of those forms of identification, the suit alleged that residents don't have access to basics such as housing, employment and even auto insurance.

    The plaintiffs said many residents with numerous documents proving proof of residency, including U.S. passports, were told by the department their documents were insufficient, and they were denied licenses.

    AP 12-14-06

Login

Forgot password?

Need an account? Sign up