|
IV. CONCLUSION
Because Plaintiff has demonstrated a greater-than-negligible chance of success on the merits on claims involving registrations, I am enjoining Defendants from using the registered materials for the purposes specified in the registrations, namely on prerecorded compact disks, audio and video disks and cassettes as well as on any merchandise including T-shirts, hats, jackets and shirts. Because Plaintiff has demonstrated a lesser chance of success on the merits on claims not involving registration, and because the balance of harms tips in Defendants’ favor, Plaintiff’s motion to enjoin Defendants from using the name for live performances is denied. Finally, because there is no resulting harm to Plaintiff, its motion to enjoin Defendants from performing copyrighted songs is denied.
ENTER:
DATE: November 4, 2009
Basicamente:
Los Plaintiffs son: Aguila Records
Los Defendants son: Nueva Generacion, Martin Fabian y todos los Urbinas.
Conclusion del Juez:
Los Defendants no pueden grabar, vender, distribuir CDS, videos o cualquier material de merchandising como T-Shirts, caps, posters etc.
Los Plaintiffs o sea Aguila Records son los unicos que pueden grabar, distribuir, y vender mercancia.
Ambos grupos pueden seguir cantando y presentandose EN VIVO las canciones de ALACRANES MUSICAL aun cuando estas pertenescan a AGUILA RECORDS.
Los URBINAS SOLAMENTE EN VIVO.
AGUILA PUEDE GRABAR.
El juez dicta esta sentencia hasta que un jurado determine lo contrario.
El juicio incluyendo JURADO estara pautado para mediados a finales del 2010.
Muchas gracias,
IV. CONCLUSION
Because Plaintiff has demonstrated a greater-than-negligible chance of success on the
merits on claims involving registrations, I am enjoining Defendants from using the
registered materials for the purposes specified in the registrations, namely on prerecorded
compact disks, audio and video disks and cassettes as well as on any merchandise including
T-shirts, hats, jackets and shirts. Because Plaintiff has demonstrated a lesser chance of success
on the merits on claims not involving registration, and because the balance of harms tips in
Defendants’ favor, Plaintiff’s motion to enjoin Defendants from using the name for live
performances is denied. Finally, because there is no resulting harm to Plaintiff, its motion to
enjoin Defendants from performing copyrighted songs is denied.
ENTER:
James B. Zagel
United States District Judge
DATE: November 4, 2009
|
|
Online Now!
