AuntyBLAWGwar

----------------- Bulletin Message ----------------- From: GRISSAM'S SONG{"T5"MORE THAN READY!} Date: Dec 31, 2007 10:57 PM ----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: Evr Dance w Devil? CPS!! Vote RON PAUL 2008 !!!!!!
Date: Dec 31, 2007 10:10 PM


From: MAD-at-CPS
Date: Dec 31, 2007 9:22 PM


on MySpaceIM you can get it here www.myspace.com/myspaceim my username is madatcps

Child Protective Services are trained in Marxism and Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely. Yes, it does.

on MySpaceIM you can get it here www.myspace.com/myspaceim my username is madatcps

FW: Rousseau-- Read this response!.. wow!

Please forward: Please Post in your Bulletin.

Please join Legal Literacy Club.

Please make my friends your friends, too.

From: Victim of Title IV Gov Funding SOS ~SOS ~SOS~
Date: 31 Dec 2007, 19:01



Read this response!.. wow!


From: Eric Gallagher
Date: Dec 31, 2007 10:12 AM


You think you have it bad?

You are actually lucky that you only live in West Virginia!

Try living in Massachusetts!

In Massachusetts, the act of requesting copy of your local school budget, to the government, is considered an antagonistic and seditious act. I recall one news report about a year or so ago from the Boston Herald, about one such person who always attended the school board meetings, posing adverse questions about funding, who then ended up charged with child abuse by CPS, and then had his children adapted out to a gay couple.

Basically the only proof presented by CPS was the fact that they said so.

The judge decided in favor of the State, basically, because if the State says the world is flat, and you say, no the world is round, that constitutes proof that you have committed perjury!

There is a patent on the truth, and the government holds the rights to that patent.

It is as simple as that.

Something you said in your most recent posting gets to the heart of the issue.

You said that God gave your children to you.

That may very well be true, but that is not the truth held by all.

Others do not believe in God, they instead believe in the government, and to them, your assertion that there is an authority higher than the government, to them, is proof of your debilitating mental illness.

To them your children are not yours, all children belong to the State, and the State has the discretionary authority to take those children any time it sees fit, with or without cause.

Therefore, in the words of Rousseau, they have not only the right, but also the obligation to "force (you) to be free."

On man's freedom is another man's slavery.

If you have any chance to win this fight, what you need to do is remain calm, and not allow your emotions to control you.

Their strategy is to over time use the stress, pressure and your emotions against you, so to mentally break you, so they can then justify all that they have done, by discrediting you as a nut.

To them, there is no such thing as right or wrong, there is only public opinion, and if they can break you, and establish the public perception amongst your neighbors that you are a nut, then for them, there will never be any adverse political consequence for their actions, because your neighbors will either not care, or support the actions of CPS.

Do not fall into their trap.

What doesn't kill you makes you stronger.

You need to stay strong.

Either you have to control your emotions, or your emotions will control you.

The only chance you have of winning is to stay in control.

Either they control you, or you control them, and you cannot control them, if you cannot control yourself.

As I said they are trying to break you.

Either one of two things will happen.

They will succeed in breaking you, and you will lose your children, or they will not break you, and in time, failing in their objective to break you, and public opinion falling against them, they will eventually be overcome with frustration, and they will crumble, and you will, in the end, win.

You must stay strong.

You have no choice.

You must break them, it can be done.

Eric



Jail For Judges

MySpace IM you can get it here www.myspace.com/myspaceim my username is madatcps



As your New Years Resolution...




Christian Glitter by www.christianglitter.com





As your New Years Resolution...

Please work to impeach a corrupt ‘ADMINISTRATOR’... Judge or Public Official this year...

Please pass this New Years resolution idea on to all CPS Victims you meet.

judge the bench @ hotmail . com




Impeach Corrupt Judges Now - ( - K.I.S.S. HOW TO - )




LORD.OF.THE.JURY
Date: Dec 29, 2007 1:50 AM

More Funny Pictures at pYzam.com

on MySpaceIM you can get it here www.myspace.com/myspaceim my username is counsel_of_choice

Get Funny Pictures at pYzam.com

on MySpaceIM you can get it here www.myspace.com/myspaceim my username is we_recall_judge_horner

More Funny Pictures at pYzam.com

Here is what we have all needed to prove we do not have an advocate in the BAR Association.

RE: Get the word out!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Impeach Corrupt Judges Now - Bring Federal Charges

IMPEACH A CORRUPT JUDGE TODAY

MySpace Video Link: 'HOW TO'

How to write an Impeachment against a Corrupt Judge

Public Official: ):

FOR very simple ):

(--- (K.I.S.S. INSTRUCTIONS ----):

(--- copy -n- past LINK ----):

(--- http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=152020542&blogID=339554385&Mytoken=7C131F7A-CF7F-4512-9E7D6FBAE6D32C7D26051134 ---)

Challenge to Nancy Pelosi, Robert Wexler and Alcee Hastings

(EXTENDED COMPLAINT AGAINST FLORIDA PUBLIC OFFICES)

http://www.youtube.com/v/P6EWf1k6jDI&rel=1

Mark Foley, has drawn the attention of the Democrats and anyone who has the least knowledge of the Foley problems, no matter how inconsequential, if a Republican should, per many, resign from office. Some should. But this is small potatoes as it involves the failings of one man.

If these Democrats want to crusade on officials' federal crime, start with Florida and Palm Beach County which both Robert Wexler and Alcee Hastings represent and on the corrupt Florida Bar of which strangely each is a member (strangely as Robert Wexler has an impeccable record and Alcee Hastings is an impeached and convicted federal judge who was removed from office for taking bribes and corruption).

A considerable number of the Florida state representatives and state senators that I did not talk to for they cared not to learn of corrupt Florida judges, and did so en masse with no exceptions by party rule it seems, are now in the U.S. Congress, male and female.

It is now more than ten years since the first judicial failures in ruling against corrupt judges began.

It is well past time for an answer to be given.

See the other posts and write if you want to defend the canard that "Judges have absolute immunity" so get over it. That is false as we all know but act as if judges are untouchable.

Anyone may comment or write me at my Google mail,

fight.the.corrupt@gmail.com

but no one should just do nothing, for that is how we got to where we are as a nation---indifference.

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=IMPEACH+A+CORRUPT+JUDGE+&search=Search

(You Tube search info above)

(You Tube search title 'IMPEACH A CORRUPT JUDGE')



Yuwie

http://www.yuwie.com/yuwie.asp?r=268928&vid=1365498

Hit SIGN UP under the feet of Yuwie guy, enter your information, and verify your account with the link sent to your e-mail account.

Please forgive the advertisements and junk mail.

(Hit 'SKIP' at the bottom of the page or No Thanks)

Hit the back button to get out of pop ups




Did you know there was a CPS Class Action going on?
[DID YOU HEAR ABOUT IT ON THE NEWS?]

28 MILLION PEOPLE COMPLAINING

Polk County Circuit Court has over 70,000 complaints against the Dallas DHS / CPS Office.

That means the non-criminal prosecutor ( DA ) is not doing right by the people and SOCIAL WORKERS are getting away with 'murder' while judges and Attorneys look the other way.

This needs to STOP.

You need the CPS (free) HANDBOOK to help you understand what is going wrong. You need the CPS (free) HANDBOOK before the Child Protective Services knock on your door. They don't tell you your rights and neither do the POLICE. Get a Copy From (e-for-mation@hotmail.com)

ALSO AVAILABLE: Notice and Revocation of Power of Attorney.

ALSO AVAILABLE: NOTICE OF RESERVATION OF RIGHTS.

Because what you don't know can HURT YOU.

EXAMPLE:

Supreme Court said that you don't have to help DHS prove their case but judges punish you if you don't cooperate.

(That is a violation of Judicial Code of Conduct)



EXAMPLE:

America's Foster Care system is a quagmire that is spawning a generation of forgotten and forsaken children. Thousands are being neglected, abused, and even murdered under what is ostensibly government protection. - Time magazine, November 13, 2000.



EXAMPLE:

Did you know Attorneys work for the Court who appoint them first, THEN THEIR NEXT DUTY IS TO THE STATE OF OREGON, before you? That if you give up your Personam, have a Court Appointed Attorney 'Represent' your person, you become a WARD OF THE COURT, meaning Person of Unsound Mind.



~@~@~@~@~

If your friends or neighbors have a complaint please let them know about my web site. If you have a complaint you would like to post please send it to me to post on my blogs and send to the media. Also, please get a Yuwie account, too you can get you story posted in as many places as possible. My referral link to sign up http://r.yuwie.com/antigov


You tell your story, I'll tell you mine, and so forth. I have over 7,000 e-mail addresses I send Political Complaints to and will help you get a copy of a Federal Injunction.


Legal Literacy is my Blog topic on MySpace & Yuwie & are for the purposes of CPS REFORM.

I have a several study groups to promote Legal Literacy so citizens do not become WARD of the Court when in legal battles. Our families are not respected as an institution.



~@~@~@~

Find out about Child Protection Abuses of Power:


Blogs from MySpace are posted there.

Regarding Two Things:
http://www.yuwie.com/blog/entry.asp?id=268928&eid=136959



This is cruel this is usual.
http://www.yuwie.com/blog/entry.asp?id=268928&eid=136496



TAKING BACK OUR COURTS
http://www.yuwie.com/blog/entry.asp?id=268928&eid=136485



The Sheriff, not the judge, who is the chief law enforcement officer.
http://www.yuwie.com/blog/entry.asp?id=268928&eid=136484



Death Penalty is equal to Termination of Parental Rights.
http://www.yuwie.com/blog/entry.asp?id=268928&eid=136480



Immediate assistance needed to end this intolerable judicial corruption.
http://www.yuwie.com/blog/entry.asp?id=268928&eid=136471



It Is Time For A Change!
http://www.yuwie.com/blog/entry.asp?id=268928&eid=136469



Torture in an ice chamber at the Orange County Sheriffs Office.
http://www.yuwie.com/blog/entry.asp?id=268928&eid=136464



Is a judge god?
http://www.yuwie.com/blog/entry.asp?id=268928&eid=135484



BEFORE you sign!!!
http://www.yuwie.com/blog/entry.asp?id=268928&eid=132942



God hates the double minded. Please stand with God.
http://www.yuwie.com/blog/entry.asp?id=268928&eid=137864


~@~@~@~

I found the Emancipation Proclamation Petition over a year ago that is directed a reforming the Court Process.


http://www.PetitionOnline.com/families/petition.html

A link is posted on my Blogs please go see why you should endorse that petition. But, if you do endorse the Emancipation Proclamation Petition please include in your comment line 'Without Prejudice' UCC 1-308, which is very important.

We are not gaining momentum on that petition fast enough. But, there are sources in the media that are speaking the truth now regarding CPS abuses of Power.

Please help me get the articles posted on my Yuwie Blogs out to people. That truth will help promote the Emancipation Proclamation Petition.

I post stories about Child Protective Service abuses of Power & to help inform people about how to protect themselves. I will be posting Supreme Court rule decisions here that will help you understand how important Legal Literacy is.

I collect as many complaints as I can. Tons of these Political Complaints are posted on MySpace.

If you have not seen any of them please come here to get information.

To shed light on this topic please find people with CPS abuse / injustice problems and I will Post them here.


~@~@~@~


America's Foster Care system is a quagmire that is spawning a generation of forgotten and forsaken children. Thousands are being neglected, abused, and even murdered under what is ostensibly government protection. - Time magazine, November 13, 2000.

Real 'Life' drama, more 'Psychology the 'Wild Card'.


Please forward to any news station in Orange County California and to the Governor of California. (You Know Whom). Please help Julie get this exposed. Those judges need to know 'We the People' are paying attention'.

This could happen to anybody. It happened to me but not as bad. The DA just invented a future crime and took my daughter. The DHS still tried to take my grand baby with it and all the criminal charges I faced was dropped after I fired my Court Appointed Attorney and went right in there (communicating in the written format only) and made my own objections to the DA and told the judge he had a pre set disposition. I did better than the 'lawyer'.


Tomorrow we write the Federal Injunction for Julie A Witherspoon.

This is going on in California. Wickedness sheer wickedness in political circles. Reads like fiction. Torture lies, mother raped at the time of Sheriff contact while being searched, kidnapping, generals taking advantage of women who will not put up with bully tactics, a girl molested by the father’s circle of friends, (father also a child molester and working for the public school system even if the Court issued a finding that kids were in danger around him, ) A boy thrown to the ground by his throat after being seized by his IV in the hospital while protecting his mother. Veteran mother and children seized out of Germany Hospital. Kids put on a plane to America, mother put in the mental hospital at the orders of an evil commander who showed up at the hospital with a blank order and accused Julie of being suicidal when she was ill (her and her children hospitalized for he same sickness). She demanded a hearing and never got one. Her kids flown out of Germany to cause her to come here to fight for custody and win. Then her husband just drops the kids off at the Welfare Office and now they are going to be put up for adoption. (??????) The judge ignored all that. Julie is not going to kill herself, never was. Her commander just said at the time he and a conspirator took her, "You was drunk the other day and we are taking the kids". Motions to recuse the California judge are ignored and the Attorney who wrote the MOTION suffers retaliation from the bar. This Judge is in the same Masonic Order Julie Witherspoon's ex husband is a member of. (Her ex is a 33rd degree Mason).

The media will not believe it or cover the story. Now Julie has a (bogus) warrant out for her arrest for not following a pre-emptive court order to turn in her fire arm on false allegation rebutted by her lawyer and not pressed or reported to the police but called an eminent thereat (future threat against a 'foster parent' (the home where he daughter got raped in). (Julie was out of town when the allegation arose she threatened the Foster Mother.) The woman told a Case Worker (days later) and then recanted and said, "I can't recall that happened". The Bar is attacking and Disbarring one of Julie's Attorneys for trying to protect her from 'Hate Crimes' against her and her two children. Bureaucrat protection is not child protection but they use the Juvenile Process ( non criminal venue ) to pre convict on criminal offenses when that is a violation and a pattern and a practice in 'simulating legal process' against the right to the presumption of innocence when a crime has not been committed.

(Julie Fears For Her Life) She thought she was going to be killed when they put her in an ICE CHAMBER AT THE ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE after being labeled a Belligerent Claimant, because she tried to fire he Child Protective Caseworker with a SUBSTITUTION OF POWER OF ATTORNEY placing her Pen as her Children’s Voice.

When she comes to the courthouse to file with the Clerk they arrest her for trespassing. (Evil, sheer evil, She has tape-recording so all of it. I mean all of it. You will be a first hand witness to this corruption and know you would never want to be in any entanglement with our current judiciary. They are sheer evil and "Just say, "Yes, Massa" is all they think is a citizen response when the CPS knock.


Psychology the 'Wild Card'.


(If your or somebody your know is in a similar situation:)


You must file a Refute and Send in a Notice of RESERVATION OF ALL YOUR RIGHTS Pursuant to UCC 1-308, Get a Certified Copy of the Judges Oath of Office, Send in a Revocation of Power of Attorney. File a Federal Court Action based on violations of your Due Process Rights. File Criminal Charges on the Judiciary. GO PUBLIC. Select the applicable FACTS: Remain Silent and don't talk to the Judge!

If you’re interested in any of the other documents please request them.

Do not alter the format of the CPS (free) HANDBOOK.

Do not use it in MOTION FORMAT.

(There are very specific reasons why)

CPS (free) HANDBOOK Club has answers. Please join. It is free, too. (click the link)

Yuwie (link)

http://www.yuwie.com/yuwie.asp?r=268928&vid=1365498

Hit SIGN UP under the feet of Yuwie guy, enter your information, and verify your account with the link sent to your e-mail account.

Please forgive the advertisements and junk mail.

(Hit 'SKIP' at the bottom of the page or No Thanks)




Please Post your CPS Complaint in my Yuwie Club. I will send your story to the Media.

Example: Here is something I write, mail out and post.



You guys NEED TO GO IN THERE AND UPHOLD YOUR OATH OF OFFICE AND ARREST THAT JUDGE!!!!!!!!!


Bad Judges Have To Go



From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 12:35 AM
To: kmagdaleno@ocsd.org
Subject: Fw: From OCSD Internet


From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 12:27 AM
To: kmagdaleno@ocsd.org
Cc: madatcps
Subject: From OCSD Internet


Ben Brandzel, John Edwards for President..; Military.comSelect..; MilitarydotcomOfferCentermdc@epraponcha.com;
julie.a.witherspoon@us.army.mil;



Before You Sign. by !aLiBeRoNa!

There Is A Reason The System Does A Bad Job by !aLiBeRoNa!

'LONG ARM OF THE DHS': AS 'FELLOWSHIP OF THE DUPLICIT' 'in' 'LORD OF THE JURY' by !aLiBeRoNa!

INDEX OF MY BLOGS SO FAR. by !aLiBeRoNa!

Something is terribly wrong!!!! by !aLiBeRoNa!

Are Court Appointed Attorneys Fully Advised? by !aLiBeRoNa!

DEATH WATCH by Pamela

DEVON SCOTT DICKER by Pamela

Child Protection Services by Pamela

WARNING- Sexually explicite content, Adult Content, Adult Language. by Pamela

Orange County Sherrif - In the News by Pamela

Pattern at nonPractice in noncriminal lawlessness? by !aLiBeRoNa!

GOLDEN RULES of YUWIE SUCCESS by * Poldepc *

Things You Get Paid To Do At Yuwie by !aLiBeRoNa!

In contempt of the Constitution of the United States of America. by !aLiBeRoNa!

Are You Sleeping? Are You Sleeping? America? by !aLiBeRoNa!

We Want To Be 'King Of Yuwie Hill'...!!! by !aLiBeRoNa!

Do you deserve the Death Penalty... Did they give you a Grand Jury Indictment? by !aLiBeRoNa!

Eyes on Cild Protective Services by !aLiBeRoNa!

MySpace Mail For Julie Witherspoon by !aLiBeRoNa!

Andrew Jackson by !aLiBeRoNa!

Operation Slam Door on 'Child Protective Services' by !aLiBeRoNa!

God hates the double minded. Please stand with God. by !aLiBeRoNa!

Regarding Two Things: by !aLiBeRoNa!

This is cruel this is usual. by !aLiBeRoNa!

TAKING BACK OUR COURTS by !aLiBeRoNa!

The Sheriff, not the judge, who is the chief law enforcement officer. by !aLiBeRoNa!

Death Penalty is equal to Termination of Parental Rights. by !aLiBeRoNa!

Immediate assistance needed to end this intolerable judicial corruption. by !aLiBeRoNa!

It Is Time For A Change! by !aLiBeRoNa!

Torture in an ice chamber at the Orange County Sheriffs Office by !aLiBeRoNa!

Is a judge god? by !aLiBeRoNa!



December 11 12:38 AM
(http://judgethebench.spaces.live.com/)

mel me bleu
Glad to see people are coming together to stop government from coming into our homes and taking children under false pretenses. I have won my case, but I'm concerned that they may attempt to re-file.

On my own I will file an appeal to try and remove the dismissal WITHOUT PREJUDICE and request that the appellate court change the terminology to WITH PREJUDICE. I encourage all to look into coming together and filing a nation wide RICO lawsuit against the injustices in the justice system. Do Google searches on RICO's to understand more of what they are about.

Keep up the fight...

Wayde (California)

The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (commonly referred to as RICO Act or RICO) is a United States federal law that provides for extended penalties for criminal acts performed as part of an ongoing criminal organization. RICO was enacted by section 901(a) of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, Pub. L. No. 91-452, 84 Stat. 922 (15 October 1970). RICO is codified as Chapter 96 of Title 18 of the United States Code, 18 U.S.C. § 1961 through 18 U.S.C. § 1968.

It has been speculated that the name and acronym were selected in a sly reference to the movie Little Caesar, that featured a notorious gangster named "Rico." The original drafter of the bill, G. Robert Blakey, refused to confirm or deny this.[1]

Summary Under RICO, a person or group who commits any two of 35 crimes—27 federal crimes and 8 state crimes—within a 10-year period and, in the opinion of the United States Attorney bringing the case, has committed those crimes with similar purpose or results can be charged with racketeering. Those found guilty of racketeering can be fined up to $25,000 and/or sentenced to 20 years in prison. In addition, the racketeer must forfeit all ill-gotten gains and interest in any business gained through a pattern of "racketeering activity." When the U.S. Attorney decides to indict someone under RICO, he has the option of seeking a pre-trial restraining order or injunction to prevent the transfer of potentially forfeitable property, as well as require the defendant to put up a performance bond. This provision was placed in the law because the owners of Mafia-related shell corporations often absconded with the assets. An injunction and/or performance bond ensures that there is something to seize in the event of a guilty verdict.

There is also a provision for private parties to sue. A "person damaged in his business or property" can sue one or more "racketeers." There must also be an "enterprise." The defendant(s) are not the enterprise, in other words, the defendant(s) and the enterprise are not one and the same. There must be one of four specified relationships between the defendant(s) and the enterprise. This lawsuit, like most Federal civil lawsuits, can take place in either Federal or State court.


November 27 6:34 PM
(http://cid-8051be8e2048710c.spaces.live.com/)
August 24

The Ashwander rules: Qualifying for the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has developed seven rules, called the "Ashwander Rules" (Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority 297 US 288,346 (1935)) for qualifying a case to be heard there. According to Justice Brandeis: "The Court developed, for its own governance in the cases confessedly within its jurisdiction, a series of rules under which it has avoided passing upon a large part of all the constitutional questions pressed upon it for decision. They are:

The Court will not pass upon the constitutionality of legislation in a friendly, non-adversary, proceeding, declining because to decide such questions 'is legitimate only in the last resort, and as a necessity in the determination of real, earnest and vital controversy between individuals. It was never thought that, by means of a friendly suit, a party beaten in the legislature could transfer to the courts an inquiry as to the constitutionality of the legislative act.' Chicago & Grand Trunk RR v. Wellman, 143 U.S. 339,345.

The Court will not 'anticipate a question of constitutional law in advance of the necessity of deciding it.' Wilshire Oil Co. v. US, 295 US 188 'It is not the habit of the Court to decide questions of a constitutional nature unless absolutely necessary to the decision of a case.' Burton v. US, 196 US 283,295.

The Court will not 'formulate a rule of constitutional law broader than is required by the precise facts to which it is to be applied.' Liverpool N.Y. & P.S.S. Co. v. Emigration Commissioners, 113 US 33,39.

The Court will not pass upon a constitutional question although properly presented by the record, if there is also present some other ground upon which the case may be disposed of. This rule has found most varied application. Thus, if a case can be decided on either of two grounds, one involving a constitutional question, the other a question of statutory construction or general law, the Court will decide only the latter. Light v. US, 220 US 523,538.

The Court will not pass upon the validity of a statute upon complaint of one who fails to show that he is injured by its operation. Tyler v. The Judges, 179 US 405 Among the many applications of this rule, none is more striking than the denial of the right of challenge to one who lacks a personal or property right.

The Court will not pass upon the constitutionality of a statute at the instance of one who has availed himself of its benefits. Great Falls Mfg. Co. v. Attorney General 124 US 581.

'When the validity of an act of Congress is drawn in question, and even if a serious doubt of constitutionality is raised, it is a cardinal principle that this Court will first ascertain whether a construction of the statute is fairly possible by which the question may be avoided.' Crowell v. Benson, 285 US 22,62."

(-U. S.- ,82 L. ed. (Adv. 787), 58 S. Ct.-.)

Courts. § 377 – duty of Federal Courts to follow State decisions on matters of general law.

The Phrase “laws of the several states” in the provision of § 34 of the Federal Judiciary

Act of September 24, 1789, chap. 20, 28 U.S.C.A. § 725, that the laws of the several states, except where the Constitution, treaties, or statutes of the United States otherwise require or provide, shall be regarded as rules of decision in trials at COMMON LAW, IN THE COURTS OF THE United States, in cases where they apply, cannot constitutionally be construed as excluding in matters of general jurisprudence the unwritten law of the state as declared by its highest court. Swift v. Tyson, 16 Pet. 1 10 L. ed. 865, OVERRULED.

Common Law, § 2- of nation.

There is no Federal common law, and Congress has no power to declare substantive rules of common law applicable in a state, whether they be local or general in their nature, be they commercial law or a part of the law of torts. [See A. Jur. Title “common Law,” § 5: R.C.L. title “Common Law.” § 4.] Appeal, § 976- remand for further consideration- propriety………Etc. (this can be found in any university library) page 1487 & 1500.

NOTICE: there is NO “Federal” common Law, the law of torts are the same as in military courts, which also pertains to and is the ROMAN LAW OF TORTS! Roman Catholic Law of Torts, Tribunals!

THE CLEARFIELD DOCTRINE WAS RECORDED IN THE AMERICAN LAW REPORT OF 1938.

THE DOCTRINE EXPLAINS: ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY V. HARRY J. TOMPKINS.

United States Supreme Court- April 25, 1938

All courts in this State and every other State of the Union, operate under the "Clearfield Doctrine" from the case of Clearfield Trust Co. v. US, 318 US 363, (1943).

The definition of "money" becomes extremely relevant once the above is known and understood. So, the question is now "What is the substance of the money used by the government entity coming against you"? "MONEY" as defined in the Constitution for the several States united at Article I, section 10, clause 1 or "MONEY" as defined in the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) adopted by your states legislature? In Michigan, see Michigan Compiled Laws section 440.1101, et seq., under definitions. The UCC itself states that its definitions are controlling over dictionary definitions.

"Governments descend to the level of a mere corporation, and take on the characteristics of a mere private citizen ... where private corporate commercial paper [Federal Reserve notes] and securities [checks] is concerned ...For the purposes of suit, such corporations and individuals are regarded as entities entirely separate from government.
-Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States 318 U.S. 363-371. Bank of US v. Planters Bank, 9 Wheaton (22US) 904, 6L.Ed. 24


CLEARFIELD DOCTRINE [8]


http://216.109.125.130/search/cache?p=belligerent+claimant+in+person%2Bwithout+prejudice&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=FP-tab-web-t500&x=wrt&u=www.arkenterprises.com/dialch83.html&w=belligerent+claimant+person+without+prejudice&d=f5L4EyQ8NWGA&icp=1&.intl=us


To:_________________________________ Re:_______________________

From: ______________________________ Date:______________________


NOTICE OF RESERVATION OF RIGHTS

This document serves as notice to the court, and all officers of the court, and all other public servants, and all other people and persons that are working for, or on behalf of any public trust corporation, that I know that I have Rights that I can Demand to have protected at all times, both by the court and the police departments who follow its policies. This document serves as notice that I hereby reserve all my rights without prejudice and order all courts and related people and persons to recognize, honor, and protect All My Rights, both today, and forever, as is in accordance with the Constitutions. Furthermore, a Quo Warranto is placed upon all actions that are taken against me that might cause me a legal disability, be it now or at any time in the future.

This is official notice that I Reserve All My Rights Without Prejudice. I refuse this or any other court, public servant or person, the Right to take any liberties with my Rights. I do not consent in any way to have my rights infringed upon. I do not give permission to construe anything I say or do as permission to Prejudice any of my Rights. Any lack of knowledge of the Law on my part at this time relating to My Rights shall not be construed as permission to take any liberties with any of my Rights. Before God, I make and proclaim this statement of My Reservation of Rights as fact and order all public service people and persons to abide by it.

Any infringement upon my Rights shall serve as prima facie evidence of Intent to Violate the Law. If any action is taken against me that causes me a disability and it is later determined that said actions, lack thereof, or any part thereof, are based on policy and not Law, this document shall serve as prima facie evidence of intent to willfully violate the Law. Each violation of my Rights shall created a separate claim for damages, which shall be deemed immediately due and payable to the injured party.

The following are two STATE OF OREGON administrative laws relevant to rights violations by public servants.

162.355 Simulating legal process. (1) A person commits the crime of simulating legal process if the person knowingly issues or delivers to another person any document that in form and substance falsely simulates civil or criminal process. (2) As used in this section: (a) "Civil or criminal process" means a document or order, including, but not limited to, a summons, lien, complaint, warrant, injunction, writ, notice, pleading or subpoena, that is issued by a court or that is filed or recorded for the purpose of: (A) Exercising jurisdiction; (B) Representing a claim against a person or property; (C) Directing a person to appear before a court or tribunal; or (D) Directing a person to perform or refrain from performing a specified act. (b) "Person" has the meaning given that term in ORS 161.015, except that in relation to a defendant, "person" means a human being, a public or private corporation, an unincorporated association, or a partnership. (3) Simulating legal process is a Class C felony 162.415 Official misconduct in the first degree. (1) A public servant commits the crime of official misconduct in the first degree if with intent to obtain a benefit or to harm another: (a) The public servant knowingly fails to perform a duty imposed upon the public servant by Law or one clearly inherent in the nature of office; or (b) The public servant knowingly performs an act constituting an unauthorized exercise in official duties. (2) Official misconduct in the first degree is a Class A misdemeanor. All officers of the court and peace officers, such as the sheriff and deputies and all municipal private peace officers, such as all people hired for that purpose by a public corporation, such as City and State Police, are deemed to have a duty to know and uphold the law and protect the rights of the people around them.

Any violation of My Rights, or Failure to Stop Another from Violating Them, by a Public Servant Who Has the Legal Duty and Power to Protect Those Rights, Shall Constitute a crime. Such crime shall serve as prima facie evidence that said Public Servant does intend to, and shall, create claims on behalf of the injured party(s), for damages as follows; 1. $100,000.00 or the maximum allowed by the Administrative Tort Laws of this incorporated State against any applicable performance or security bond the Public Servant is operating under and, 2. $3,500.00 or the maximum amount allowed by
the Administrative Laws of this incorporated State in a Small Claims Court. 3. Said Actions Shall Create a Claim for Damages That Can Be Collected by Filing a Suit under the Jurisdiction of the Uniform Commercial Code for Violation of My Common Law Rights, in the Local or Federal courts. 4. It shall also serve as prima facie evidence that said Public Servant intends for the injured party to File Deprivation of Rights Suit, Directly in administrative (Federal) Court for the incorporated US Government for further redress of injuries. All claims shall be valid and enforceable simultaneously as allowed by Law. Authorities that have not been overturned: Norton vs. Shelby County 118 U.S. 425 An unconstitutional act is not Law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.

Owen vs. Independence 100 S.C.T. 1398 Officers of the court have no immunity, when violating a Constitutional Right, from liability. For they are deemed to know the Law.

Jackson, J., West Virginia State Board of Education vs. Barnette 1943 319 US 624, 638 87L ed 1628, 1638, 63 S Ct 1178, 147 ALR 674 "The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials, and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections." JONES V. COUNCE, 7 F3d 1359 (8th Cir. 1993) BENITEZ V. WOLFF, 985 F3d 662 (2nd Cir. 1993) Qualified immunity defense fails if public officer violates clearly established right, because a reasonably competent official should know Law governing this conduct.

United State vs. Johnson, 76 Federal Register, Supplement 538 Rights are neither accorded to the passive resistant, nor the person who is ignorant of his Rights, nor to the one indifferent thereto. It is a fighting clause. Its benefits can only be retained by sustained combat. It cannot be claimed by an attorney or solicitor. It is valid only when insisted upon by a belligerent claimant in person. "Without Prejudice" UCC 1-207.4 "All Rights Reserved" When I use "Without Prejudice" UCC 1-207 in connection with my signature, I am saying: "I reserve my right not to be compelled to perform under any contract or commercial agreement that I did not enter knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally. And furthermore, I do not accept the liability of the compelled benefit of any unrevealed contract or commercial agreement." "The Sufficiency of the Reservation: any expression indicating an intention to reserve rights, is sufficient, such as "Without Prejudice" (UCC-1-207-.4) or "All Rights Reserved." "the making of a valid Reservation of Right preserves whatever rights the person then possesses, and prevents the loss of such right by application of concepts of waiver or estoppel." (UCC 1-207.7)

This Document Is Law, and Must Be Obeyed by Anyone Who has a Public
Servant Job, and in Particular, Any and All Public Servants Who Have Taken an Oath to Uphold the Constitutions of this state and the united States but shall not be avoided for lack of an oath. Further Authorities: Whereas, the exercise of a natural right needs no authority in America other than the Constitution.

Whereas, Art. 1, Sect. 21 of the Constitution for Oregon, "...nor shall any law be passed, the taking effect of which shall be made to depend upon any authority, except as provided in this Constitution;...". Since this is the underlying principle of all American law upon which Accused is standing, the issue of lawful authority over the body and other properties of Accused cannot be ignored.

Whereas, Accused reserves all rights given him by God and protected by the Constitution for the Republican Union, and the republic of Oregon which places definite and unbridgeable limits upon the law making and enforcement abilities of any government body or corporate entity operating in accordance with and under color of American Law.

Whereas, if the STATE OF OREGON decides to mediate or decide the alleged claim against Accused, Accused reserves and exercises his sovereign power to demand that the STATE OF OREGON and JOSEPHINE COUNTY provide full disclosure of the source of the authority upon which all actions were taken. Full disclosure means; absolute in detail from its source.

Whereas, under American Law, the Accused recognizes that codes, rules and statutes are only administrative in nature and are not the actual Constitutional Laws with proper enacting clauses. Such codes, rules, and statutes, as applied as mandatory obligatory conditions to the Accused, in which the Accused is placed under a legal disability over the objections of the Accused, or thru fraud and deception, is an act of slavery.

Whereas, Accused objects to, and reserves the Right not to be subjected to slavery and reserves all Lawful Rights of redress for any act of slavery imposed upon their person and/or other properties.

Further Notice: Whereas, the STATE OF OREGON operates upon some other system of law other than the Constitutional Common Law in which Accused has Rights secure in the Bill of Rights, Accused demands to know the following: (A) Exactly what system of law is the STATE OF OREGON operating under, (B) What system of law is being used to limit the Rights of Accused, if different from (A), (C) What system of law Accused is being prosecuted for violating, if different from (A), (D) What system of law
Accused is being prosecuted under, if different from (A), and (E) How that system of law(s) apply to Accused, who understands himself to be a Man with all the Rights given him by God and protected by the Constitutions for the republic of Oregon and the republican union known as the United States.

Accused reminds the court that there is no "half-pregnant" in the law, and that to deny Accused access to the STATE OF OREGON's and JOSEPHINE COUNTY's law and thereby access to a defense, wherein an obligation such as a debt or service obligation is forced upon Accused is, in law, an act and declaration of slavery against Accused (42 USC, §1994 "...directly or indirectly, the voluntary or involuntary service or labor of any persons as peons, in liquidation of any debt or obligation, or otherwise, are declared null and void.")

Accused further reminds the court that pursuant to law, actors engaged in any form of slavery lose all immunities from criminal prosecution and civil judgments, and any corporation, municipal or otherwise, that condones any act of slavery by any of its agents or employees is subject to civil judgments under the law.

Relief Demanded:
If the court cannot, or will not comply with an American and internationally recognized 'in Law' and commercial law mandate for full disclosure, then Accused demands the court to dismiss its claim upon its own motion because JOSEPHINE COUNTY, thru its representative, failed to state a claim upon which Accused is obligated to grant relief and further failed to state a claim in a court of competent jurisdiction to grant obligatory relief.

Authority:
The Corporate State is moving in its own name in a criminal action and not Ex Rel on behalf of the People of Oregon under and in accordance with the common law.

In the mid 1990's, the State of Oregon, Inc., entered into a commercial enterprise with all of the other State of Oregon public corporations, such as the Oregon State Police, the Department of Transportation, SOSCF, etc. in which the retirement accounts/programs known as the Public Employee Retirement System, (PERS), were combined and invested in the stock market in a for-profit commercial enterprise. As a result: (A) The State of Oregon is no longer operating in its lawfully mandated role as a non-profit public corporation. (B) The State of Oregon judges and the State of Oregon
District Attorneys, court administrators, clerks, etc. all have an interest in maintaining the same retirement account.

Furthermore:
A percentage of every fine levied in Oregon, by a State of Oregon court, goes directly into the PERS account. As a result, the District Attorneys office and all of the State of Oregon judges, every Oregon State Police officer, SOSCF worker, etc., have a vested interest in assessing fines and using the State of Oregon's private corporate courts for finding people guilty, as they each acquire personal gain from every conviction.

And Finally:
A percentage of all fines go into the State of Oregon, Inc. general fund upon which the state plans its operating budget, and also, certain administrative agencies, such as the Oregon State Police, get a certain percentage of all fines placed directly into their operating budget.

Therefore:
The State of Oregon is involved in using its courts and jails as tools for an
extremely unlawful revenue collection and an undisclosed taxation system.

Accused states that being subjected over his express objections to such a system of codes, rules, statutes and the accompanying enforcement court system is an act of slavery.

Accused again notices everyone that he reserves the God-given and Lawfully protected Right that is endowed upon himself and all Mankind not to be subjected to slavery. Constitution for the united States Art. 3, Sect. 2, Clause 2: "In all cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be a party, the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction."

By____________________________________ Date:______________________
Raymond Ronald Karczewski©
Secured Party/Creditor/Holder in Due Course and Authorized Representative for the
Debtor/Defendant RAYMOND RONALD KARCZEWSKI©

Reply

8:17 AM | UCC CODE AND RULE 53 REFORM

Bad Judges Have To Go

From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 12:35 AM
To: kmagdaleno@ocsd.org
Subject: Fw: From OCSD Internet



Yuwie

http://www.yuwie.com/yuwie.asp?r=268928&vid=1365498

Hit SIGN UP under the feet of Yuwie guy, enter your information, verify your account with the link sent to your e-mail account.

Please forgive the advertisements and junk mail.
(Hit 'SKIP' at the bottom of the page or No Thanks)
Hit the back button to get out of pop ups

From: ON A MISSION
Date: Dec 28, 2007 2:14 PM


me getting this message was no mistake today! i have been sitting here all day wondering were to lead this woman too. i have suggested a pition and letters to someone higher than the jusde on her case please go to her page maybe you or someone u know can help her further. please let her know i have asked you to help!
regards, her url is

MySpace URL:

http://www.myspace.com/victimsofabuse


missy


From: LORD.OF.THE.JURY
Date: Dec 28, 2007 4:59 PM


IMPEACH A CORRUPT JUDGE TODAY

http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=152020542&blogID=339554385

Real American MySpace Blog

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=152020542

Child Welfare Topic Link to watch videos on

http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog&friendID=152020542&Mytoken=43E12C18-179A-42D5-84E2BD5A6378C61D46886807

I live in Portland Oregon. Hey!

IMPEACH A CORRUPT JUDGE TODAY

http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=152020542&blogID=339554385

Real American MySpace Blog

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=152020542

Child Welfare Topic Link to watch videos on

http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog&friendID=152020542&Mytoken=43E12C18-179A-42D5-84E2BD5A6378C61D46886807

I live in Portland Oregon. Hey!

From: MAD-at-CPS
Date: Dec 26, 2007 9:31 PM




Please click on the picture below to get to the petition site!

..


From: zen zeraman
Date: Dec 26, 2007 5:45 PM


From: MAD-at-CPS

RE: MAY GOD HELP US ALL

From: 9/11 IT'S TIME TO KNOW
From: Grandparents Have Rights Too! G.S.G.,, FLA.


Please click on the picture below to get to the petition site!



..


Please click on the picture below to get to the petition site!



..


Please click on the picture below to get to the petition site!



..


Please click on the picture below to get to the petition site!



..


From: Judge_the_Bench


Behold a Silent Scream



From: stephen a
Date: 21 Dec 2007, 06:01


From: Judge_the_Bench
Date: Dec 21, 2007 7:00 AM


Please Post and Re-Post [our] Silent Scream

[ Behold a silent scream! ]



Press Forward, get the code, cut & paste, put in your Bulletin, put on your comments, put on your profile