Hello, you either have JavaScript turned off or an old version of Macromedia's Flash Player. Click here to get the latest flash player.
Charity Watch's Interests
General
BE AFRAID! BE VERY AFRAID!
(that is what the CANCER BUSINESS wants)
The medical establishment regularly orchestrates campaigns of FEAR to keep the gravy train rolling yet they dangle the carrot of a 'miracle cure' constantly just out of our reach.
Well here's some news...they have known that cancer can be cured easily for over 100 years!!
Don't be afraid, get ANGRY! You are being duped!
THERE ARE LINKS ALL OVER THIS PAGE! (light blue/pink) CLICK ON THEM!
ARM YOURSELF WITH KNOWLEDGE!
"Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free."
Around the world cancer charities have become the most successful money collecting machines ever known. They would be quick to take the credit if we were winning the war against the disease.
So they - and the rest of the very wealthy cancer industry - must take the blame for the fact that we are failing. The cancer industry is failing because:
1)It seems it is no longer in the charities' interests to find a cure for cancer. Much of the money they raise pays for overheads and fat salaries. If cancer became an avoidable disease many people would surely be out of work for the charities would become unemployed.
2)The money is wasted on absurd research programmes (including pointless animal experiments)
3)Big charities refuse to spend enough cash on teaching people how to avoid cancer, on campaigning against environmental carcinogens or stopping the food industry selling so many known cancer-creating foods.
4)The cancer industry sometimes sneers at remedies which may work. A cancer charity attacked Dr Vernon Coleman's website www.immunesystem.co.uk though the advice it contained could save millions of lives. (Dr Vernon Coleman's main website is www.vernoncoleman.co.uk)
5)The cancer industry is funded by drugs companies. These are companies on the stock market which seek profit maximisation. It would NEVER be in the commercial interests of the drug companies to have less cancer sufferers.
Why do drug companies support cancer charities?
QUOTE>"Everyone should know that most cancer research is largely a fraud and that the major cancer research organisations are derelict in their duties to the people who support them"- Dr Linus Pauling (twice Nobel Prize Winner) (Page 1996)
" The "cancer industry", in particular patient groups, the charities and the pharmaceutical companies, are remarkably successful in their advocacy of increased funding of treatments which give patients little enhancement in the length and quality of life at high cost..
QUOTE>"But nobody today can say that one does not know what cancer and its prime cause be. On the contrary, there is no disease whose prime cause is better known, so that today ignorance is no longer an excuse that one cannot do more about prevention. That prevention of cancer will come there is no doubt, for man wishes to survive. But how long prevention will be avoided depends on how long the prophets of agnosticism will succeed in inhibiting the application of scientific knowledge in the cancer field. In the meantime, millions of men must die of cancer unnecessarily."
Nobel Prize Winner Otto Warburg
One of the best cancer policies remains prevention, in particular reduced use of tobacco.
However, investing in this policy does not benefit government, the pharmaceutical industry, the cancer charities or unfortunate patients already damaged by their addiction to cigarettes - or "cancer sticks" ".
-Prof Alan Maynard, York health policy group, University of York (Tuesday August 6, 2002 - Letter to The Guardian newspaper)
,b>We all want to find cures for disease and ease human suffering, but did you know that some health charities may use your donation to fund animal experiments?
Probably not, as most are not keen to publicise their animal testing work. When supermarkets, newspapers or other companies support animal testing health charities with high-profile promotions or customer campaigns, they rarely if ever tell the public that their money may go towards animal experiments.
Think Before You Give aims to give ethical consumers the opportunity to make a difference by asking these companies to stop supporting animal testing or give their customers an ethical, non-animal testing alternative. For example, following reader complaints, The Times newspaper recently agreed to divert donations from ‘opt out’ readers from Cancer Research UK to the Dr Hadwen Trust. You can make a difference – simply follow the steps below and help promote non-animal medical research.
Step 1
Charities Guide If you spot an animal-testing health charity being promoted by a supermarket, newspaper or other company, check it out to make sure it really is an animal-tester. Click the guinea pig for a quick guide to charities.
Step 2 Click here and let the Dr Hadwen Trust know about the promotion – it may not always be possible but we will aim to contact the company about the Think Before You Give initiative. We’ll ask them to give customers an ethical choice when considering corporate donations or promotions, and propose three options:
* Introduce a non-animal research policy for all future charity promotions (see the blog on WHY animal experiments are worse than useless).
* Commit to a percentage of future charity promotions being non-animal research
* Commit to always offering customers a choice so that whenever the company supports a charity that tests on animals, its customers are informed and given a clear choice to ‘op-out’ and divert their personal contribution to an alternative non-animal research charity instead.
Step 3
Write to the company yourself and encourage others to do so. It is important that the company hears from members of the public who do not wish to support animal suffering. Keep your calls / letters / emails brief and polite, and encourage them to contact us here at the Dr Hadwen Trust to discuss an alternative approach that supports medical research but without animal experiments. "A great deal of money and energy is put into pressing politicians for change, but politicians will never concede more than the wider public consensus positively wants. Consequently, the political arena is a waste of time
and money. The real wellsprings of change lie outside of the political arena. Politicians do respond to the mood of the public; that is, to what the widely-shared perception is. If they do not respond, they would become unpopular. Public perception is ultimately the deciding factor."
"The general public is unaware of unconventional thinking about the cause of cancer and its prevention. If the public perception flip-flopped over, then vivisection for cancer research would look irrelevant. The motives of the cancer researchers would then look questionable."
All those people walking into cancer charity shops, giving donations to street collectors or for fund-raising events - they have not rejected the alternative view of cancer, they have never even heard it.
Far and away the biggest causes of cancer are known.
In order: firstly chemical pollution; then smoking; refined carbohydrates; saturated fat and unsaturated fat; sugar; salt; lack of exercise. The World Cancer Research
Fund says that one third of cancer is down to diet alone. That is not counting in the cancerous effects of toxins in factory-farmed meat; the growth-promoting hormones, antibiotics, nitrates and concentrated pesticides from feed.
First let people eliminate the known causes of cancer, and then let us see how many cancers remain and research those ones."
Acknowledgments to Mark Kinzley (excerpted from ‘uncaged’ article, Autumn 1999)
What you choose to eat
has a major impact on your risk of developing major diseases such as cancer, atherosclerosis, obesity and diabetes, according to Dr. R. Deckelbaum of the American Heart Association’s Nutrition Committee.
An estimated one-third of the annual cancer deaths in the US is related to an unhealthy diet. Simply changing the way we eat can change that statistic.
Based on the top nutritional and health experts’ conclusions, the high saturated fat content of animal -derived foods is one of the major causes of heart diseases, cancer, strokes, diabetes, obesity, etc. These major
chronic diseases kill 1.4 million American lives each year (which is more than two thirds of all the deaths in the US) and $250 billion in medical costs and production losses annually The Cancer Research UK fund-raising syndicate is clawing in over £250 million each year. The highly-paid PR spivs, administrators, organisers, commission-paid agents... aided by an army of semi-conscious supporters, many of whom have seen their relatives and friends destroyed by the treatments produced by the very same organisations that they are supporting have created by far the biggest fraud, medical or otherwise, in history.
'...still the money pours in for "Cancer Research" from kind-hearted, well-meaning people in spite of the fact that the much-advertised "cures" and "discoveries" invariably turn out, year after year, to be no cure at all but rather an aggravation of the trouble, the proof of this being the steady increase of the disease on all sides...
Surely there should be some result to show as a partial excuse for the torturing of so many animals...the public still does not realise that nothing is likely to happen, no progress ever likely or even possible whilst the research is done on demonstrably wrong lines.'
Morley Steynor - 1940
Since these words, countless billions of pounds/dollars/animals have been squandered; whilst the disease has steadily reached the point of seriously threatening the continuation of the human species. Clearly, even given the level of intelligence of the research laboratory inmates, the situation could not possibly be explained by sheer, crass stupidity alone.
Animal research plays a major part in the global scam: 800 ways have been found to artificially induce tumours in animals; not one with an atom of relevance to spontaneously occurring cancer in humans.
Dr Linus Pauling, double Nobel Laureate, declared: 'Everyone should know that the "War on Cancer" is, largely, a fraud.'There are many nontoxic, noninvasive treatments for cancer, particularly nutrition-related treatments.
Unfortunately, these methods are often suppressed by proponents of the more lucrative, "traditional" cancer therapies, i.e., those that involve the production and sale of drugs. Dr. Linus Pauling, a two-time Nobel Prize winner, stated that "a new idea has not been allowed into this system in 20 years" because of the influences of vested interest groups.
After spending decades researching cancer survival statistics, Dr. Hardin Jones, professor of medical physics and physiology at the University of California at Berkeley, came to this unexpected conclusion: "My studies have proven conclusively that untreated cancer victims usually live up to four times longer than treated individuals." Clearly, our medical system must go beyond archaic animal studies and focus its attention on more sophisticated, human-based technologies and emphasize programs designed to prevent cancer altogether.
What You Can Do
Take responsibility for your health and avoid carcinogens. Stay away from animal-based foods (meat, eggs, and dairy products), tobacco, excessive radiation, artificial food additives and colorings, and pesticides. Have your tap water tested for possible chemical contamination, and test your house for radon gas. Urge your state and federal legislators and government agencies to crack down on soil and air pollution.
Encourage medical charities and research agencies to develop and use clinical, epidemiological, and other non-animal research methods. If you donate to medical charities, write, "Not to be used for animal studies," on your cheques. Educate others about cancer prevention and help stop the nation's No. 2 killer before it strikes.
Who I'd like to meet: PLEASE SEE THE LINKS AT THE BOTTOM OF BOTH SECTIONS FOR VIDEO'S AND ARTICLES ON CANCER AND HOW YOU CAN HELP YOURSELVES AND YOUR LOVED ONES.
Cancer research is not what it pretends to be. Cancer is now a business. We are REAL people who have suffered the loss of family and friends and we won't stand for it any longer.
Throwing money at cancer research is not the answer. It may make you feel better, as if you have done something, but ask yourself this.
Before they started trading as "Cancer Research UK" the Imperial Cancer Research Fund and the Cancer Research Campaign had around 170 years of fundraising between them. When they started, cancer was a rare disease.
Now it is an out-of-control epidemic: 40% - and rising - of the UK population have, or will develop cancer: a rate expected to rise by 50% by 2020.
CRUK are collecting over £350,000,000 per year, none of which will be spent on research into safe, effective treatments. CRUK will not fund any research which is a threat to
The Cancer Business.
Dr Lorraine Day on why we get cancer and how to treat it. Dr. Lorraine Day reversed her severe, advanced cancer by rebuilding her immune system by natural therapies, so her body could heal itself.
Dr. Day is an internationally acclaimed orthopedic trauma surgeon and best selling author who was for 15 years on the faculty of the University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine as Associate Professor and Vice Chairman of the Department of Orthopedics. She was also Chief of Orthopedic Surgery at San Francisco General Hospital and is recognized world-wide as an AIDS expert.
A SOLUTION TO CANCER WOULD MEAN THE TERMINATION OF RESEARCH PROGRAMMES,THE OBSOLESCENCE OF SKILLS, THE END OF DREAMS OF PERSONAL GLORY.
QUOTE>"Chemotherapy is an incredibly lucrative business for doctors, hospitals, and pharmaceutical companies…..The medical establishment wants everyone to follow the same exact protocol. They don’t want to see the chemotherapy industry go under, and that’s the number one obstacle to any progress in oncology."
Dr Warner, M.D.
"TRIUMPH OVER CANCER WOULD DRY UP CONTRIBUTIONS TO SELF-PERPETUATING CHARITIES...IT WOULD MORTALLY THREATEN THE PRESENT CLINICAL ESTABLISHMENT BY RENDERING OBSOLETE THE EXPENSIVE SURGICAL,RADIOLOGICAL AND CHEMOTHERAPEUTIC TREATMENTS IN WHICH SO MUCH MONEY,TRAINING AND EQUIPMENT IS INVESTED...THE NEW THERAPY MUST BE DISBELIEVED, DENIED, DISCOURAGED AND DISALLOWED AT ALL COSTS,REGARDLESS OF ACTUAL TESTING RESULTS AND, PREFERABLY, WITHOUT ANY TESTING AT ALL." - The Houston/Null Analysis.
QUOTE>"To the cancer establishment, a cancer patient is a profit center. The actual clinical and scientific evidence does not support the claims of the cancer industry. Conventional cancer treatments are in place as the law of the land because they pay, not heal, the best. Decades of the politics-of-cancer-as-usual have kept you from knowing this, and will continue to do so unless you wake up to their reality."
John Diamond, M.D. & Lee Cowden, M.D.
The CRUK components, the ICRF and the CRC, were instrumental in the sabotage, using false data, of the Bristol Cancer Help Centre: the Centre was becoming a threat to CRUK donations as increasing numbers of the public heard of its success rates.
read the rest of this report here
As no case of genuine, i.e. metastasizable, cancer has ever, or could ever , be successfully treated by CRUK-promoted treatments, it is imperative that CRUK now abandons its policy of not funding research into safe, effective, curative, non-patentable therapies. (CR-UK = Cancer Research United Kingdom )
With the theoretical 100% cancer incidence due within decades, CRUK must start to put the welfare of the patients and their relatives before the interests of the cancer business.
QUOTE>Dr. James Watson won a Nobel Prize for determining the shape of DNA. During the 1970's, he served two years on the National Cancer Advisory Board. In 1975, he was asked about the National Cancer Program. He declared, "It's a bunch of shit."
Nobel Prize Winner James Watson
Hey Charity Watch, I just bought you as my PET! <br/><a href='http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=361263053&source=in_comment._link...._PETL...._v4......'>Click here to find out how much I think you're WORTH!</a><br/><br/><a href='http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=361263053&source=in_comment._img1...._PETL...._v4......'><img src='http://cdn1.slicezero.com/oyf_prod/images/ffs_directory.png' border='0' /></a><br/>
<br /><br />
-------------------------------<br />
<i>This comment was sent by your friend via the <a href="http://www.myspace.com/361263053">Own Your Friends!</a> application. To block comments sent via Apps. click <a href="http://profileedit.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=accountSettings.applicationSettings">here</a>.</i> <br />
