The recall of American judges who pay no regard to the Constitution of the United States of America --- Who see us as the 'non accused', and lord over those that are 'mock tried for non crime', and take children away form families and don't see thier 'ADJUDICATION' as a sentence...
... SOS ...
I want to abolish CPS Agents and the pre-set dispositoin at the 'BENCH' and take the power of Consolidation issues regardin RULE 53 away from the judiciary, and put the automatic motion back into the hands of Counsel forcing them to declare their position over the interpretaions of law.
Music
I like Praise and Worship
Movies
Theif In The Night
Television
OPB
Books
The Holy Bible
"Aaron Russo's "Aaron Russo's Mad as Hell", 1943 -- 2007
RIP Aaron Russo February 14, 1943 -- August 24, 2007
Born in Brooklyn and raised on Long Island, producer Aaron Russo began promoting rock and roll shows at local theaters while still a high school student. He then worked for his family's undergarment business, where in 1963, he designed the first ladies bikini under wear. Five years later the twenty four year old entrepreneur opened his own nightclub in Chicago called the Kinetic Playground, which became a driving force in the music business, where Aaron helped create the careers of many legendary performers, such as Led Zeppelin. Aaron was responsible for bringing them to America for the first time. He also promoted some of the 60's most successful rock acts, including The Who, Janis Joplin, The Grateful Dead and Jefferson Airplane.
In 1972, Russo began his seven year partnership with Bette Midler, who became a superstar during his management of her career. In 1975 he produced the Tony award- winning "Clams on the Half-Shell Revue," which starred Bette Midler and Lionel Hampton. At the time it was the most successful ten-week broadway revue in history, grossing more than $1.8 million. While serving as Midler's manager, Russo created and managed the Manhattan Transfer. Later his roster would include such personalities as David Keith, Frederic Forest, Susan Sarandon and other notable clients.
When Russo turned to producing feature films, his production of "The Rose", introduced Bette Midler to motion picture audiences. Midler received an Academy Award nomination as best actress. "The Rose" is considered by many to be the classic rock n' roll film. Russo also produced "Trading Places," starring Eddie Murphy and Dan Aykroyd, which has become a Christmas classic, and "Teachers," starring Nick Nolte, Morgan Freeman, and Ralph Macchio.
Over the past years, Russo has received numerous awards for his achievements. They include a Grammy, a Tony, an Emmy for producing the best television special of the year "OL' Red Hair is Back," starring Dustin Hoffman and Bette Midler, plus many gold and platinum records. To date his films have been nominated for six Academy Awards, as well as seven Golden Globes. His films have won three Golden Globes, as well as the Image Award.
He wrote, produced, and directed a feature film/documentary titled "America...From Freedom To Fascism". The film is an expose of the Internal Revenue Service, and proves conclusively there is no law requiring an American citizen to pay a direct un apportioned Tax on their labor. The film is very provocative and is received standing ovations at its previews.
You can watch the film for free on Google video. Just search: freedom to fascism.
In 1996 Russo made a political video entitled "Aaron Russo's Mad as Hell", which was a hit throughout America. He was asked by the people of Nevada to run for governor and he made the decision to do so. The powers that be in Nevada scoffed at his decision to run for governor but were very surprised when he finished second with nearly thirty percent of the vote, beating the sitting lieutenant governor. In January of 2004, he declared his candidacy for the Libertarian Party's nomination for President of the Untied States. At the Convention in May, Russo won the first two ballots, but not a majority. He was defeated on the third and final ballot. He then channeled his energy into writing/directing America: From Freedom to Fascism.
Aaron will be fondly remembered and never forgotten as a courageous, kind and brilliant individual. His work for the fight for freedom will continue in the efforts of those he helped to inspire.
For more information on the fight against tyranny, visit: www.infowars.com
www.ronpaul.com
www.nineeleven.co.uk
Heroes
SEE: I HOPE u GO visit the LINKS...
THIS IS REGARDING YOUR LEGAL INHERITANCE
This is about more than just my son...
This is a video about CPS Abuse of power against our right to Equal Protection of the Laws...This could happen to anybody...None of these people committed a crime and have received worse punishment than a felon...
http://www.freeourkids.com/youtube/1.htm
JOIN MY BLOG GROUP http://groups.myspace.com/oathofoffice
Www.PetitionOnline.com/families/petition.html
http://www.freeourkids.com/index.htm
www.fightcps.com
Yeah...It is all-true!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yeah, we gave our common sense to the bureaucrat by assign down at the DMV...
You did.
I did.
We the People all did.
Please as me about UCC 1-308...
THESE LINKS ARE EVIDENCE AND CONSEQUENCE OF LEGAL ILLETERACY
http://www.flickr.com/photos/theandysimrin/
There is a reason why the system does a bad job:
http://www.jbs.org/node/4632 Read... and well, READ it and WEEP!!!! From now on put UCC 1-308 <<<<< MY NAME IS : Marilyn LeBaron. I am a Bellugerent Claumant, in Propria Persona, protecting the right of her family and I need your help.
I did not lose my son in a battle with the CPS they just sit there intimidating us, even after two years, and I don't get to see my son!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THEY NEVER HAD TO COME TO COURT EVEN IF THE JUDGE ORDERED THEM TO!!!!!!!! THEY LOSE BY DEFAULT ACCORDING TO THE RULES OF COURT! AND THEY STILL GOT TO BRING ANOTHER CASE IN PETITOIN AND THAT WAS BLOCKED. THEN PATIAL CROSS CONSOLIDATOIN BECAME VERY CLEAR TO ME... BUT, TOO LATE TO MAKE THE TIMELY OBJECTIONS.... SOS...
All this is a RULE 53 REFORM issue...Mandatory Arbitration Issue...Where we don't get a jury!!!!!!!!!!!!
Or the right to ‘Face the Assessor’ or all their hearsay!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
But, not regarding the topic that has been brought to John Edwards’s attention.... It is similar though. I would ask that you help me get your favorite Presidential Candidate to look at the topic of: Mandatory Arbitration...
My topic congruent to RULE 53 REFORM is pursuant to CPS REORM because of Judges Horner, Luuk'in'en, and Avera,
Along with pre-conviction in the wrong venue with a prosecutor that has no authority over what got him a second set of DOUBLE CONTINUANCES... a criminal allegation... One that had not 'been filed yet'!
I never got an arraignment... or a plea...
But, even worse... the non Criminal Prosecutor, Max R. Wall, did not have to Fully Advise 'his second hand client' that the 'violation of her right to a SPEEDY TRIAL was giving him a gross advantage, bolstered by his prophetic 'abilities', while in pursuit of 'Psychology the Wild Card'. Though 'his' client is adversely affected he has not obligation to give her Equal Protection of the Professional Rules of Conduct (PRC), with what is politically client sharing, and he calls that 'a Representation' of 'a Children's' voice! SOS
Relevant topics and otherwise a Political Complaint & SOS to the World
Cut and paste the above address into the address line then press go.
I am sending that petition everywhere. Churches, newspapers, judges, government offices, (DHS) I did yesterday. I have attached the letter I sent out with it so you can see what I wrote. If you were to write a letter of introduction requesting others to endorse this petition I would be glad to promote your letter of endorsement all over the State of Oregon by e-mail. I have about six hours into sending it out to everywhere all over the country. Of course I would keep my personal comments out of your cover letter or anything affiliated with your image and use a different e-mail.
If you wanted my help let me know.
Thanks,
Marilyn LeBaron
My endorsement is number 665 & '666', by accident.
Oops, here is another copy of what I have, So far, been sending everywhere.
Marilyn LeBaron, jesushealedmetoo@hotmail.com, sends you the enclosed page from PetitionOnline.com:
Personal comments from jesushealedmetoo@hotmail.com:
Dear Pastor's of America,
I am trying to draw your attention to an opportunity to help me get a tiny bit of satisfaction surrounding the DHS issues. There are many details I would like to share and since court is over it is OK to talk now since neither of us could be impeached for collaborating our testimony. Not that you would collaborate.
There is a very special favor I ask. Like I did the
Frayley's, the Gray's and other’s who go to Calvary
Chapel. This is what I have written so far:
This is my own personal endeavor. I am committed to telling as many people, as many as who will take the time to listen, about this family petition. I stop and ask people who look receptive everywhere I go to visit the web site where it the petition posted at the ‘http’ address above. So, please take the time to read so you may consider the full weight of the injustice I have suffered, if you know, please see if there was any indication, as per your account, as anything that I did to deserve this long hardship regarding the loss of both my children.
Please ask, "What is a good reason to completely sever the parent child bond and if you can point to me, and say, "Yes" she did qualify?" Next, I will ask you become familiar with what has brought the heartache of separation and isolation from my beloved children. If you cannot think of any direct accusation yourself, as I am still without a visit from either of my kids, since 04-25-2005 and from before, for my son, the time has been extended from Mother's Day past which resulted from an extended 'stay with is dad'. That extended ‘stay’ was forced upon my son at the end of his eleventh birthday celebration. He attended a belated birthday party on top of the main one he selected to celebrated with the people he was most familiar with here in his hometowns.
Bleu had a choice of where to celebrate his birthday; the main party was not to be celebrated at his fathers, as he decided to stay close to his best friends as his first option. His dad had his mother pick Bleu up on the weekend of February 04, 2005 and she did not return him to me as Bleu thought was the agreement and instead of keeping her promise she took him to his dad’s where they sang him the birthday song and then gave him a big birthday surprise, gift he is still unwrapping.
It would be a great comfort to me to see conversation abut the people who suffer because of the overpowering opinions of prejudice.
I would not ask you to sludge around in sad issues without offering a light to go with such dark topic. I know it is not healthy to dwell on these troubles and share my burden. I do not draw direct attention to them as a rule. But, since there is a solution to consider and I am asking you to delve into where the conditions are bleak and need your immediate attention. The conditions I am pointing to, are the kind we are told we have the weapons to fight against, as we are instructed in the Bible. We have a high place to chasten of its spiritual wickedness.
I do believe prayerful consideration is in order here and can say I will be one of many voices that have echoed the cry to have tougher regulations for the caseworker, though she is a necessary entity we need to put a clear message to the DHS to apply their efforts were the real needs are and not to be all 'Hinny Penny' bout any little nut that falls. Said conditions call for making sure the violations of power are kept in check and subject to a Pattern and Practice violation standard found in Section 14141 of the Civil Rights code pasted on the FBI's website and DHS agents should be held liable, like our other agencies are, and removed from office if not supervised properly.
If we all pull together and just say, "No more". A firm hand could mean DHS would have to have evidence instead of placing contractual negotiation practices as demands upon assumption where no crime has occurred, which is what is known as REASONANBLE EFFORTS, and that phrase is used to sever a parent child relationship on a technicality, like we gave him notice so we are proceeding to the termination stage. "I heard that in a case where no evidence of wrong was entered into court record. Our children are being treated like a commodity. I am sick. The blanketed truth is the DHS is now, for ten (or so) years after being endued with 'judicial powers', are acting like they are in a supervisory capacity instead of being a prosecutor’s venue. I would, very much, feel loved if you would take the time and read this petition I found and diligently as you to consider the future of our nation.
I was doing legal research when I found it. I would like to take each point and explain what happened in my case in response to our comment back before the trial that you did not know all the details, when I was not free to open up, prior to all the documentation.
If you would, extend your interest and permission for me to write to you. I am becoming a journalist of sorts and have collected some terms and phrases we should all be prepared to comment upon, now that this issue is coming to a head. I was in deepest prayer, and this seemed to be what I had hoped for. Please help me get the word out to people you know. If you would, like to endorse this petition, and provide me with a platform to correspond. I would like to share my personal testimony, which will never be heard in a court in Polk County as they have turned a deaf ear. I have the inclination that there will be no formal trial or event to bring a couple people to accountability, they don't care so far, what those women do with their authoritativeness, which is commonplace in our country today. The complaint is broadcasted as to say that even to the point where blatant perjury is overlooked, and pleasantries is replayed to such evil deeds and wily nilly is the considerations at the bench over your motherhood. And I don't see wily nilly as a word of wisdom.
I am prepared to tell write my account of each act against our Civil Rights and offer you the physical proof, as I do not expect any one to spread slander about our political body. That is not advisable even in the face of adversity, because confrontation is sometimes better avoided. But, I have carefully documented all the legalities and have case history and many confirmations of each accusation I intend to publicize.
Would you please help share my burden? I know that God is a God of justice, and he 'does not' like the double minded. So, why should be have one standard on one area of law and another standard in Family Law. Please help me get the message out that Equal Protection of the Law means Due Process for everyone.
That issue is covered in depth on line in this forgoing Redress of Grievance. Not a moment too soon. I have it pasted in my final prayer upon the court to Judge Horner, who I have asked to VACATE his signature or recuse and give me a change of venue. Please see what I pasted into the last pages of my final plea to an undeserving judge. I do not have the skill of this author and am just reaching a point where I am sure of my interpretations. I have proof in another case that an ounce of respect was extended to my legal brief.
But, I do not ask you to lean on me for the all the facts. Please, I earnestly beg you to research the following petition... I could not help but cry when I found it. I have found a consolation here.
Please take a look and then go see my comments where I endorsed this petition. I am number 665 and by accident '666', so that number is already taken, Oooooooo, I am getting a queasy feeling in my tummy, (Icky). You could be number 667 if you like I already got the 'best' space available. I intended to sit on his head and give him a black eye, so why not just hunt him in his den. I have looked and there have been no other new endorsements since mine. I checked about six'ish. So have a race with the Fraley couple. I have sent them a note as well. It would mean a lot to me.
I will be looking to see you say the lady in space 666 is someone I know, just like Bob Fraley in space ( ) --- ?When he endorses and puts a not in his comment box, if he does.?. She received prayer and was healed of the complaint she voiced to the elders of her church the week prior to Thanksgiving of 2004.
That lady has to face the unbeliever and doing all she can do to stand, just look at her go she has gone to kick the devil out of his place, (meaning space 666). I need your support and your prayers. All though God has taken the brunt of my sorrows I still yearn for my children every moment of the day.
I have not seen my son since Mothers Day of last year. My sixteen-year-old daughter was taken on November 22nd, 2005, for a follow up on something regarding my son, which DHS never took me to court on or showed up when invited so I could redirect or rebut their allegation. They plan to keep my daughter till she turns 21 and I am not allowed to see her or visit. Please help. Please understand what your influence will mean here.
Please pass it on for the sake of my children and the sake of your kids when they grow up.
Send a link to this site to all your family and friends and I am serious about sending you the provable points of my case, which is in logs and court papers. My story could help convince people to care about the safety of children and the rights of a parent in balance to what is fair to each personal situation. If you would extend an opportunity to correspond I am preparing to share my case with others. We need to warn people of the dangers of belief in something that does not exist. We need to be there to help each other and keep an eye out for one another.
Love in Christ,
UCC 1-308
Marilyn LeBaron
Here is a list of places I have contacted by e-mail so far.
From: jesushealedmetoo@hotmail.com
To: christpresbyterianchurch@gmail.com
Subject: FW: Please send to other people you know.
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 16:40:24 -0500
Christ Presbyterian Church
Mailing Address: 404 W. Pulaski Hwy.
Please note that worship service location and time are on Directions Page Elkton, MD 21921
christpresbyterianchurch@gmail.com
410-398-3192 From: jesushealedmetoo@hotmail.com
To: personnel@fapc.org
Subject: FW: Please send to other people you know.
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 16:42:02 –0500 Fifth Avenue
Presbyterian Church 7 West 55th Street, New York, NY 10019 Telephone: 212.247.0490 Dial-A-Prayer
212.246.4200, Thought Line 212.246.4204
455 Scotland St. Dunedin, Florida 34698
Victoria By Roade – Pastor Telephone: 727-733-2318 Saint Mark Presbyterian Church
10701 Old Georgetown Road Rockville, Maryland 20852
301-530-0600 FAX 301-530-2613
office@saintmarkpresby.org Pastor: The Rev. Dr. Roy W. Howard Pastor's
Email Director of
Christian Education and Family Ministries Scott Roby, Educator's Email CHURCHES OF THE HOLY LAND PO BOX 810461 BOCA RATON, FL 33481
Email: Info@churchesoftheholyland.com
cssmbc@cssm.ca cssmbc@cssm.ca To: at@cssm.ca
info@churchesoftheholyland.com at@cssm.ca at@cssm.ca qc@cssm.ca qc@cssm.ca
on@cssm.ca on@cssm.ca mb@cssm.ca mb@cssm.ca wordgenius@aol.com
Our website has moved! We're now located at http://www.DirectLineSoftware.com.
I was listening to Greg Pound a good friend of mine who is fighting for his four kids too on the Radio. What Greg filed a motion it took the thunder away from the judge. Greg wants you to call him his phone number is 727-319-3705. His web page is www.freeourkids.com The judges, Sheriff. Your Lawyer, The county commissioners, the clerk of courts and the local prosecutor all signed a contracts behind the scenes for money with out public knowledge to launder kids for federal money. If I were you I would write your state department of revenue and get all these contracts they signed because it is public record. Your case is scripted by these contracts to get as much federal money as they can. These contracts pose a conflict of interest with the judge, sheriff, the DA and your lawyer. These contract and corporative agreement are also breach the separation of powers between the executive, legislative and judicial branches outlined in your State Constitution. Now you know why they act the way they do in that courtroom. Ask Greg how to get a hold of Ralph Winteroowed. He is not a lawyer but he is brilliant on showing how to use they own play book against them and win.
GODSPEED
George Warm
From: omitted
who is this y did u send me something about ur son
I did not lose my son in a battle with the CPS they just sit there intimidating us, even after two years, and I don't get to see my son!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THEY NEVER HAD TO COME TO COURT EVEN IF THE JUDGE ORDERED THEM TO!!!!!!!! THEY LOSE BY DEFAULT ACCORDING TO THE RULES OF COURT! AND THEY STILL GOT TO BRING ANOTHER CASE IN PETITOIN AND THAT WAS BLOCKED......... THEN PATIAL CROSS CONSOLIDATOIN BECAME VERY CLEAR TO ME... BUT, TOO LATE TO MAKE THE TIMELY OBJECTIONS.... SOS...
All this is a RULE 53 REFORM issue... Mandatory Arbitration... Where we don't get a jury!!!!!!!!!!!! Or the right to ‘Face the Assessor’ or all their hearsay!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
But, not regarding the topic that has been brought to John Edwards’s attention.... It is similar though. I would ask that you help me get your favorite Presidential Candidate to look at the topic of: Mandatory Arbitration... My topic congruent to RULE 53 REFORM is pursuant to CPS REORM because of Judges Horner, Luuk'in'en, and Avera, …Along with pre-conviction in the wrong venue with a prosecutor that has no authority over what got him a second set of DOUBLE CONTINUANCES... a criminal allegation... One that had not 'been filed yet'!
I never got an arraignment... or a plea...
But, even worse... the non Criminal Prosecutor, Max R. Wall, did not have to Fully Advise 'his second hand client' that the 'violation of her right to a SPEEDY TRIAL was giving him a gross advantage, bolstered by his prophetic 'abilities', while in pursuit of 'Psychology the Wild Card'. Though 'his' client is adversely affected he has not obligation to give her Equal Protection of the Professional Rules of Conduct (PRC), with what is politically client sharing, and he calls that 'a Representation' of 'a Children's' voice! SOS
Relevant topics and otherwise a Political Complaint & SOS to the World
' a Jurisdiction' 'miss cal' at non-Punishment in non sentencing?!
Dear Somebody, Everybody, and Anyone who knows a
good paralegal.! Partial Cross Consolidation?"
Well, yes and no. Whichever way the judge sees it, in an automatic motion upon the court. Which must make a judge a party to a privilege over material presented and labeled, "Exhibit', being the briefs in court record are vacant of arguments for or against any point at law. Just MOTIONS from the DA and solemn objections from the Public Defender thereto, but denied by a judge who had no jurisdiction, -e.hem-. Yet, he claimed it after the trial date.
"If any tribunal finds absence of proof of jurisdiction over person and subject matter, the case must be dismissed." Louisville RR v. Motley, 211 US 149, 29 S. Ct. 42.
I was summoned, post trial date, under duress to PERSONALLY APPEAR, with no proper objection from the Sheriff, regardless of all my complaints against the DHS, who committed perjury and violated all my constitutional rights. I not knowing how to object, believing I was bound by the same scrutiny of proper form, hailed as homage, homage, homage, to High IQ, though an affront to law and order, in the face of the lack of arguments in the 'paperwork'. Let me rephrase that, "Paperwork?". Most, too legally illiterate to consider they may have an obligation to object, before they wind up in the same sticky spider web of 'in' Legalities my 'Life' was abused with.
['Life', Black's Law definition.] Please don't look to the abortionist for context.
The in legal MOTIONS filed upon the wrong venue were vacant of laws to look up for relevancy calls to issues never thoroughly discussed with anyone. Said MOTION Partial Cross Consolidation?"
Well, yes and no. Whichever way the judge sees it, in an automatic motion upon the court. Which must make a judge a party to a privilege over material presented and labeled, "Exhibit', being the briefs in court record are vacant of arguments for or against any point at law. Just MOTIONS from the DA and solemn objections from the Public Defender thereto, but denied by a judge who had no jurisdiction, -e.hem-. Yet, he claimed it after the trial date.
The miss placed MOTIONS filed upon the wrong venue were vacant of laws to look up for relevancy calls purported as adjacent to nonevents in the noncriminal prosecutors invivid nonsight, and big imagination. That which was no secured as 'Exhibits' was refuted, yet ignored by the judge, in favor of something that had not taken place yet. So actual law was tossed out and future prediction and 'Psychology the Wild Card' played 'in', which would not be the first time I did not get to face my accuser. But, that time I didn't even have a claim against me filed yet which was 'in'-non-pre brought against me on the wings of issues never thoroughly discussed with anyone or me. Said MOTIONS, although nonpertinent, yet honored because of a high position called non criminal prosecutor were regarding a future criminal act, that probable never happened anywhere, but, I, subjected to pre-conviction in noncriminal venue where there is no defense needed. Now adding to these points of argument, I ask you to look at the irrefutable, the Point, ' in'nonFact, ''' I am not either a respondent or a defendant in the Juvenile Matter''', but summoned anyway.
I truly believe there was any proper form available for any court to allow an arraignment in, regarding the future allegation, which gained a SECOND SET OF DOUBLE CONTINUANCES. Well, I don't see how either the judge or the noncriminal prosecutor can pre-convict me, not having jurisdiction over the non occurred, while they ask somebody, an unlicensed somebody to 'ask' my daughter to nod to a violation of both our rights to a SPEEDY TRIAL, when she did not want to be in foster care in the first place, at least not until I actually assault somebody.
So, why doesn't, "I don't understand", get me out of court entanglements when it worked fine for the DA down at the Oregon State Bar, when I complained the Noncriminal Prosecutor, served me this plate of spaghetti instead of law and order?
You may come across a word that you believe has the proper meaning; like capacity to contract. Words like visitation and prescription are much different in law than they appear, so look them up in your study.
1-103. Construction of [Uniform Commercial Code] to Promote its Purposes and Policies: Applicability of Supplemental Principles of Law.
(a) [The Uniform Commercial Code] must be liberally construed and applied to promote its underlying purposes and policies, which are: (1) to simplify, clarify, and modernize the law governing commercial transactions; (2) to permit the continued expansion of commercial practices through custom, usage, and agreement of the parties; and (3) to make uniform the law among the various jurisdictions.
(b) Unless displaced by the particular provisions of [the Uniform Commercial Code], the principles of law and equity, including the law merchant and the law relative to capacity to contract, principal and agent, estoppel, fraud, misrepresentation, duress, coercion, mistake, bankruptcy, and other validating or invalidating cause supplement its provisions.
Wikipedia: The capacity of both natural and artificial persons determines whether they may make binding amendments to their rights, duties and obligations, such as getting married or merging, entering into contracts, making gifts, or writing a valid will. Capacity is an aspect of status and both are defined by a person's personal law:
for natural persons, the law of domicile or lex domicilii in common law states, and either the law of nationality or lex patriae, or of habitual residence in civil law states;
for artificial persons, the law of the place of incorporation, the lex incorporationis for companies while other forms of business entity derive their capacity either from the law of the place in which they were formed or the laws of the states in which they establish a presence for trading purposes depending on the nature of the entity and the transactions entered into.
When the law limits or bars a person from engaging in specified activities, any agreements or contracts to do so are either voidable or void for incapacity. Sometimes such legal incapacity is referred to as incompetence. For comparison, see Competence (law).
Code must be regarded as supreme. -- Where both the code and general principles are available, the former should always be considered and applied if applicable. By legislative declaration, the code is the law, and if general principles appear inconsistent, they must be considered displaced under this section. Moreover, even where inconsistencies does not exist, the code must be regarded as supreme; general principles, even when consistent with the code, are merely supplementary. Prince v. LeVan, 486 P.2d 959 (Alaska 1971)"
Authority indicates that "the principles of contract law continue under the Code." 1 R. Anderson, Uniform Commercial Code ß 1-103:18, at 25 & cases cited n. 3 (2d ed. 1970). See Braund, Inc. v. White, 486 P.2d 50 (Alaska, 1971).
Giving the 'double speak', 'Partial Cross Consolidation?', a double 'in' on-on tundra we can all see, hear and identify when we say it: You give it a try, "Partial Cross Consolidation: RULE 53 REFORM: 'a Must' at 'non criminal' law, especially when 'in'non-kris crossed with criminal prosecution, which makes it ''A MUST' at Crime & pre-non-conviction and a jurisdiction call at the non-Punishment non sentencing. Well, if you get what I meant by in-'non'heard in the wrong venue:
"If any tribunal finds absence of proof of jurisdiction over person and subject matter, the case must be dismissed." Louisville RR v. Motley, 211 US 149, 29 S. Ct. 42.
How is there jurisdiction were proper form in not plausibly needed? Yet when in reference to nonprosecution, jurisdiction is exercised and is regarding a future criminal act against he who has no voice, but, I, subjected to pre-conviction in noncriminal venue where there is no defense needed yet. Now adding to the Point in Fact, I am not either a respondent or a defendant in the Juvenile Matter, I truly believe there was no proper form available for any court to allow an arraignment in. Well, at least not until I actually assault somebody.
Rule 12(h)(3) - "Whenever is appears by suggestion of the parties or otherwise that the court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter, the court shall dismiss the action."
"Jurisdiction of the subject matter is derived from the law. It can neither be waived nor conferred by consent of the accused. Objection that the court does not have jurisdiction of the subject matter may be made at any stage of the proceedings, and the right to make such objection is never waived. Citing: 21 Am.Jur.2d Criminal Law §379 (1965)" Morgan v. Alaska, id., n.11, 635 P.2d 472 (1981)
The courtroom is rife with commercial activity but stay calm, even when the court tells you that the UCC does not apply. He may be partially correct in that the UCC may not apply. But the phrase "exhibit the instrument" does and you could not locate a competent lawyer to demand the instrument. You may prefer to write the UCC 3-501 in Affidavit style, which is in the "Document Section" when writing to the court. Stick to the fact that agency must perfect their claim to your person and the subject matter and "exhibit the instrument." The court does not care if you are a Citizen of the state or resident of Amendment XIV. At the administrative stage of the proceedings and the UCC phrase may be used by any "suitor" to establish a due process claim.
The only way I have found that gets the courts attention is to stand as a Belligerent Claimant and demand whatever Rights you have whether you are a state Citizen or U.S. citizen. We are all equal as debtors and the only differences are in your contract. The Bill of Rights and Amendment XIV are alive and well when you demand due process under the UCC. If your contract is in default or dishonored, you must revoke signatures and rely on the unconscionable clause at UCC 2-302. "It is a well established principle of law that all federal legislation applies only within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States unless a contrary intent appears." - Foley Brothers v. Filardo, 336, U.S. 281. See also: Caha v. U.S., 152 U.S. 211; Heath v. Ala, 474 U.S. 187; U.S. v. Spelar, 338 U.S. 217 at 222; New Oleans v. United States 35 U.S.,(10 pet.) 662(1836); Pollard v. Hagan, 44 U.S. 213, 221, 223; among others.
Giving the 'double speak', 'Partial Cross Consolidation?', a double 'in' on-on tundra' we can all see, hear and identify when we say it: You give it a try, "Partial Cross Consolidation: REPEAL IT: RULE 53 REFORM": 'a Must' at 'non criminal' law, especially when 'in'non-crisscrossed with criminal prosecution, which makes it ''A MUST' at Crime & pre-non-conviction and a jurisdictional 'miss cal' at non-Punishment in non sentencing. Well, if you get what I meant by in-'non'heard in the wrong venue:
The UCC provides that "principles of law and equity ... shall supplement its provisions" unless "displaced by [its] particular provisions." Mo. Rev. Stat. § 400.1-103.
Authority indicates that "the principles of contract law continue under the Code." 1 R. Anderson, Uniform Commercial Code ß 1-103:18, at 25 & cases cited n. 3 (2d ed. 1970). See Braund, Inc. v. White, 486 P.2d 50 (Alaska, 1971).
The defendant/debtor should receive an information, complaint, or indictment. The Citizen should proceed with caution and treat the presentment as though it were a, proposal, bill of exchange, or third party commercial paper. Failure to refute the paper will give your adversary an "expectation" and belief that you are considering the proposal and their process will continue. Your administrative record will not contain any facts to refute the agency presumption of debt and the judge will give agency summary judgment.
If you actually owe the debt or tax, pay it. Credit cards and mortgage instruments concern goods and/or services and this author has not found a cure for this type of debt. The cure is not within the UCC and neither are defaults. I would suggest that the reader steer clear of Acceptance For Value, UCC-1, Redemption and tax filing theories.
To rebut the validity of the presentment and reserve your Rights send your State UCC 3-501 via certified mail with return receipt. You rebut the findings of the administrative agency by demanding the instrument you signed, the names and identity of the agent or principal and the authority for the presentment or demand. A demand may be from building code agent, school officials, support or protective services, or the IRS for not filing a tax return and you must respond or you will be presumed guilty by silence and you waive rights to review of the law issues. All "triable issues of fact" must be exhausted prior to pleading and summary adjudication must be denied regarding that matter if agency attempts to push the issue into court. Your administrative record must show that you have denied the debt and are attempting to work out the issue. I have not had a presumed debt go to court when I use the UCC.
The agency may, at their discretion, ignore your demand to "exhibit the instrument" that caused the liability at their peril. They may also turn the instrument over to a collection agency and you must repeat the same process with them. The administrative record will reflect the fact that you are also "without dishonor" and not "willfully" or "intentionally" [FRCP 12 (b (6)] failing to pay or fill out paperwork per the code until agency produces a valid claim. The agency must comply with the demand or be in want of subject matter [contract], jurisdiction [FRCP 12 (b) (1)] because validation of the adversary claim must be in writing and produce proof of your obligation by showing your signature which gives the court personal jurisdiction [FRCP 12 (b) (2)] to summon you to court for the sake of the creditor. UCC 3-501 puts the tribunal on notice that your rights are reserved and you demand a presentment instrument be validated and goes to the heart of subject matter because "exhibit the instrument" also means you demand a proper charges.
As your New Years Resolution... HAPPY NEW YEAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!
on MySpaceIM you can get it here www.myspace.com/myspaceim my username is innonatnion
As your New Years Resolution...
Impeach Corrupt Judges Now - ( - K.I.S.S. HOW TO - )
Law is like any language, "If you expose yourself to it long enough you will learn to speak". But to speak well enough to win and arguement one must actually study the written word and learn to write it in sentences.
As soon as you get to my 'Friend Tree I will know. I'll see you as a new friend in my referral line and send you the link to Legal Literacy Club, a place for posting case law and defense methods, where I put new info I recieve from all my sources of diligent independent thinking citizens.
Challenge to Nancy Pelosi, Robert Wexler and Alcee Hastings
(EXTENDED COMPLAINT AGAINST FLORIDA PUBLIC OFFICES)
(- http://www.youtube.com/v/P6EWf1k6jDI&rel=1 -)
Mark Foley, has drawn the attention of the Democrats and anyone who has the least knowledge of the Foley problems, no matter how inconsequential, if a Republican should, per many, resign from office. Some should. But this is small potatoes as it involves the failings of one man.
If these Democrats want to crusade on officials' federal crime, start with Florida and Palm Beach County which both Robert Wexler and Alcee Hastings represent and on the corrupt Florida Bar of which strangely each is a member (strangely as Robert Wexler has an impeccable record and Alcee Hastings is an impeached and convicted federal judge who was removed from office for taking bribes and corruption).
A considerable number of the Florida state representatives and state senators that I did not talk to for they cared not to learn of corrupt Florida judges, and did so en masse with no exceptions by party rule it seems, are now in the U.S. Congress, male and female.
It is now more than ten years since the first judicial failures in ruling against corrupt judges began.
It is well past time for an answer to be given.
See the other posts and write if you want to defend the canard that "Judges have absolute immunity" so get over it. That is false as we all know but act as if judges are untouchable.
Anyone may comment or write me at my Google mail,
fight.the.corrupt@gmail.com
but no one should just do nothing, for that is how we got to where we are as a nation---indifference.
To block this app and all communications from it, click Here.
-------------------------------------------
AuntyBLAWGwar just sent you a Slideshow! Click here to view the show
RULE 53 REFORM video for judicial accountability titled 'The Andy Simrin and Friends UCRCoA', Wednesday, June 18, 2008 Link to LeBaron Family Political Complaint
A Posted Reply to Sherri Yoakum, Ombudsman,
Governor's Advocacy and Children's Ombudsman Office Department of Human Services 1-800-442-5238 DHS.INFO@state.or.us
[For Publication]
Delivered to Secure Mailbox: securemailer.d-78099-9vh8qvrv@secureemail.hr.state.or.us
