General Due Notice of CPS Legislation ............ http://cid-20b2e37fd5a5c5a3.spaces.live.com/ ............ Please tell every body you know.Due Notice: ............ You have no rights unless you know how to defend them. ............ Court Appointed Attorneys Do Not ............ You must always reserve your rights whenever you sign you name especially on government issue documents; SOCIAL SECURITY, Public School Registration Forms, Voter's Registration, Birth Certificate, Bank Accounts, Driver's License, Marriage License, etc... ............ If you don't reserve your right you hand over your Power of Attorney over your children to SOCIAL SERVICES. ............ You then can receive the equivalent of the Death Penalty without the equivalent of a grand jury indictment. ........... Your children have no say and neither do you. ........... Please Reserve your rights 'Without Prejudice' now... ............ Please help me get this message to everybody you know. ........... Thank you. ........... TO RECIEVE A COPY OF THE ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FILED AT THE MOMNOUTH POLICE DEPARTMENT (WITH ALL THE LINKS IN IT) PLEASE WRITE: ............ madatcps@aol.com ............ All Rights Reserved *********** Without Prejudice *********** UCC 1-308 ............ Marilyn LeBaronTermination of Parental Rights -The most basic issues are:
We cannot have Constitutional government if we do not have Constitutional Courts. Roger Weidner
Bureaucrat Protection is not Child Protection Marilyn LeBaron
Announcing Content or Prejudice March
http://cid-0009ccb030dda459. events. live. com/default. aspx
Termination of Parental Rights is Equivalentto the Death Penalty. When one person can walk through your front door, take your children, keep them, bill you too, pass the laws that empower them, and then not give you a grand jury indictment, when a tip from a anonymous person was never faced in open court, while attorneys do not demand trial by jury, and then pass all the statutes, regulations, and policies, which are repugnant and deliberately designed to circumvent, ignore the supreme law, the ones judges swear to uphold and defend, we are caused to loose all our inalienable rights, which defined our citizenship. If we have no citizen ship we have no alliance with our national origin and are in fact alienated to that which is our natural inherent birthright. These violations of our American Due Process Rights are compounded by judges, psychologists, and attorneys violating the Separation of Powers defined in the Federalist Papers Article 86 by being a member of one branch of government that controls the other while gaining the position of god from the opinion of one man.
http://journals. aol. com/blawgwar/blawgwar/
All Rights Reserved
Without Prejudice
UCC 1-308
Marilyn LeBaron Free Comments & Graphics Music www.myspace.com/myspaceim my username is madatcpsChristian Glitter by www.christianglitter.com LORD.OF.THE.JURY
Date: Dec 29, 2007 1:50 AM
Funny Pictures at pYzam.com
on MySpaceIM you can get it here www.myspace.com/myspaceim my username is counsel_of_choice
Get Funny Pictures at pYzam.com
on MySpaceIM you can get it here www.myspace.com/myspaceim my username is we_recall_judge_horner
Funny Pictures at pYzam.com
Here is what we have all needed to prove we do not have an advocate in the BAR Association.
RE: Get the word out!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Impeach Corrupt Judges Now - Bring Federal Charges
IMPEACH A CORRUPT JUDGE TODAY
MySpace Video Link: 'HOW TO'
How to write an Impeachment against a Corrupt Judge
Public Official: ):
FOR very simple ):
(--- (K.I.S.S. INSTRUCTIONS ----):
(--- copy -n- past LINK ----):
(--- http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=152020542&blogID=339554385&Mytoken=7C131F7A-CF7F-4512-9E7D6FBAE6D32C7D26051134 ---)
Challenge to Nancy Pelosi, Robert Wexler and Alcee Hastings
(EXTENDED COMPLAINT AGAINST FLORIDA PUBLIC OFFICES)
http://www.youtube.com/v/P6EWf1k6jDI&rel=1
Mark Foley, has drawn the attention of the Democrats and anyone who has the least knowledge of the Foley problems, no matter how inconsequential, if a Republican should, per many, resign from office. Some should. But this is small potatoes as it involves the failings of one man.
If these Democrats want to crusade on officials' federal crime, start with Florida and Palm Beach County which both Robert Wexler and Alcee Hastings represent and on the corrupt Florida Bar of which strangely each is a member (strangely as Robert Wexler has an impeccable record and Alcee Hastings is an impeached and convicted federal judge who was removed from office for taking bribes and corruption).
A considerable number of the Florida state representatives and state senators that I did not talk to for they cared not to learn of corrupt Florida judges, and did so en masse with no exceptions by party rule it seems, are now in the U.S. Congress, male and female.
It is now more than ten years since the first judicial failures in ruling against corrupt judges began.
It is well past time for an answer to be given.
See the other posts and write if you want to defend the canard that "Judges have absolute immunity" so get over it. That is false as we all know but act as if judges are untouchable.
Anyone may comment or write me at my Google mail,
fight.the.corrupt@gmail.com
but no one should just do nothing, for that is how we got to where we are as a nation---indifference.
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=IMPEACH+A+CORRUPT+JUDGE+&search=Search
(You Tube search info above)
(You Tube search title 'IMPEACH A CORRUPT JUDGE')
Yuwie
http://www.yuwie.com/yuwie.asp?r=268928&vid=1365498
Hit SIGN UP under the feet of Yuwie guy, enter your information, verify your account with the link sent to your e-mail account.
Please forgive the advertisements and junk mail.
(Hit 'SKIP' at the bottom of the page or No Thanks)
Hit the back button to get out of pop ups
Did you know there was a CPS Class Action going on?
[DID YOU HEAR ABOUT IT ON THE NEWS?]
28 MILLION PEOPLE COMPLAINING
Polk County Circuit Court has over 70,000 complaints against the Dallas DHS / CPS Office.
That means the non criminal prosecutor ( DA ) is not doing right by the people and SOCIAL WORKERS are getting away with 'murder' while judges and Attorneys look the other way.
This needs to STOP.
You need the CPS (free) HANDBOOK to help you understand what is going wrong. You need the CPS (free) HANDBOOK before the Child Protective Services knock on your door. They don't tell you your rights and neither do the POLICE. Get a Copy From (e-for-mation@hotmail.com)
ALSO AVAILABLE: Notice and Revocation of Power of Attorney.
ALSO AVAILABLE: NOTICE OF RESERVATION OF RIGHTS.
Because what you don't know can HURT YOU.
EXAMPLE:
Supreme Court said the you don't have to help DHS prove their case but judges punish you if you don't cooperate.
(That is a violation of Judicial Code of Conduct)
EXAMPLE:
America's Foster Care system is a quagmire that is spawning a generation of forgotten and forsaken children. Thousands are being neglected, abused, even murdered under what is ostensibly government protection. - Time magazine, November 13, 2000.
EXAMPLE:
Did you know Attorneys work for the Court who appoint them first, THEN THEIR NEXT DUTY IS TO THE STATE OF OREGON, before you? That if you give up your Personam, have a Court Appointed Attorney 'Represent' your person, you become a WARD OF THE COURT, meaning Person of Unsound Mind.
~@~@~@~@~
If your friends or neighbors have a complaint please let them know about my web site. If you have a complaint you would like to post please send it to me to post on my blogs and send to the media. Also, please get a Yuwie account, too you can get you story posted in as many places as possible. My referral link to sign up http://r.yuwie.com/antigov
You tell your story, I'll tell you mine, and so forth. I have over 7,000 e-mail addresses I send Political Complaints to and will help you get a copy of a Federal Injunction.
Legal Literacy is my Blog topic on MySpace & Yuwie & are for the purposes of CPS REFORM.
I have a several study groups to promote Legal Literacy so citizens do not become WARD of the Court when in legal battles. Our families are not respected as an institution.
~@~@~@~
Find out about Child Protection Abuses of Power:
Blogs from MySpace are posted there.
Regarding Two Things:
http://www.yuwie.com/blog/entry.asp?id=268928&eid=136959
This is cruel this is usual.
http://www.yuwie.com/blog/entry.asp?id=268928&eid=136496
TAKING BACK OUR COURTS
http://www.yuwie.com/blog/entry.asp?id=268928&eid=136485
The Sheriff, not the judge, who is the chief law enforcement officer.
http://www.yuwie.com/blog/entry.asp?id=268928&eid=136484
Death Penalty is equal to Termination of Parental Rights.
http://www.yuwie.com/blog/entry.asp?id=268928&eid=136480
Immediate assistance needed to end this intolerable judicial corruption.
http://www.yuwie.com/blog/entry.asp?id=268928&eid=136471
It Is Time For A Change!
http://www.yuwie.com/blog/entry.asp?id=268928&eid=136469
Torture in an ice chamber at the Orange County Sheriffs Office.
http://www.yuwie.com/blog/entry.asp?id=268928&eid=136464
Is a judge god?
http://www.yuwie.com/blog/entry.asp?id=268928&eid=135484
BEFORE you sign!!!
http://www.yuwie.com/blog/entry.asp?id=268928&eid=132942
God hates the double minded. Please stand with God.
http://www.yuwie.com/blog/entry.asp?id=268928&eid=137864
~@~@~@~
I found the Emancipation Proclamation Petition over a year ago which is directed a reforming the Court Process.
http://www.PetitionOnline.com/families/petition.html
A link is posted on my Blogs please go see why you should endorse that petition. But, if you do endorse the Emancipation Proclamation Petition please include in your comment line 'Without Prejudice' UCC 1-308, which is very important.
We are not gaining momentum on that petition fast enough. But, there are sources in the media that are speaking the truth now regarding CPS abuses of Power.
Please help me get the articles posted on my Yuwie Blogs out to people. That truth will help promote the Emancipation Proclamation Petition.
I post stories about Child Protective Service abuses of Power & to help inform people about how to protect themselves. I will be posting Supreme Court rule decisions here that will help you understand how important Legal Literacy is.
I collect as many complaints as I can. Tons of these Political Complaints are posted on MySpace.
If you have not seen any of them please come here to get information.
To shed light on this topic please find people with CPS abuse / injustice problems and I will Post them here.
~@~@~@~
America's Foster Care system is a quagmire that is spawning a generation of forgotten and forsaken children. Thousands are being neglected, abused, even murdered under what is ostensibly government protection. - Time magazine, November 13, 2000.
Real 'Life' drama, more 'Psychology the 'Wild Card'.
Please forward to any news station in Orange County California and to the Governor of California. (You Know Whom). Please help Julie get this exposed. Those judges need to know 'We the People' are paying attention'.
This could happen to anybody. It happened to me but not as bad. The DA just invented a future crime and took my daughter. The DHS still tried to take my grand baby with it and all the criminal charges I faced was dropped after I fired my Court Appointed Attorney and went right in there (communicating in the written format only) and made my own objections to the DA and told the judge he had a pre set disposition. I did better than the 'lawyer'.
Tomorrow we write the Federal Injunction for Julie A Witherspoon.
This is going on in California. Wickedness sheer wickedness in political circles. Reads like fiction. Torture lies, mother raped at the time of Sheriff contact while being searched, kidnapping, generals taking advantage of women who will not put up with bully tactics, a girl molested by the father’s circle of friends, (father also a child molester and working for the public school system even if the Court issued a finding that kids were in danger around him, ) A boy thrown to the ground by his throat after being seized by his IV in the hospital while protecting his mother. Veteran mother and children seized out of Germany Hospital. Kids put on a plane to America, mother put in the mental hospital at the orders of an evil commander who showed up at the hospital with a blank order and accused Julie of being suicidal when she was ill (her and her children hospitalized for he same sickness). She demanded a hearing and never got one. Her kids flown out of Germany to cause her to come here to fight for custody and win. Then her husband just drops the kids off at the Welfare Office and now they are going to be put up for adoption. (??????) The judge ignored all that. Julie is not going to kill herself, never was. Her commander just said at the time he and a conspirator took her, "You was drunk the other day and we are taking the kids". Motions to recuse the California judge are ignored and the Attorney who wrote the MOTION suffers retaliation from the bar. This Judge is in the same Masonic Order Julie Witherspoon's ex husband is a member of. (Her ex is a 33rd degree Mason).
The media will not believe it or cover the story. Now Julie has a (bogus) warrant out for her arrest for not following a pre-emptive court order to turn in her fire arm on false allegation rebutted by her lawyer and not pressed or reported to the police but called an eminent thereat (future threat against a 'foster parent' (the home where he daughter got raped in). (Julie was out of town when the allegation arose she threatened the Foster Mother.) The woman told a Case Worker (days later) and then recanted and said, "I can't recall that happened". The Bar is attacking and Disbarring one of Julie's Attorneys for trying to protect her from 'Hate Crimes' against her and her two children. Bureaucrat protection is not child protection but they use the Juvenile Process ( non criminal venue ) to pre convict on criminal offenses when that is a violation and a pattern and a practice in 'simulating legal process' against the right to the presumption of innocence when a crime has not been committed.
(Julie Fears For Her Life) She thought she was going to be killed when they put her in an ICE CHAMBER AT THE ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE after being labeled a Belligerent Claimant, because she tried to fire he Child Protective Caseworker with a SUBSTITUTION OF POWER OF ATTORNEY placing her Pen as her Children’s Voice.
When she comes to the courthouse to file with the Clerk they arrest her for trespassing. (Evil, sheer evil, She has tape-recording so all of it. I mean all of it. You will be a first hand witness to this corruption and know you would never want to be in any entanglement with our current judiciary. They are sheer evil and "Just say, "Yes, Massa" is all they think is a citizen response when the CPS knock.
Psychology the 'Wild Card'.
(If your or somebody your know is in a similar situation:)
You must file a Refute and Send in a Notice of RESERVATION OF ALL YOUR RIGHTS Pursuant to UCC 1-308, Get a Certified Copy of the Judges Oath of Office, Send in a Revocation of Power of Attorney. File a Federal Court Action based on violations of your Due Process Rights. File Criminal Charges on the Judiciary. GO PUBLIC. Select the applicable FACTS: Remain Silent and don't talk to the Judge!
If your interested in any of the other documents please request them.
Do not alter the format of the CPS (free) HANDBOOK.
Do not use it in MOTION FORMAT.
(There are very specific reasons why)
CPS (free) HANDBOOK Club has answers. Please join. It is free, too. (click the link)
Yuwie (link)
http://www.yuwie.com/yuwie.asp?r=268928&vid=1365498
Hit SIGN UP under the feet of Yuwie guy, enter your information, vrify your account with the link sent to your e-mail account.
Please forgive the advertisements and junk mail.
(Hit 'SKIP' at the bottom of the page or No Thanks)
Please Post your CPS Complaint in my Yuwie Club. I will send your story to the Media.
Example: Here is something I write, mail out and post.
You guys NEED TO GO IN THERE AND UPHOLD YOUR OATH OF OFFICE AND ARREST THAT JUDGE!!!!!!!!!
Bad Judges Have To Go
From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 12:35 AM
To: kmagdaleno@ocsd.org
Subject: Fw: From OCSD Internet
From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 12:27 AM
To: kmagdaleno@ocsd.org
Cc: madatcps
Subject: From OCSD Internet
Ben Brandzel, John Edwards for President..; Military.comSelect..; MilitarydotcomOfferCentermdc@epraponcha.com;
julie.a.witherspoon@us.army.mil;
Before You Sign. by !aLiBeRoNa!
There Is A Reason The System Does A Bad Job by !aLiBeRoNa!
'LONG ARM OF THE DHS': AS 'FELLOWSHIP OF THE DUPLICIT' 'in' 'LORD OF THE JURY' by !aLiBeRoNa!
INDEX OF MY BLOGS SO FAR. by !aLiBeRoNa!
Something is terribly wrong!!!! by !aLiBeRoNa!
Are Court Appointed Attorneys Fully Advised? by !aLiBeRoNa!
DEATH WATCH by Pamela
DEVON SCOTT DICKER by Pamela
Child Protection Services by Pamela
WARNING- Sexually explicite content, Adult Content, Adult Language. by Pamela
Orange County Sherrif - In the News by Pamela
Pattern at nonPractice in noncriminal lawlessness? by !aLiBeRoNa!
GOLDEN RULES of YUWIE SUCCESS by * Poldepc *
Things You Get Paid To Do At Yuwie by !aLiBeRoNa!
In contempt of the Constitution of the United States of America. by !aLiBeRoNa!
Are You Sleeping? Are You Sleeping? America? by !aLiBeRoNa!
We Want To Be 'King Of Yuwie Hill'...!!! by !aLiBeRoNa!
Do you deserve the Death Penalty... Did they give you a Grand Jury Indictment? by !aLiBeRoNa!
Eyes on Cild Protective Services by !aLiBeRoNa!
MySpace Mail For Julie Witherspoon by !aLiBeRoNa!
Andrew Jackson by !aLiBeRoNa!
Operation Slam Door on 'Child Protective Services' by !aLiBeRoNa!
God hates the double minded. Please stand with God. by !aLiBeRoNa!
Regarding Two Things: by !aLiBeRoNa!
This is cruel this is usual. by !aLiBeRoNa!
TAKING BACK OUR COURTS by !aLiBeRoNa!
The Sheriff, not the judge, who is the chief law enforcement officer. by !aLiBeRoNa!
Death Penalty is equal to Termination of Parental Rights. by !aLiBeRoNa!
Immediate assistance needed to end this intolerable judicial corruption. by !aLiBeRoNa!
It Is Time For A Change! by !aLiBeRoNa!
Torture in an ice chamber at the Orange County Sheriffs Office by !aLiBeRoNa!
Is a judge god? by !aLiBeRoNa!
December 11 12:38 AM
(http://judgethebench.spaces.live.com/)
mel me bleu
Glad to see people are coming together to stop government from coming into our homes and taking children under false pretenses. I have won my case, but I'm concerned that they may attempt to re-file.
On my own I will file an appeal to try and remove the dismissal WITHOUT PREJUDICE and request that the appellate court change the terminology to WITH PREJUDICE. I encourage all to look into coming together and filing a nation wide RICO lawsuit against the injustices in the justice system. Do Google searches on RICO's to understand more of what they are about.
Keep up the fight...
Wayde (California)
The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (commonly referred to as RICO Act or RICO) is a United States federal law that provides for extended penalties for criminal acts performed as part of an ongoing criminal organization. RICO was enacted by section 901(a) of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, Pub. L. No. 91-452, 84 Stat. 922 (15 October 1970). RICO is codified as Chapter 96 of Title 18 of the United States Code, 18 U.S.C. § 1961 through 18 U.S.C. § 1968.
It has been speculated that the name and acronym were selected in a sly reference to the movie Little Caesar, that featured a notorious gangster named "Rico." The original drafter of the bill, G. Robert Blakey, refused to confirm or deny this.[1]
Summary Under RICO, a person or group who commits any two of 35 crimes—27 federal crimes and 8 state crimes—within a 10-year period and, in the opinion of the United States Attorney bringing the case, has committed those crimes with similar purpose or results can be charged with racketeering. Those found guilty of racketeering can be fined up to $25,000 and/or sentenced to 20 years in prison. In addition, the racketeer must forfeit all ill-gotten gains and interest in any business gained through a pattern of "racketeering activity." When the U.S. Attorney decides to indict someone under RICO, he has the option of seeking a pre-trial restraining order or injunction to prevent the transfer of potentially forfeitable property, as well as require the defendant to put up a performance bond. This provision was placed in the law because the owners of Mafia-related shell corporations often absconded with the assets. An injunction and/or performance bond ensures that there is something to seize in the event of a guilty verdict.
There is also a provision for private parties to sue. A "person damaged in his business or property" can sue one or more "racketeers." There must also be an "enterprise." The defendant(s) are not the enterprise, in other words, the defendant(s) and the enterprise are not one and the same. There must be one of four specified relationships between the defendant(s) and the enterprise. This lawsuit, like most Federal civil lawsuits, can take place in either Federal or State court.
November 27 6:34 PM
(http://cid-8051be8e2048710c.spaces.live.com/)
August 24
The Ashwander rules: Qualifying for the Supreme Court
The Ashwander rules: Qualifying for the Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has developed seven rules, called the "Ashwander Rules" (Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority 297 US 288,346 (1935)) for qualifying a case to be heard there. According to Justice Brandeis: "The Court developed, for its own governance in the cases confessedly within its jurisdiction, a series of rules under which it has avoided passing upon a large part of all the constitutional questions pressed upon it for decision. They are:
The Court will not pass upon the constitutionality of legislation in a friendly, non-adversary, proceeding, declining because to decide such questions 'is legitimate only in the last resort, and as a necessity in the determination of real, earnest and vital controversy between individuals. It was never thought that, by means of a friendly suit, a party beaten in the legislature could transfer to the courts an inquiry as to the constitutionality of the legislative act.' Chicago & Grand Trunk RR v. Wellman, 143 U.S. 339,345.
The Court will not 'anticipate a question of constitutional law in advance of the necessity of deciding it.' Wilshire Oil Co. v. US, 295 US 188 'It is not the habit of the Court to decide questions of a constitutional nature unless absolutely necessary to the decision of a case.' Burton v. US, 196 US 283,295.
The Court will not 'formulate a rule of constitutional law broader than is required by the precise facts to which it is to be applied.' Liverpool N.Y. & P.S.S. Co. v. Emigration Commissioners, 113 US 33,39.
The Court will not pass upon a constitutional question although properly presented by the record, if there is also present some other ground upon which the case may be disposed of. This rule has found most varied application. Thus, if a case can be decided on either of two grounds, one involving a constitutional question, the other a question of statutory construction or general law, the Court will decide only the latter. Light v. US, 220 US 523,538.
The Court will not pass upon the validity of a statute upon complaint of one who fails to show that he is injured by its operation. Tyler v. The Judges, 179 US 405 Among the many applications of this rule, none is more striking than the denial of the right of challenge to one who lacks a personal or property right.
The Court will not pass upon the constitutionality of a statute at the instance of one who has availed himself of its benefits. Great Falls Mfg. Co. v. Attorney General 124 US 581.
'When the validity of an act of Congress is drawn in question, and even if a serious doubt of constitutionality is raised, it is a cardinal principle that this Court will first ascertain whether a construction of the statute is fairly possible by which the question may be avoided.' Crowell v. Benson, 285 US 22,62."
(-U. S.- ,82 L. ed. (Adv. 787), 58 S. Ct.-.)
Courts. § 377 – duty of Federal Courts to follow State decisions on matters of general law.
The Phrase “laws of the several states” in the provision of § 34 of the Federal Judiciary
Act of September 24, 1789, chap. 20, 28 U.S.C.A. § 725, that the laws of the several states, except where the Constitution, treaties, or statutes of the United States otherwise require or provide, shall be regarded as rules of decision in trials at COMMON LAW, IN THE COURTS OF THE United States, in cases where they apply, cannot constitutionally be construed as excluding in matters of general jurisprudence the unwritten law of the state as declared by its highest court. Swift v. Tyson, 16 Pet. 1 10 L. ed. 865, OVERRULED.
Common Law, § 2- of nation.
There is no Federal common law, and Congress has no power to declare substantive rules of common law applicable in a state, whether they be local or general in their nature, be they commercial law or a part of the law of torts. [See A. Jur. Title “common Law,” § 5: R.C.L. title “Common Law.” § 4.] Appeal, § 976- remand for further consideration- propriety………Etc. (this can be found in any university library) page 1487 & 1500.
NOTICE: there is NO “Federal” common Law, the law of torts are the same as in military courts, which also pertains to and is the ROMAN LAW OF TORTS! Roman Catholic Law of Torts, Tribunals!
THE CLEARFIELD DOCTRINE WAS RECORDED IN THE AMERICAN LAW REPORT OF 1938.
THE DOCTRINE EXPLAINS: ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY V. HARRY J. TOMPKINS.
United States Supreme Court- April 25, 1938
All courts in this State and every other State of the Union, operate under the "Clearfield Doctrine" from the case of Clearfield Trust Co. v. US, 318 US 363, (1943).
The definition of "money" becomes extremely relevant once the above is known and understood. So, the question is now "What is the substance of the money used by the government entity coming against you"? "MONEY" as defined in the Constitution for the several States united at Article I, section 10, clause 1 or "MONEY" as defined in the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) adopted by your states legislature? In Michigan, see Michigan Compiled Laws section 440.1101, et seq., under definitions. The UCC itself states that its definitions are controlling over dictionary definitions.
"Governments descend to the level of a mere corporation, and take on the characteristics of a mere private citizen ... where private corporate commercial paper [Federal Reserve notes] and securities [checks] is concerned ...For the purposes of suit, such corporations and individuals are regarded as entities entirely separate from government.
-Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States 318 U.S. 363-371. Bank of US v. Planters Bank, 9 Wheaton (22US) 904, 6L.Ed. 24
CLEARFIELD DOCTRINE [8]
http://216.109.125.130/search/cache?p=belligerent+claimant+in+person%2Bwithout+prejudice&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=FP-tab-web-t500&x=wrt&u=www.arkenterprises.com/dialch83.html&w=belligerent+claimant+person+without+prejudice&d=f5L4EyQ8NWGA&icp=1&.intl=us
To:_________________________________ Re:_______________________
From: ______________________________ Date:______________________
NOTICE OF RESERVATION OF RIGHTS
This document serves as notice to the court, and all officers of the court, and all other public servants, and all other people and persons that are working for, or on behalf of any public trust corporation, that I know that I have Rights that I can Demand to have protected at all times, both by the court and the police departments who follow its policies. This document serves as notice that I hereby reserve all my rights without prejudice and order all courts and related people and persons to recognize, honor, and protect All My Rights, both today, and forever, as is in accordance with the Constitutions. Furthermore, a Quo Warranto is placed upon all actions that are taken against me that might cause me a legal disability, be it now or at any time in the future.
This is official notice that I Reserve All My Rights Without Prejudice. I refuse this or any other court, public servant or person, the Right to take any liberties with my Rights. I do not consent in any way to have my rights infringed upon. I do not give permission to construe anything I say or do as permission to Prejudice any of my Rights. Any lack of knowledge of the Law on my part at this time relating to My Rights shall not be construed as permission to take any liberties with any of my Rights. Before God, I make and proclaim this statement of My Reservation of Rights as fact and order all public service people and persons to abide by it.
Any infringement upon my Rights shall serve as prima facie evidence of Intent to Violate the Law. If any action is taken against me that causes me a disability and it is later determined that said actions, lack thereof, or any part thereof, are based on policy and not Law, this document shall serve as prima facie evidence of intent to willfully violate the Law. Each violation of my Rights shall created a separate claim for damages, which shall be deemed immediately due and payable to the injured party.
The following are two STATE OF OREGON administrative laws relevant to rights violations by public servants.
162.355 Simulating legal process. (1) A person commits the crime of simulating legal process if the person knowingly issues or delivers to another person any document that in form and substance falsely simulates civil or criminal process. (2) As used in this section: (a) "Civil or criminal process" means a document or order, including, but not limited to, a summons, lien, complaint, warrant, injunction, writ, notice, pleading or subpoena, that is issued by a court or that is filed or recorded for the purpose of: (A) Exercising jurisdiction; (B) Representing a claim against a person or property; (C) Directing a person to appear before a court or tribunal; or (D) Directing a person to perform or refrain from performing a specified act. (b) "Person" has the meaning given that term in ORS 161.015, except that in relation to a defendant, "person" means a human being, a public or private corporation, an unincorporated association, or a partnership. (3) Simulating legal process is a Class C felony 162.415 Official misconduct in the first degree. (1) A public servant commits the crime of official misconduct in the first degree if with intent to obtain a benefit or to harm another: (a) The public servant knowingly fails to perform a duty imposed upon the public servant by Law or one clearly inherent in the nature of office; or (b) The public servant knowingly performs an act constituting an unauthorized exercise in official duties. (2) Official misconduct in the first degree is a Class A misdemeanor. All officers of the court and peace officers, such as the sheriff and deputies and all municipal private peace officers, such as all people hired for that purpose by a public corporation, such as City and State Police, are deemed to have a duty to know and uphold the law and protect the rights of the people around them.
Any violation of My Rights, or Failure to Stop Another from Violating Them, by a Public Servant Who Has the Legal Duty and Power to Protect Those Rights, Shall Constitute a crime. Such crime shall serve as prima facie evidence that said Public Servant does intend to, and shall, create claims on behalf of the injured party(s), for damages as follows; 1. $100,000.00 or the maximum allowed by the Administrative Tort Laws of this incorporated State against any applicable performance or security bond the Public Servant is operating under and, 2. $3,500.00 or the maximum amount allowed by
the Administrative Laws of this incorporated State in a Small Claims Court. 3. Said Actions Shall Create a Claim for Damages That Can Be Collected by Filing a Suit under the Jurisdiction of the Uniform Commercial Code for Violation of My Common Law Rights, in the Local or Federal courts. 4. It shall also serve as prima facie evidence that said Public Servant intends for the injured party to File Deprivation of Rights Suit, Directly in administrative (Federal) Court for the incorporated US Government for further redress of injuries. All claims shall be valid and enforceable simultaneously as allowed by Law. Authorities that have not been overturned: Norton vs. Shelby County 118 U.S. 425 An unconstitutional act is not Law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.
Owen vs. Independence 100 S.C.T. 1398 Officers of the court have no immunity, when violating a Constitutional Right, from liability. For they are deemed to know the Law.
Jackson, J., West Virginia State Board of Education vs. Barnette 1943 319 US 624, 638 87L ed 1628, 1638, 63 S Ct 1178, 147 ALR 674 "The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials, and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections." JONES V. COUNCE, 7 F3d 1359 (8th Cir. 1993) BENITEZ V. WOLFF, 985 F3d 662 (2nd Cir. 1993) Qualified immunity defense fails if public officer violates clearly established right, because a reasonably competent official should know Law governing this conduct.
United State vs. Johnson, 76 Federal Register, Supplement 538 Rights are neither accorded to the passive resistant, nor the person who is ignorant of his Rights, nor to the one indifferent thereto. It is a fighting clause. Its benefits can only be retained by sustained combat. It cannot be claimed by an attorney or solicitor. It is valid only when insisted upon by a belligerent claimant in person. "Without Prejudice" UCC 1-207.4 "All Rights Reserved" When I use "Without Prejudice" UCC 1-207 in connection with my signature, I am saying: "I reserve my right not to be compelled to perform under any contract or commercial agreement that I did not enter knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally. And furthermore, I do not accept the liability of the compelled benefit of any unrevealed contract or commercial agreement." "The Sufficiency of the Reservation: any expression indicating an intention to reserve rights, is sufficient, such as "Without Prejudice" (UCC-1-207-.4) or "All Rights Reserved." "the making of a valid Reservation of Right preserves whatever rights the person then possesses, and prevents the loss of such right by application of concepts of waiver or estoppel." (UCC 1-207.7)
This Document Is Law, and Must Be Obeyed by Anyone Who has a Public
Servant Job, and in Particular, Any and All Public Servants Who Have Taken an Oath to Uphold the Constitutions of this state and the united States but shall not be avoided for lack of an oath. Further Authorities: Whereas, the exercise of a natural right needs no authority in America other than the Constitution.
Whereas, Art. 1, Sect. 21 of the Constitution for Oregon, "...nor shall any law be passed, the taking effect of which shall be made to depend upon any authority, except as provided in this Constitution;...". Since this is the underlying principle of all American law upon which Accused is standing, the issue of lawful authority over the body and other properties of Accused cannot be ignored.
Whereas, Accused reserves all rights given him by God and protected by the Constitution for the Republican Union, and the republic of Oregon which places definite and unbridgeable limits upon the law making and enforcement abilities of any government body or corporate entity operating in accordance with and under color of American Law.
Whereas, if the STATE OF OREGON decides to mediate or decide the alleged claim against Accused, Accused reserves and exercises his sovereign power to demand that the STATE OF OREGON and JOSEPHINE COUNTY provide full disclosure of the source of the authority upon which all actions were taken. Full disclosure means; absolute in detail from its source.
Whereas, under American Law, the Accused recognizes that codes, rules and statutes are only administrative in nature and are not the actual Constitutional Laws with proper enacting clauses. Such codes, rules, and statutes, as applied as mandatory obligatory conditions to the Accused, in which the Accused is placed under a legal disability over the objections of the Accused, or thru fraud and deception, is an act of slavery.
Whereas, Accused objects to, and reserves the Right not to be subjected to slavery and reserves all Lawful Rights of redress for any act of slavery imposed upon their person and/or other properties.
Further Notice: Whereas, the STATE OF OREGON operates upon some other system of law other than the Constitutional Common Law in which Accused has Rights secure in the Bill of Rights, Accused demands to know the following: (A) Exactly what system of law is the STATE OF OREGON operating under, (B) What system of law is being used to limit the Rights of Accused, if different from (A), (C) What system of law Accused is being prosecuted for violating, if different from (A), (D) What system of law
Accused is being prosecuted under, if different from (A), and (E) How that system of law(s) apply to Accused, who understands himself to be a Man with all the Rights given him by God and protected by the Constitutions for the republic of Oregon and the republican union known as the United States.
Accused reminds the court that there is no "half-pregnant" in the law, and that to deny Accused access to the STATE OF OREGON's and JOSEPHINE COUNTY's law and thereby access to a defense, wherein an obligation such as a debt or service obligation is forced upon Accused is, in law, an act and declaration of slavery against Accused (42 USC, §1994 "...directly or indirectly, the voluntary or involuntary service or labor of any persons as peons, in liquidation of any debt or obligation, or otherwise, are declared null and void.")
Accused further reminds the court that pursuant to law, actors engaged in any form of slavery lose all immunities from criminal prosecution and civil judgments, and any corporation, municipal or otherwise, that condones any act of slavery by any of its agents or employees is subject to civil judgments under the law.
Relief Demanded:
If the court cannot, or will not comply with an American and internationally recognized 'in Law' and commercial law mandate for full disclosure, then Accused demands the court to dismiss its claim upon its own motion because JOSEPHINE COUNTY, thru its representative, failed to state a claim upon which Accused is obligated to grant relief and further failed to state a claim in a court of competent jurisdiction to grant obligatory relief.
Authority:
The Corporate State is moving in its own name in a criminal action and not Ex Rel on behalf of the People of Oregon under and in accordance with the common law.
In the mid 1990's, the State of Oregon, Inc., entered into a commercial enterprise with all of the other State of Oregon public corporations, such as the Oregon State Police, the Department of Transportation, SOSCF, etc. in which the retirement accounts/programs known as the Public Employee Retirement System, (PERS), were combined and invested in the stock market in a for-profit commercial enterprise. As a result: (A) The State of Oregon is no longer operating in its lawfully mandated role as a non-profit public corporation. (B) The State of Oregon judges and the State of Oregon
District Attorneys, court administrators, clerks, etc. all have an interest in maintaining the same retirement account.
Furthermore:
A percentage of every fine levied in Oregon, by a State of Oregon court, goes directly into the PERS account. As a result, the District Attorneys office and all of the State of Oregon judges, every Oregon State Police officer, SOSCF worker, etc., have a vested interest in assessing fines and using the State of Oregon's private corporate courts for finding people guilty, as they each acquire personal gain from every conviction.
And Finally:
A percentage of all fines go into the State of Oregon, Inc. general fund upon which the state plans its operating budget, and also, certain administrative agencies, such as the Oregon State Police, get a certain percentage of all fines placed directly into their operating budget.
Therefore:
The State of Oregon is involved in using its courts and jails as tools for an
extremely unlawful revenue collection and an undisclosed taxation system.
Accused states that being subjected over his express objections to such a system of codes, rules, statutes and the accompanying enforcement court system is an act of slavery.
Accused again notices everyone that he reserves the God-given and Lawfully protected Right that is endowed upon himself and all Mankind not to be subjected to slavery. Constitution for the united States Art. 3, Sect. 2, Clause 2: "In all cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be a party, the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction."
By____________________________________ Date:______________________
Raymond Ronald Karczewski©
Secured Party/Creditor/Holder in Due Course and Authorized Representative for the
Debtor/Defendant RAYMOND RONALD KARCZEWSKI©
Reply
8:17 AM | UCC CODE AND RULE 53 REFORM
Bad Judges Have To Go
From: Marilyn LeBaron
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 12:35 AM
To: kmagdaleno@ocsd.org
Subject: Fw: From OCSD Internet
Yuwie
http://www.yuwie.com/yuwie.asp?r=268928&vid=1365498
Hit SIGN UP under the feet of Yuwie guy, enter your information, verify your account with the link sent to your e-mail account.
Please forgive the advertisements and junk mail.
(Hit 'SKIP' at the bottom of the page or No Thanks)
Hit the back button to get out of pop ups
From: ON A MISSION
Date: Dec 28, 2007 2:14 PM
me getting this message was no mistake today! i have been sitting here all day wondering were to lead this woman too. i have suggested a pition and letters to someone higher than the jusde on her case please go to her page maybe you or someone u know can help her further. please let her know i have asked you to help!
regards, her url is
MySpace URL:
http://www.myspace.com/victimsofabuse
missy
From: LORD.OF.THE.JURY
Date: Dec 28, 2007 4:59 PM
IMPEACH A CORRUPT JUDGE TODAY
http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=152020542&blogID=339554385
Real American MySpace Blog
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=152020542
Child Welfare Topic Link to watch videos on
http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog&friendID=152020542&Mytoken=43E12C18-179A-42D5-84E2BD5A6378C61D46886807
I live in Portland Oregon. Hey!
IMPEACH A CORRUPT JUDGE TODAY
http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=152020542&blogID=339554385
Real American MySpace Blog
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=152020542
Child Welfare Topic Link to watch videos on
http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog&friendID=152020542&Mytoken=43E12C18-179A-42D5-84E2BD5A6378C61D46886807
I live in Portland Oregon. Hey!
From: MAD-at-CPS
Date: Dec 26, 2007 9:31 PM
..
From: zen zeraman
Date: Dec 26, 2007 5:45 PM
From: MAD-at-CPS
RE: MAY GOD HELP US ALL
From: 9/11 IT'S TIME TO KNOW
From: Grandparents Have Rights Too! G.S.G.,, FLA.
Please click on the picture below to get to the petition site!
..
Please click on the picture below to get to the petition site!
..
Please click on the picture below to get to the petition site!
..
Please click on the picture below to get to the petition site!
..
From: Judge_the_Bench
Behold a Silent Scream
From: stephen a
Date: 21 Dec 2007, 06:01
From: Judge_the_Bench
Date: Dec 21, 2007 7:00 AM
Please Post and Re-Post [our] Silent Scream
[ Behold a silent scream! ]
Press Forward, get the code, cut & paste, put in your Bulletin, put on your comments, put on your profile please.
grace n angels_ READY to work for the abused.
Date: 20 Dec 2007, 03:04
Narrative re: Removal of SabrinaPlease help me get my little
Body: Name Comment
Nancy
Dec 19, 2007 9:45 PM
Please help me get my little daughter back
Current mood: sad
Category: News and Politics
On April 3, 2005, Sabrina was born to Nancy Hey. She weighed 7 lb. 4 oz. Mother and baby were released from the hospital on April 5, 2005. On April 8, 2005, Ms. Hey took Sabrina to the pediatrician for a regular post-birth follow-up. The baby had lost weight (from 7lb. 4oz. to 6lb. 12oz.) so the pediatrician recommended supplementation with formula (Ms. Hey was nursing) and a follow-up visit several days later. Ms. Hey saw the pediatrician three more times after that initial visit. Although Sabrina's weight only dropped to 6 lb. 10 oz., she did not exhibit a sustained weight gain. As a result, on that third visit, the doctor who saw Ms. Hey and Sabrina indicated that Sabrina's weight loss and lack of sustained weight gain was more significant than Ms. Hey had been led to believe and he instructed Ms. Hey to admit Sabrina to the hospital.
So, on April 16, 2005, Sabrina and Ms. Hey were admitted to Virginia Hospital Center. Sabrina was admitted with a failure to thrive diagnosis. After increasing the amount of formula used to supplement Ms. Hey's breast feeding, Sabrina gained weight. On April 19, Ms. Hey was visited by a social worker from the Arlington County Child Protective Services. On April 20, Ms. Hey and her live-in companion, Kit Slitor, (not the biological father of the baby) were compelled to sign a "Safety Plan" presented to them by the Arlington County CPS social worker. They were informed a refusal to sign would prevent the baby from being discharged. The following day, Ms. Hey and Sabrina were released from the hospital. On the date of release, Sabrina weighed 7 lb. 5 oz.
On April 22, the social worker and one or more home nurses visited the family. The social worker returned the next day, Saturday, April 23; however, Ms. Hey and
Comment Back - Send Message - Block User - Delete My Comment
Rosie (RE..
Dec 18, 2007
When you find somebody with CPS Problems:
(Please forward and post or Blog)
._ ---_.
Please Tell Them
._ ---_.
You have been invited to join: Legal Literacy
._ ---_.
_--------------------------------------_
http://r.yuwie.com/antigov
_--------------------------------------_
._ ---_. We have a NATIONAL CRISIS ._ ---_.
This crisis is not covered aggressively in the Allied Press.
._ ---_.
I'm sick.
._ ---_.
Judiciaries are the most responsible! .
_ ---_.
They just got together and voted for more immunity!
._ ---_.
I don't know what is wrong with these CPS social workers!
They seem to have no heart. They are trained in Marxism and Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely. Yes, it does.
._ ---_.
Did you know how to join the CPS Class Action?
There is one in every state organizing.
._ ---_.
A woman with a learning disability can lose her children.Movies
Television "Aaron Russo's "Aaron Russo's Mad as Hell", 1943 -- 2007
on MySpaceIM you can get it here www.myspace.com/myspaceim my username is fffmf
RIP Aaron Russo February 14, 1943 -- August 24, 2007
Born in Brooklyn and raised on Long Island, producer Aaron Russo began promoting rock and roll shows at local theaters while still a high school student. He then worked for his family's undergarment business, where in 1963, he designed the first ladies bikini under wear. Five years later the twenty four year old entrepreneur opened his own nightclub in Chicago called the Kinetic Playground, which became a driving force in the music business, where Aaron helped create the careers of many legendary performers, such as Led Zeppelin. Aaron was responsible for bringing them to America for the first time. He also promoted some of the 60's most successful rock acts, including The Who, Janis Joplin, The Grateful Dead and Jefferson Airplane.
In 1972, Russo began his seven year partnership with Bette Midler, who became a superstar during his management of her career. In 1975 he produced the Tony award- winning "Clams on the Half-Shell Revue," which starred Bette Midler and Lionel Hampton. At the time it was the most successful ten-week broadway revue in history, grossing more than $1.8 million. While serving as Midler's manager, Russo created and managed the Manhattan Transfer. Later his roster would include such personalities as David Keith, Frederic Forest, Susan Sarandon and other notable clients.
When Russo turned to producing feature films, his production of "The Rose", introduced Bette Midler to motion picture audiences. Midler received an Academy Award nomination as best actress. "The Rose" is considered by many to be the classic rock n' roll film. Russo also produced "Trading Places," starring Eddie Murphy and Dan Aykroyd, which has become a Christmas classic, and "Teachers," starring Nick Nolte, Morgan Freeman, and Ralph Macchio.
Over the past years, Russo has received numerous awards for his achievements. They include a Grammy, a Tony, an Emmy for producing the best television special of the year "OL' Red Hair is Back," starring Dustin Hoffman and Bette Midler, plus many gold and platinum records. To date his films have been nominated for six Academy Awards, as well as seven Golden Globes. His films have won three Golden Globes, as well as the Image Award.
He wrote, produced, and directed a feature film/documentary titled "America...From Freedom To Fascism". The film is an expose of the Internal Revenue Service, and proves conclusively there is no law requiring an American citizen to pay a direct un apportioned Tax on their labor. The film is very provocative and is received standing ovations at its previews.
You can watch the film for free on Google video. Just search: freedom to fascism.
In 1996 Russo made a political video entitled "Aaron Russo's Mad as Hell", which was a hit throughout America. He was asked by the people of Nevada to run for governor and he made the decision to do so. The powers that be in Nevada scoffed at his decision to run for governor but were very surprised when he finished second with nearly thirty percent of the vote, beating the sitting lieutenant governor. In January of 2004, he declared his candidacy for the Libertarian Party's nomination for President of the Untied States. At the Convention in May, Russo won the first two ballots, but not a majority. He was defeated on the third and final ballot. He then channeled his energy into writing/directing America: From Freedom to Fascism.
Aaron will be fondly remembered and never forgotten as a courageous, kind and brilliant individual. His work for the fight for freedom will continue in the efforts of those he helped to inspire.
For more information on the fight against tyranny, visit: www.infowars.com
www.ronpaul.com
www.nineeleven.co.uk
Books .. Heroes MY COMPLAINT: SENT TO THE POLICE IN THE STATE OF OREGON *********** -----Original Message-----
From: Marilyn LeBaron ..
To: DTallan@ci.monmouth.or.us; asoldiersmom@brianpshaver.com
Cc: dogettydoggonedo ..; julie.a.witherspoon@us.army.mil
Sent: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 11:09 pm
Subject: Pages of petitions to abolish the Death Penalty...
...relevancy?
...to a policeman’s Oath of Office...
...to family law? ...to CPS Reform? ...to RULE 53 REFROM?
...what is the equivalent of the death penalty according to Supreme Court?
http://cid-20b2e37fd5a5c5a3.spaces.live.com/Photos/cns!20B2E37FD5A5C5A3!136/
Tuesday, November 13, 2007
Equal Protection of the Law v Psychology (The Supreme Law of the Land?)
Dear MONMOUTH POLICE DEPARTMENT,
38 E Jackson Street, Monmouth OR 97361
503.838.1109
Dear MONMOUTH POLICE DEPARTMENT,
C/O Sgt. Pomeroy,
http://www.PetitionOnline.com/families/petition.html
Read endorsements #999 & 666 & #s 774, 775
The LeBaron family did not deserve the death penalty! My son! My Daughter! My Grand Baby!
Nor do parents getting the equivalent...
ALL OVER THIS NATION!!!!!!!!!!!
http://www.freeourkids.com/youtube/1.htm
MUNICIPAL POLICE ARE RESPONSIBLE!!!!!!!!!! (TOO)
This is my Political Complaint.
Parents need 'the equivalent of a grand jury indictment' if they are going to get the 'equivalent OF the Death Penalty'.
That is the equivalent of equal protection of the law, which is the equivalent of Your Oath of Office....
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
STOP LOOK AND LISTEN
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LISTEN TO THE $$$$$$$
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CPS Class Action!!!
28 Million Americans complaining in ignorance!
POLICE MEN! PLEASE UPHOLD YOUR OATH OF OFFICE!
EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW
PLEASE UPHOLD AND DEFEND
JUDGE THE BENCH / BENCH THE JUDGE!
IF A PERSON IS GOING TO GET PUT TO DEATH THEY GET A GRAND JURY INDICTMENT.
THE EQUIVALENT OF THE DEATH PENALTY IS TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS.....
For comparison see Care2.com for pages and pages of petitions to abolish the Death Penalty.
So, the equivalent would be abolishing the Judicial Power to Terminate Parental Rights.
Don't you agree that would be equal protection?
SOS SOS SOS
A NATION IN CRISIS... MUNICIPAL POLICE ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ESCORTING
CPS CASEWORKERS TO THE HOMES OF MILLIONS OF AMERICAN FAMILIES, WHO HAD THEIR FAMILIES RIPPED APART FOR THE SAKE OF JUVENILE CRIME PREVENTION. SEE: ORS CHARTER FOR LEGISLATIVE INTENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES.
HOW MANY TEENS DO YOU KNOW WHO DESERVE THE DEATH PENALTY OR THE EQUIVALENT?
WATCH THE $$$$ SIGNS PLEASE $$$$
JUDGES ARE COSTING US MILLIONS EACH YEAR
AND
MAKING ADOPTION AGENCIES
AND
THEIR ATTORNEYS RICH.
WATCH THE $$$$ DOLLAR SIGNS PLEASE
Here two of my Blogs...
http://blog.myspace.com/dogettydoggonedo
http://journals.aol.com/madatcps/thomas-alexander-bleu-lebaron--m/
Tuesday, November 13, 2007
Psychology the 'Wild Card' 'in' the Place of Law & Order.
Category: Religion and Philosophy
"Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly,"
Psychology the 'Wild Card' 'in' the Place of Law & Order.
( TWO COUNTS )
Dear Amer-eeka,
Here is a copy of what I sent to to Joi who contacted me on MySpace.
At the end of this is another person's troubles with the State of California.
Same issue... Psychology the 'Wild Card'.
Oregon DHS never told me what the allegation was with the exception,
"We want your signature on a release of information". "We know you see a shrink". That is the bottom line. Later, about eight months later, they brought the Police to my house intending to demand the judiciary hand their Agency control of my Privileged relationships.
Chandra Snyder, Supervisory Staff, author of Petition III, (Judge too at the search warrant stage assigning the case back to Marry Anne E. Miller, ignoring my complaints of perjury). Snyder wrote in the first drafted Petition, "Make her sign".
Chandra Snyder personally kept the argument going after refusing to
reply to my letters because the case was CLOSED. She personally
refused to respond to the 'volume of my letters', as she put it, in which
I asked for the Psychologist on Staff seeking a specific person to deal
with not just 'DHS' on the release, to prevent everybody in the
employment of Child Protective Services to have access to my private
information. Case law will show the DHS have no power on that fine
technicality, which if not kept in check will mow right over our right to
'not' contract. (Something to pay very close attention to).
I was going to sign the release of information but Matt L. Hawkins,
Juvenile Department Probation Officer, pulled the paperwork out of my
hands just before I signed it on January 25, 2005. He set it down on his
desk after explaining to Marry Ann E. Miller that I had taken his name of
the three-way conversation and told her of other changes as well. I did
not hear her ask him to include himself on the release, which points to
they collaborated before I got there. Hawkins filled out the release at
Miller's request and Marry Anne E Miller, who was present, when I was
making changes is in witness to all that went on just prior and look
disinterested in to subject when Hawkins told her what I wrote. Neither
of them said more about it after the document was set down. I went to
asking what the concern was.
A week later, without telling me her concern Marry Anne E. Miller said
I was a 'MAJOR SAFETY THREAT' and in her reports she states I refused
to allow them to speak to my doctor, which is perjury. I said to her
repeatedly, "You need to talk to my doctor about that" (about six times).
I confirmed to her, "Yes, I'll sign a release of information".
She also sent a FAX about two weeks later out to Redmond Oregon,
where my son was taken by his father for a 'birthday celebration', before
they staffed my case, which shows she had motive to leverage herself and
teamed up with my adversary. This all after she filed a completed
assessment and did not note any Supervisory Extensions for her to continue
assessing. He allegation arose after her completed assessment was logged in
which there was no mention of an eminent threat. The Staffing took place
after she closed the matter, file a report at the Governor's Advocacy Office
in which she stated, UNABLE TO DETERMINE to be the Disposition of my
case, "No Reasonable Cause to Believe Child Abuse or Neglect Had
Occurred". Marry Anne E Miller directly contradicted herself that report
and no body paid any attention to the rules of Due Process or the definition
of impeachment, especially the Judge Horner.
I filled in the release limiting access to their immediate concerns, which
is my right to presentment directly adjacent to my right to confront the
witnesses against me on the topic of 'current' conditions and circumstances
and eminent threat. This goes to weather or not I can identify and
manage those threats, too. The only thing said to me when I asked,
"What is your concern?" is, "I'm concerned you cannot follow a
conversation", in very nasty under tones after being yelled at right in
front of my daughter by Matt L. Hawkins.
SOCIAL SERVICES EXPERT they call themselves.
All Rights Reserved
Without Prejudice
UCC 1-308
Marilyn LeBaron
PS DMV is on the look out for the above phrase. I hope to see it
wherever you sign your name. We all should use it.
http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog&pop=1&ping=1&indicate=1
Dear Joi,
Here is a copy of what I sent to you from MySpace.
At the end of this is another person's troubles with the State of California.
Same issue... Psychology the 'Wild Card'.
Oregon DHS never told me what the allegation was with the exception,
"We want your signature on a release of information". “We know you
see a shrink”. That is the bottom line. Later, about eight months later,
they brought the Police to my house intending to demand the judiciary
hand their Agency control of my Privileged relationships.
Chandra Snyder, Supervisory Staff, author of Petition III, (Judge too at
the search warrant stage assigning the case back to Marry Anne E. Miller,
ignoring my complaints of perjury). Snyder wrote in the first drafted Petition,
“Make her sign”.
Chandra Snyder personally kept the argument going after refusing to reply
to my letters because the case was CLOSED. She personally refused to
respond to the ‘volume of my letters’, as she put it, in which I asked for the
Psychologist on Staff seeking a specific person to deal with not just 'DHS'
on the release, to prevent everybody in the employment of Child Protective
Services to have access to my private information. Case law will show the
DHS have no power on that fine technicality, which if not kept in check will
mow right over our right to 'not' contract.
(Something to pay very close attention to).
I was going to sign the release of information but Matt L. Hawkins,
Juvenile Department Probation Officer, pulled the paperwork out of my
hands just before I signed it on January 25, 2005. He set it down on his
desk after explaining to Marry Ann E. Miller that I had taken his name of
the three-way conversation and told her of other changes as well. I did
not hear her ask him to include himself on the release, which points to
they collaborated before I got there. Hawkins filled out the release at
Miller’s request and Marry Anne E Miller, who was present, when I was
making changes is in witness to all that went on just prior and look
disinterested in to subject when Hawkins told her what I wrote. Neither
of them said more about it after the document was set down. I went to
asking what the concern was.
A week later, without telling me her concern Marry Anne E. Miller said
I was a 'MAJOR SAFETY THREAT' and in her reports she states I refused
to allow them to speak to my doctor, which is perjury. I said to her
repeatedly, “You need to talk to my doctor about that” (about six times).
I confirmed to her, “Yes, I’ll sign a release of information”.
She also sent a FAX about two weeks later out to Redmond Oregon,
where my son was taken by his father for a 'birthday celebration', before
they staffed my case, which shows she had motive to leverage herself
and teamed up with my adversary. This all after she filed a completed
assessment and did not note any Supervisory Extensions for her to
continue assessing. He allegation arose after her completed assessment
was logged in which there was no mention of an eminent threat. The
Staffing took place after she closed the matter, file a report at the
Governor’s Advocacy Office in which she stated, UNABLE TO DETERMINE
to be the Disposition of my case, "No Reasonable Cause to Believe Child
Abuse or Neglect Had Occurred". Marry Anne E Miller directly contradicted
herself that report and no body paid any attention to the rules of Due
Process or the definition of impeachment, especially the Judge Horner.
I filled in the release limiting access to their immediate concerns, which
is my right to presentment directly adjacent to my right to confront the
witnesses against me on the topic of 'current' conditions and circumstances
and eminent threat. This goes to weather or not I can identify and manage
those threats, too. The only thing said to me when I asked, "What is your
concern?” is, "I'm concerned you cannot follow a conversation", in very
nasty under tones after being yelled at right in front of my daughter by
Matt L. Hawkins.
SOCIAL SERVICE EXPERT they call themselves.
All Rights Reserved
Without Prejudice
UCC 1-308
Marilyn LeBaron
PS DMV is on the look out for the above phrase. I hope to see it
wherever you sign your name. We all should use it.
----------------- Original Message -----------------
From: joi
Date: Nov 9, 2007 6:15 PM
I have read what was provided but am having issue with the lack of charges proffered.
I didn't see that they were clearly spelled out. I am a paralegal and as such this has me rather curious.
I can be found at (e-mail address omitted)
Namaste
joi
Here is another case where 'Psychology is used as a 'Wild Card' in the place of Law & Order'.
-----Original Message-----
From: Witherspoon, Julie A SPC RES USAR USARC ..
To: madatcps@aol.com
Sent: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 11:46 am
Subject: Fwd: CORRUPTION IN YOUR COMMAND
Attached Message
From: julie.a.witherspoon@us.army.mil
To: christian.wolfe@us.army.mil
Subject: CORRUPTION IN YOUR COMMAND
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 11:28:01 -0800
Dear Mr. Wolfe
Your time of hiding and sweeping high crimes under the rug and plunder is over.
On 24th July 2006 my 2 children Danny James Witherspoon born 6-17-96 and
Julie Ann Witherspoon2 born 9-21-94 have been kidnapped and flown across
international borders due to false allegations brought on by my former
Company Commander Gerald Duenas and the Social Work GS employee Mr.
Todd Baumann.
1 I was sexually harassed by an E-7 Mr. Greg Smith while on deployment to
OIF. Mr. Smith when did not get his way with me started fabricating false
allegations along with frivolous punishments to be attached with by his doing.
Yes I did exercise E.O. and the IG departments they did so much as to warn my
chain of command that they shall not further assassinate my character when it
holds no validity.
2 During the time of redeployment Mr. Greg Smith had strongly influenced a
new commander Gerald Duenas to carry on the torch of executing my Character.
I had suffered a great deal of torture and harassment by my chain of command.
I had begged CSM Penn and Critzter and before hand Jim Kinkade about removing
me out the hostile work environment and I was denied each and every time.
3 on July 18th 2006 my Daughter became suddenly ill due to a flu virus and I
had brought my child into a German Hospital and she was admitted. On the
20th I had been suddenly stricken with the same illness but I could not go into
the Hospital for I had my Son to care for. On the 22nd of July my Son was also
stricken with the same illness and he was also admitted into the hospital with
my daughter.
On July 24th 2006 Mr. Todd Baumann arrived at the Hospital with Gerald Duenas
and Ivan La Gares Gomez and SFC Williams. Mr. Todd Baumann was holding a
blank sheet of paper and his exact words were, "I received a phone call the other
day and somebody said you were drunk and Im taking your kids away" My
response was, “Is this a joke? let me see a court documents that authorizes
you to act so? Mr. Baumann replied " I don’t need one" I said well your going
to need a little more than a phone call and then I stated I want league Council
Mr. Baumann stated "That’s not an option for you" I asked 2 more times and he
replied with the same statement. I then stated to Mr. Baumann since he cannot
produce a court order or any type of legal document he is now trespassing and
I advised him he should leave at once. I picked up my phone and proceeded to
call the police and Duenas had knocked the phone out of my hand and Duenas
stated " We don’t need any authorities here we have everything under control"
My 2 children were absolutely terrified of these (men) and my children started to
grab on to me for dear life and that’s when Duenas told my Son "Let go of your
Fucking Mother Now!" My Son said get your hands off of me and Duenas grabbed
my sons arm with the IV in it and Duenas twisted my sons arm but my son broke
loose and held on to me and that’s when Duenas grabbed my Son by the throat
and threw him across the room in front of Todd Baumann and Todd Baumann stated
to Duenas "Don’t worry I didn’t see anything" I said to Baumann "Bullshit!" and your
supposed to protect children? Baumann said to me " I don’t know what your talking
about" at that point with my children being terrorized they escorted me away from
my children while Duenas was on the Phone with the MPs asking them if they can
lock me up at Manheim and they couldn’t because no crime has been taken place.
Duenas and his accomplices rustled me into a van drove me to Landstuhl and Duenas once again with the false allegations told or convinced the ER personal that he has a soldier that was suicidal. They incarcerated me in the physic ward from 27th July Aug 1st. On Aug 1st Duenas and Lagares Gomez showed up and Duenas said I got your hildren out of the country now you can get out of here. Duenas explained to me that he took it upon himself to unlawfully enter my home and steal Pass Port documents and birth documents of my children and he stated that he had put my children on an airplane all by themselves and flew them out of the country into a known pedophiles hand which is my x husband who molested my Daughter.
Still till this day SIR! I have still not received once shred of legal documentation from Baumann on what authority he acted upon nor have I received an opportunity
for a hearing from the Magistrate nor was there an investigation conducted no DUE PROCESS whatsoever and Denial of Legal Council and furthermore I was falsely
accused on multiple occasions and under the HAGUE PETITION international laws and treaty’s have been violated and under U.S. Laws and UCMJ has also been violated.
Just to inform you SIR! since these unlawful events have transpired under you command and anyone such as yourself with an OATH who AIDS these individuals who committed these high crimes shall be held liable as well as the individuals who acted ABOVE and BEYOND their realm of authority.
We are all equal under the law! we are all equal under UCMJ! We all have an OATH of DUTY we are sworn to. Just because an individual holds certain rank or position does not give you access to ABUSE YOUR POWER.
I have written statements of Military and Civilian Personal of the malfeasance that has occurred by the hands of these individuals I also possess Mp3 recordings of their own unedited voices.
This is my P.O.C. 626-817-1441
Julie Witherspoon
AuntyBLAWGwar
PS This is Brian Shaver. He has need of justice, too... His mother is on a mission. A mission to Bring him home to rest.
Action Needed
If you and all who take notice, who being without the need for immediate government assistance, see your fellow men, myself and other parents, bound in that which you care not to see your posterity entrapped or caused to flee from such entanglements, either by contract or breech thereof, so shall ye say.
"This is unconscionable and destructive to find no meaningful end". "I do not consent". "My children do not consent". "My neighbor will not consent".
"The will of the governed, I, my friends, my neighbors, on behalf of our posterity call out to our constituents, to Congress, to our Public Servants, "We are all bound by the same Compact”. “Under which we are all equal in the sight of the Law”. “So shall the foregoing demand be interpreted:”
“NOTICE OF RESERVATION OF RIGHTS or have Perjury and Prejudice In Place of 'In God We Trust'".
Category: Religion and Philosophy
NOTICE OF RESERVATION OF RIGHTS
This document serves as notice to the court, and all officers of the court, and all other public servants, and all other people and persons that are working for, or on behalf of any public trust corporation, that I know that I have Rights that I can Demand to have protected at all times, both by the court and the police departments who follow its policies. This document serves as notice that I hereby reserve all my rights without prejudice and order all courts and related people and persons to recognize, honor, and protect All My Rights, both today, and forever, as is in accordance with the Constitutions. Furthermore, a Quo Warranto is placed upon all actions that are taken against me that might cause me a legal disability, be it now or at any time in the future.
This is official notice that I Reserve All My Rights Without Prejudice. I refuse this or any other court, public servant or person, the Right to take any liberties with my Rights. I do not consent in any way to have my rights infringed upon. I do not give permission to construe anything I say or do as permission to Prejudice any of my Rights. Any lack of knowledge of the Law on my part at this time relating to My Rights shall not be construed as permission to take any liberties with any of my Rights. Before God, I make and proclaim this statement of My Reservation of Rights as fact and order all public service people and persons to abide by it.
Any infringement upon my Rights shall serve as prima facie evidence of Intent to Violate the Law. If any action is taken against me that causes me a disability and it is later determined that said actions, lack thereof, or any part thereof, are based on policy and not Law, this document shall serve as prima facie evidence of intent to willfully violate the Law. Each violation of my Rights shall create a separate claim for damages, which shall be deemed immediately due and payable to the injured party.
The following are two STATE OF OREGON administrative laws relevant to rights violations by public servants.
162.355 Simulating legal process. (1) A person commits the crime of simulating legal process if the person knowingly issues or delivers to another person any document that in form and substance falsely simulates civil or criminal process. (2) As used in this section: (a) "Civil or criminal process" means a document or order, including, but not limited to, a summons, lien, complaint, warrant, injunction, writ, notice, pleading or subpoena, that is issued by a court or that is filed or recorded for the purpose of:
(A) Exercising jurisdiction; (B) Representing a claim against a person or property; (C) Directing a person to appear before a court or tribunal; or (D) Directing a person to perform or refrain from performing a specified act. (b) "Person" has the meaning given that term in ORS 161.015, except that in relation to a defendant, "person" means a human being, a public or private corporation, an unincorporated association, or a partnership. (3) Simulating legal process is a Class C felony 162.415 Official misconduct in the first degree. (1) A public servant commits the crime of official misconduct in the first degree if with intent to obtain a benefit or to harm another: (a) The public servant knowingly fails to perform a duty imposed upon the public servant by Law or one clearly inherent in the nature of office; or (b) The public servant knowingly performs an act constituting an unauthorized exercise in official duties. (2) Official misconduct in the first degree is a Class A misdemeanor. All officers of the court and peace officers, such as the sheriff and deputies and all municipal private peace officers, such as all people hired for that purpose by a public corporation, such as City and State Police, are deemed to have a duty to know and uphold the law and protect the rights of the people around them.
Any violation of My Rights, or Failure to Stop Another from Violating Them, by a Public Servant Who Has the Legal Duty and Power to Protect Those Rights, Shall Constitute a crime. Such crime shall serve as prima facie evidence that said Public Servant does intend to, and shall, create claims on behalf of the injured party(s), for damages as follows; 1. $100,000.00 or the maximum allowed by the Administrative Tort Laws of this incorporated State against any applicable performance or security bond the Public Servant is operating under and, 2. $3,500.00 or the maximum amount allowed by the Administrative Laws of this incorporated State in a Small Claims Court. 3. Said Actions Shall Create a Claim for Damages That Can Be Collected by Filing a Suit under the Jurisdiction of the Uniform Commercial Code for Violation of My Common Law Rights, in the Local or Federal courts. 4. It shall also serve as prima facie evidence that said Public Servant intends for the injured party to File Deprivation of Rights Suit, Directly in administrative (Federal) Court for the incorporated US Government for further redress of injuries. All claims shall be valid and enforceable simultaneously as allowed by Law.
Authorities that have not been overturned: Norton vs. Shelby County 118 U.S. 425 An unconstitutional act is not Law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.
Owen vs. Independence 100 S.C.T. 1398 Officers of the court have no immunity, when violating a Constitutional Right, from liability. For they are deemed to know the Law.
Jackson, J., West Virginia State Board of Education vs. Barnette 1943 319 US 624, 638 87L ed 1628, 1638, 63 S Ct 1178, 147 ALR 674 "The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials, and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections." JONES V. COUNCE, 7 F3d 1359 (8th Cir. 1993) BENITEZ V. WOLFF, 985 F3d 662 (2nd Cir. 1993) Qualified immunity defense fails if public officer violates clearly established right, because a reasonably competent official should know Law governing this conduct.
United State vs. Johnson, 76 Federal Register, Supplement 538 Rights are neither accorded to the passive resistant, nor the person who is ignorant of his Rights, nor to the one indifferent thereto. It is a fighting clause. Its benefits can only be retained by sustained combat. It cannot be claimed by an attorney or solicitor. It is valid only when insisted upon by a belligerent claimant in person. "Without Prejudice" UCC 1-207.4 "All Rights Reserved" When I use "Without Prejudice" UCC 1-207 in connection with my signature, I am saying: "I reserve my right not to be compelled to perform under any contract or commercial agreement that I did not enter knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally. And furthermore, I do not accept the liability of the compelled benefit of any unrevealed contract or commercial agreement." "The Sufficiency of the Reservation: any expression indicating an intention to reserve rights, is sufficient, such as "Without Prejudice" (UCC-1-207-.4) or "All Rights Reserved." "the making of a valid Reservation of Right preserves whatever rights the person then possesses, and prevents the loss of such right by application of concepts of waiver or estoppel." (UCC 1-207.7)
This Document Is Law, and Must Be Obeyed by Anyone Who has a Public Servant Job, and in Particular, Any and All Public Servants Who Have Taken an Oath to Uphold the Constitutions of this state and the united States but shall not be avoided for lack of an oath. Further Authorities: Whereas, the exercise of a natural right needs no authority in America other than the Constitution.
Whereas, Art. 1, Sect. 21 of the Constitution for Oregon, "...nor shall any law be passed, the taking effect of which shall be made to depend upon any authority, except as provided in this Constitution;...". Since this is the underlying principle of all American law upon which Accused is standing, the issue of lawful authority over the body and other properties of Accused cannot be ignored.
Whereas, Accused reserves all rights given him by God and protected by the Constitution for the Republican Union, and the republic of Oregon which places definite and unbridgeable limits upon the law making and enforcement abilities of any government body or corporate entity operating in accordance with and under color of American Law.
Whereas, if the STATE OF OREGON decides to mediate or decide the alleged claim against Accused, Accused reserves and exercises his sovereign power to demand that the STATE OF OREGON and JOSEPHINE COUNTY provide full disclosure of the source of the authority upon which all actions were taken. Full disclosure means; absolute in detail from its source.
Whereas, under American Law, the Accused recognizes that codes, rules and statutes are only administrative in nature and are not the actual Constitutional Laws with proper enacting clauses. Such codes, rules, and statutes, as applied as mandatory obligatory conditions to the Accused, in which the Accused is placed under a legal disability over the objections of the Accused, or thru fraud and deception, is an act of slavery.
Whereas, Accused objects to, and reserves the Right not to be subjected to slavery and reserves all Lawful Rights of redress for any act of slavery imposed upon their person and/or other properties.
Further Notice: Whereas, the STATE OF OREGON operates upon some other system of law other than the Constitutional Common Law in which Accused has Rights secure in the Bill of Rights, Accused demands to know the following: (A) Exactly what system of law is the STATE OF OREGON operating under, (B) What system of law is being used to limit the Rights of Accused, if different from (A), (C) What system of law Accused is being prosecuted for violating, if different from (A), (D) What system of law Accused is being prosecuted under, if different from (A), and (E) How that system of law(s) apply to Accused, who understands himself to be a Man with all the Rights given him by God and protected by the Constitutions for the republic of Oregon and the republican union known as the United States.
Accused reminds the court that there is no "half-pregnant" in the law, and that to deny Accused access to the STATE OF OREGON's and JOSEPHINE COUNTY's law and thereby access to a defense, wherein an obligation such as a debt or service obligation is forced upon Accused is, in law, an act and declaration of slavery against Accused (42 USC, §1994 "...directly or indirectly, the voluntary or involuntary service or labor of any persons as peons, in liquidation of any debt or obligation, or otherwise, are declared null and void.")
Accused further reminds the court that pursuant to law, actors engaged in any form of slavery lose all immunities from criminal prosecution and civil judgments, and any corporation, municipal or otherwise, that condones any act of slavery by any of its agents or employees is subject to civil judgments under the law.
Relief Demanded:
If the court cannot, or will not comply with an American and internationally recognized 'in Law' and commercial law mandate for full disclosure, then Accused demands the court to dismiss its claim upon its own motion because JOSEPHINE COUNTY, thru its representative, failed to state a claim upon which Accused is obligated to grant relief and further failed to state a claim in a court of competent jurisdiction to grant obligatory relief.
Authority:
The Corporate State is moving in its own name in a criminal action and not Ex Rel on behalf of the People of Oregon under and in accordance with the common law.
In the mid 1990's, the State of Oregon, Inc., entered into a commercial enterprise with all of the other State of Oregon public corporations, such as the Oregon State Police, the Department of Transportation, SOSCF, etc. in which the retirement accounts/programs known as the Public Employee Retirement System, (PERS), were combined and invested in the stock market in a for-profit commercial enterprise. As a result: (A) The State of Oregon is no longer operating in its lawfully mandated role as a non-profit public corporation. (B) The State of Oregon judges and the State of Oregon District Attorneys, court administrators, clerks, etc. all have an interest in maintaining the same retirement account.
Furthermore:
A percentage of every fine levied in Oregon, by a State of Oregon court, goes directly into the PERS account. As a result, the District Attorneys office and all of the State of Oregon judges, every Oregon State Police officer, SOSCF worker, etc., have a vested interest in assessing fines and using the State of Oregon's private corporate courts for finding people guilty, as they each acquire personal gain from every conviction.
And Finally:
A percentage of all fines go into the State of Oregon, Inc. general fund upon which the state plans its operating budget, and also, certain administrative agencies, such as the Oregon State Police, get a certain percentage of all fines placed directly into their operating budget.
Therefore:
The State of Oregon is involved in using its courts and jails as tools for an extremely unlawful revenue collection and an undisclosed taxation system.
Accused states that being subjected over his express objections to such a system of codes, rules, statutes and the accompanying enforcement court system is an act of slavery.
Accused again notices everyone that he reserves the God-given and Lawfully protected Right that is endowed upon himself and all Mankind not to be subjected to slavery. Constitution for the united States Art. 3, Sect. 2, Clause 2: "In all cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be a party, the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction."
By____________________________________
Date:______________________
Raymond Ronald Karczewski©
Secured Party/Creditor/Holder in Due Course and Authorized Representative for the Debtor/Defendant RAYMOND RONALD KARCZEWSKI©
Without Prejudice
UCC 1-308
Marilyn LeBaron
Posted by AuntyBLAWGwar on Sunday, November 11, 2007 at 4:30 AM
[Reply to this]
http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=170712420&blogID=322683508&Mytoken=8E04F7F2-BFF7-4F1F-9C8119E808C920AD25896156
Papa
I must play devil's advocate here.
More tools for the system to destroy families.
I'm glad New Jersey's system is moving forward in improvements; but, are more adoptions and more foster parents really the answer?
In my case they had the paperwork done and a family in place for the adoption of my son before I had even went to court. No convictions, no consideration of parental rights, my son went straight into the adoption system and was immediately placed for adoption. My ex-wife's plan was backfiring on her. If I hadn't of had the money, at the time, for a high end attorney, expert opinion and the where with all to immediately become belligerent about my parental rights I would have what little I have now.
So is adding more places for children to go away from their parents an improvement or more tools for the system to destroy families?
Posted by Papa on October 27, 2007 - Saturday at 6:39 AM
[Reply to this]
Groups:
Daily Bible Verse for Myspace , Wesley Clark - Securing America’s Future (official) , 9/11 Truth and Political Activism Portal , Take Back The White House 2008 , U.S. NAVY , Genocide , Ron Paul For President Group , Melting Point
View All MAD-at-CPS's Groups
Online Now!
