On the 30th of September 2007, Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris and Christopher Hitchens sat down for a first-of-its-kind, unmoderated 2-hour discussion, convened by RDFRS and filmed by Josh Timonen.
The Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science presents a DVD collection of 9 speakers from the Atheist Alliance International 2007 Convention (AtheistAlliance.org) held in Washington, D.C. Hear from some of the world's leading rationalists on a variety of subjects including suicide terrorism (Thomson), the Intelligent Deisgn movement (Scott), Islam (Hirsi Ali), church/state separation (Tabash), "The OUT Campaign" and the labeling of children (Dawkins), atheism, religion and much more. Q&A sessions follow most of the talks.
Enjoy this landmark gathering of intellectuals, totalling over 9 hours of video.
This 2-DVD set was shot in HD at 24fps, color corrected, and compressed to DVD. Our audio is from our own high-quality lapel mic setup. This 2-DVD set (glass mastered, professionally manufactured discs with full color jacket and on-disc art, like the other DVDs we've released) include:
About me: Myspace is maintained by volunteers from Richarddawkins.net on behalf of Richard Dawkins. Do not send messages for Richard Dawkins, as they will not get to him.
I have just visited my local branch of Britain’s biggest bookshop chain, and this is what I found: six books on astronomy and nineteen books on astrology. The real science is outnumbered three to one by the pseudoscience. There were twenty books on angels, which means that angels and astrology together (39) outnumber the totality of books on all the sciences (33). When you add in the books on fairies, crystal healing, fortune telling, faith healing, Nostradamus, psychics and dream interpretation, it is no contest. Pseudoscience outnumbers science by at least three to one, and I didn’t even begin to count the far larger number of books on religion. This is not, of course, an academic bookshop. Oxford is well supplied with those, and they’d show a very different result. I made my counts in a popular bookshop, presumably typical of the nationwide chain of which it is a part – indeed, the chain’s buying policy is centralized in London, and we may be sure that strenuous and expensive efforts are made to reflect popular taste. As a statistical generalization, the general public, as opposed to an academic readership, prefers irrational books over books that reflect what we know about the real world.
A recent Gallup poll concluded that nearly 50% of the American public believes the universe is less than 10,000 years old. Nearly half the population, in other words, believes that the entire universe, the sun and solar system, the Milky Way galaxy, the Andromeda galaxy, and all the billions of other galaxies, all began after the domestication of the dog. They believe this because they rate a particular bronze age origin myth more highly than all the scientific evidence in the world. It is only one of literally thousands of such myths from around the world, but it happened, by a series of historical accidents, to become enshrined in a book – Genesis – which, by another series of historical accidents, has been translated and disseminated to almost every home in the land plus – infuriatingly – every hotel room. Even before science told us the true story of the origin of the world and the evolution of life, there was no reason to believe the Jewish origin myth any more than the origin myths of the Yoruba or the Kikuyu, the Yanomamo or the Maori, the Dogon or the Cherokee. Now, in the 21st century as we approach Darwin’s bicentenary, the fact that half of Americans take Genesis literally is nothing less than an educational scandal.
The enlightenment is under threat. So is reason. So is truth. So is science, especially in the schools of America. I am one of those scientists who feels that it is no longer enough just to get on and do science. We have to devote a significant proportion of our time and resources to defending it from deliberate attack from organized ignorance. We even have to go out on the attack ourselves, for the sake of reason and sanity. But it must be a positive attack, for science and reason have so much to give. They are not just useful, they enrich our lives in the same kind of way as the arts do. Promoting science as poetry was one of the things that Carl Sagan did so well, and I aspire to continue his tradition.
Of course, excellent organizations already exist for raising funds and deploying them in the service of reason, science and enlightenment values. In Britain there are the British Humanist Association, the National Secular Society and the Rationalist Press Association, to mention a few. In America there are the Center for Inquiry and the Council for Secular Humanism, the Freedom from Religion Foundation, the James Randi Educational Foundation, and many others. But the money that these organizations can raise is dwarfed by the huge resources of religious foundations such as the Templeton Foundation, not to mention the tithe-bloated, tax-exempt churches.
Over the years, I have given what I could to various secular and rationalist organizations, especially in America where the need is greatest. Unfortunately, however, it is hard for a British citizen to do this in a tax-efficient way. Charities in Britain and America are seldom recognized by the tax authorities on the other side of the Atlantic. Even when they are, the tax systems are different enough in the two countries to make major difficulties. For example, in America it is the donor who reclaims the tax, while in Britain it is the charity that reclaims the donor’s tax for itself.
I started to feel the need for an Anglo-American charity which would cut through these difficulties and facilitate the movement of funds to wherever they are most needed. At the same time it has been increasingly suggested to me that I personally might have some value as a fund raiser, because my books sell well in both countries. Many of my readers are enthusiastic and passionate about science and reason – and some have been kind enough to attribute their enthusiasm and passion to reading my books. Some of these enthusiasts are generous and eager to give, yet some of them might not necessarily think of giving to one of the existing secularist or rationalist charities. Did I not have a duty to set up my own charitable foundation?
My Trustees and I have set up the Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science – RDFRS, or RDF. It is actually two sister foundations of the same name, one legally constituted in Britain and the other legally incorporated in the United States. It has an American trustee based in America (Karen Owens), an American trustee based in Britain (Claire Enders) and a British trustee based in Britain (me). At present, both organizations are companies, with applications for charitable recognition pending in their two countries.
Please visit The Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science website at www.richarddawkins.net
Thank you for being a friend of ABOOKYOUWANT Want to shop ABOOKYOUWANT online? Just follow the link! www. abookyouwant. com We have many books starting out at one cent each. Use the search option to find your favorites.
Good morning. Just thought I should let you know that the Richard Dawkins and Alister McGrath interview as found in the movies section of your profile has been taken off of youtube :)
Thank you so much for the add. I have spent a bit of time on Richard Dawkins website, and I think that one of the things I found that attracted me to it so heavily was the section on religion and abuse/child abuse. As a survivor of such, I truly appreciate the unveiling of children and others that have been damaged physically, mentally, emotionally, and spiritually, by the lunacy of the fantasy of religion.
I come from a town that has a fairly large catholic community (With a fairly small building) and recently a large group of the children were confirmed, not because they wanted to, or because they thought it was a good idea, but because their parents, priest, bishop, etc. wanted them to be Catholic. I'll tell you that before this astonishingly large confirmation, I thought that a large amount of the students in my school were catholic, now with the catholic confirmation the buzz around the school, I've learned that there are alot more than I'd originally assumed. I'd be bold enought to say 1/4. And I know I don't need to tell you that these kids don't really believe any of the shit these places and people tell them, allthough they think they do! They honestly do think that they believe in God and his 'laws' and 'principals'. But all in all, they don't give a damn! And it's not like a confirmation is going to do anything, and the stupid private christian elementary school uses their fascism to turn them into the hypocrites they are. Apparently, many of these kids have been recieving presents and money from their family members to 'celebrate' their confirming. Some of the students whose parents were a little less... I don't know: Rediculous, were complaining that they didn't get their 'confirmation money', because you know that to a 'christian' a few dollars is certainly more important than being confirmed into their faith. See, my town has alot of Catholics, but even more Methodists, so I can't wait until the Methodists have something big and important for their youth....
..
Online Now!
