Termination of Parental Rights -The most basic issues are:
We cannot have Constitutional government if we do not have Constitutional Courts. Roger Weidner
Bureaucrat Protection is not Child Protection Marilyn LeBaron
Announcing Content or Prejudice March
http://cid-0009ccb030dda459. events. live. com/default. aspx
Termination of Parental Rights is Equivalentto the Death Penalty. When one person can walk through your front door, take your children, keep them, bill you too, pass the laws that empower them, and then not give you a grand jury indictment, when a tip from a anonymous person was never faced in open court, while attorneys do not demand trial by jury, and then pass all the statutes, regulations, and policies, which are repugnant and deliberately designed to circumvent, ignore the supreme law, the ones judges swear to uphold and defend, we are caused to loose all our inalienable rights, which defined our citizenship. If we have no citizen ship we have no alliance with our national origin and are in fact alienated to that which is our natural inherent birthright. These violations of our American Due Process Rights are compounded by judges, psychologists, and attorneys violating the Separation of Powers defined in the Federalist Papers Article 86 by being a member of one branch of government that controls the other while gaining the position of god from the opinion of one man.
http://journals. aol. com/blawgwar/blawgwar/
All Rights Reserved
Without Prejudice
UCC 1-308
Marilyn LeBaron
About me: Roger is a native Oregonian, residing in Portland, Oregon. He is a 1956 graduate of Cleveland High School in Portland. He attended Brigham Young University in Provo, Utah in 1956-57.
He joined the army in 1957 and served in the Honor Guard Platoon of the 101st Airborne Division until 1959. At the conclusion of his advanced Airborne infantry training at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, he was designated one of two outstanding trainees in his company of 250 men. Roger returned to Portland, where he graduated in 1963 from Portland State University with a B.S. degree in Business Administration.
He went on to Lewis and Clark Law School, graduating with a J.D. law degree in 1968. While attending college, Roger worked as a full-time Portland City fireman.
DOES THIS SOUND LIKE IT QUALIFIES AS SOCIALIZM?: by Marilyn LeBaron
The Mormon Ranch incident of Nazi Gestapo Invasion was a spectacle and Polk County DHS, 97338, did the same thing to me and my children, then like they did to Greg Pound...
in Florida, came back for the next addition to our family tree...because my dad was a Mormon... because Greg Pound did not get national press attention...
Please send this to all your friends in your Bulletins... Please!!! Telling every one is the only way to get help for vicitms of CPS Abuses...
My daughter was taken and never returned. No Termination...
My daughter was taken and never returned. She came home after she turned 18. They never terminated my parental rights but used a future crime to get two sets of double continuances to get the CPS case in court but the second case was dismissed and they could not prove (a Misdemeanor) that I was obstructing them ADMINISTRATIVELY.
They used the criminal venue (felony) to forward the non criminal venue to get to the thing they dismissed (a Misdemeanor) but never tried me or properly accused me of the felony, which was never dismissed and never set for an arraignment. The higher 'Charge', a felony, fabricated to get to the demand at non crime from Supervisory Staff (forcing a release of information through a Subpoena) to get the lesser (a Misdemeanor), even after they took my daughter with lies never prosecuted in the proper venue. They had to prove the other case first, but only had a preponderance of evidence which is insufficient to do what they did. (end all my parent child relationships).
Technically they gave me a Death Penalty because every bodies kids come home at eighteen when Termination of Parental rights is exacted.
DOES THIS SOUND LIKE IT QUALIFIES AS SOCIALIZM?: by Marilyn LeBaron
The Mormon Ranch incident of Nazi Gestapo Invasion was a spectacle and Polk County DHS, 97338, did the same thing to me and my children, then like they did to Greg Pound in Florida, came back for the next addition to our family tree...because my dad was a Mormon... because Greg Pound did not get national press attention...
Please send this to all your friends in your Bulletins... Please!!! Telling every one is the only way to get help for vicitms of CPS Abuses...
My daughter was taken and never returned. No Termination...
My daughter was taken and never returned. She came home after she turned 18. They never terminated my parental rights but used a future crime to get two sets of double continuances to get the CPS case in court but the second case was dismissed and they could not prove (a Misdemeanor) that I was obstructing them ADMINISTRATIVELY.
They used the criminal venue (felony) to forward the non criminal venue to get to the thing they dismissed (a Misdemeanor) but never tried me or properly accused me of the felony, which was never dismissed and never set for an arraignment. The higher 'Charge', a felony, fabricated to get to the demand at non crime from Supervisory Staff (forcing a release of information through a Subpoena) to get the lesser (a Misdemeanor), even after they took my daughter with lies never prosecuted in the proper venue. They had to prove the other case first, but only had a preponderance of evidence which is insufficient to do what they did. (end all my parent child relationships).
Technically they gave me a Death Penalty because every bodies kids come home at eighteen when Termination of Parental rights is exacted.
Re: Foster Care Fraud Thomas_Alexander_Bleu_LeBaron_&_Melanie_LeBaron_&_Me_SMPq.docx
From: securemailer.d-78099-9vh8qvrv@secureemail.hr.state.or.us on behalf of INFO Dhs (Dhs.Info@state.or.us) Sent: Fri 6/13/08 11:59 AM Reply-to: INFO Dhs (Dhs.Info@state.or.us) To: gomadcowgo@hotmail.com
You have received a secure message from DHSINFO@DHS.STATE.OR.US entitled, "Re: Foster Care Fraud".
You may view the message (before 07/13/2008) at the following web address:
To block this app and all communications from it, click Here.
-------------------------------------------
AuntyBLAWGwar just sent you a Slideshow! Click here to view the show
RULE 53 REFORM video for judicial accountability titled 'The Andy Simrin and Friends UCRCoA', Wednesday, June 18, 2008 Link to LeBaron Family Political Complaint
A Posted Reply to Sherri Yoakum, Ombudsman,
Governor's Advocacy and Children's Ombudsman Office Department of Human Services 1-800-442-5238 DHS.INFO@state.or.us
[For Publication]
Delivered to Secure Mailbox: securemailer.d-78099-9vh8qvrv@secureemail.hr.state.or.us
When one person can walk through your front door, take your children, keep them, bill you too, pass the laws that empower them, and then not give you a grand jury indictment, when a tip from a anonymous person was never faced in open court, while attorneys do not demand trial by jury, and then pass all the statutes, regulations, and policies, which are repugnant and deliberately designed to circumvent, ignore the supreme law, the ones judges swear to uphold and defend, we are caused to loose all our inalienable rights, which defined our citizenship.
If we have no citizenship we have no alliance with our national origin and are in fact alienated to that which is our natural inherent birthright.
Please join me in my Blog movement and post anywhere you can find the space. Here is my group on RULE 53 REFORM:
Marion County has solved the issue but I don't get to pull the 'same trick' Zack got by using an Ex Parte Motion for a Status Quo ... but I get to see my son any time I want now (which rules out any possible allegation that I am in any way an eminent threat against my children)! -When have I ever been? Please demand to see the physical proof, the evidence against me... I beg... please find an exhibit of an eminent threat against my children logged in the Dallas DHS Office at 177 SW Oak, Dallas, Oregon, 97338, on the dates of January 10, 2005, to January 20, 2005, and then go see where it is logged on January 25, 2005, and demand the reason given to Chandra Snyder which was 'logged' in a timely manner (the supervisory extensions I requested in my attempt for Discovery). Please compare that documentation, 'if any', to what was said in the supervisory meeting held on February 14th, 2005 in support of the fax sent to Zachariah B. Singleton on February 08, 2005. This fax was never mailed to me by CERTIFIED MAIL RECIEPT REQUESTED as OAR Require for a FOUNDED disposition which is a violation of my right to a refute at the earliest stage of an investigation (Sound Police Investigation) ... I got this fax off the front door of Zachariah Singleton's home in Redmond when I went to pick my son up intending to go have a Birthday Party we never go to have... The Birthday parties 'in' my home have never been the same… which is worse than the broken arm I was promised… I left a balloon I brought with me at the Redmond address and looked back at the porch and drove away… This was the last times I got to contact my son before I knew I would be headed for the night mare of my life... because that fax was a lie and I knew deep down 'liars keep telling lies' and my soul screamed, "You will probably never see Bleu again"... I wondered how far they would go to put me in my proper place while I demanded justice...
See: Parent Alienation Syndrome and Special Position in Society
Why does the State of Oregon get the Special Place in our Power Structure to Alienate Parents from their children for non criminal allegation never brought to trial? Why do Judges hear in closed quarters allegation never presented to the parent accused of less that a misdemeanor never having those allegations brought to 'non justice'?… Does my demand for Due Process qualify as Civil Disobedience or Contempt of Court? Certainly not Obstruction of Justice? How do I get non tried for ADMINISTATIVE INTERFEREENCE and having those 'charges' dropped but the State at Judge Luukinen's motion CONSOLIDATE the matters twice one not having bearing on the other when it is dismissed.
Please tell me what message Polk County Judiciary are sending the American people and what would a jury say... if I had one the matter not intended for their deliberation… Friday, June 20, 2008
This is what a refute looks like: See: Affidavit of Special Visitation.
Master Example can be found in the CPS (free) HANDBOOK
I did not know any thing about how to file a refute when my case was going on and this refute has to be filed at the first Appearance in court (like the day after they take your kids and get a 'Dependency Hearing')..., where you get no arraignment, yet facing the equivalent of a Death Penalty on a non criminal allegation... (non crime) is where you non'face a non accuser's (n'allegation) ... it is not subject to a Grand Jury Indictment, 'it is Family Law', but you can get the equivalent of getting the electic chair and never have to take a seat or have a sponge shoved in your mouth. That is what was going on in what we once called America but I call our problems Amer-ee-ka (the Defacto).
All the times I went to court and did not know a thing... but I just knew 'my head' was 'chopped off somehow'...
See: O5P2064 and O5P2176, Judge Horner, Singleton v. LeBaron and 'vise versa'...
The Consolidation Move that threw out Due Process by Judge Luukinen? (if he would give me the same consideration he would ask for his own defense...if he was facing the hangmans knoose, next to Judge William M. Horner, Marion L. Fleming, Fred E. Avera, and other's like them... in Florida and California... Like all those on Julie A Witherspoons case... Oh, and Judge Sullivan, too.) Oh, well what about all the rest of them who dole out the equivalent of Death Sentences ignoring the possible slogan... "No Grand Jury Indictment, No Jury Trial Needed"... Please See "No Due Process, No Charges Possible"... Well, lets see if they ageee they need a Grand Jury Indictment if we threaten them with Impeachment Nationwide!
...while another… Judge Avera (*Avery) ignored my motion for Full Disclosure,
This is a RULE 53 REFORM matter
Luukinen saying, ..."Get an Attorney or get a broken arm", at the 'CONSOLIDATION' hearing, for O5P2064/O5P2176, which was never CONSOLIDATED ... he understating the full consequences while he should have said, "Don't you dare say, 'Constitution' -Judge Horner will 'lop your head off' instantly for that!" "You are always seen as WARD OF THE COURT here in Polk County!" That is what he should have said instead of ... the equivalent... "Your going to need a cast on 'your' arm"... looking from me to my opponent ... indicating he only sees the 'parents as the people needing 'medical attention' for what was to come next... he failing to see the out come, the future, the lies, the violations of Supreme Court Rule... thee 'A home can not me made in a day' decision... That Supreme Court decision, was, on Good Faith, violated by Judge Sullivan of Deschutes County, (somebody whispered allegations in his ear never presented to me for a rebuttal...) and Judge Sullivan, who on the word of UNABLE TO DETERMINE, said I could not see my son (at all) ... This was handed down in a Status Quo to a man my son barley knew (who abandon him, was a dead beat dad for over eight years, hiding never telling me his address even when he did make contact through his relatives to peek at his son, and never did a single thing about all the 'stuff' he had to say about my abilities as a mother, he telling the Child Support Division, "My son was living in the back of a truck" while trying to deny his fatherhood...)
This UNABLE TO DETERMINE gone (EMERGENCY!!!!) was upheld by Judge Horner, too, because Judges do that 'back each other up', but, Judge Sullivan handed down the unofficial ...'No Contact Order'... in a Status Quo which usually is implemented while intending to keep the child's schedule 'the same' hence Status Quo, as before, abusing the legislated intent for that document&183; My son did not keep his schedule his 'Life' got ripped apart! His parent child bond torn up on Good Faith .... e-hem... 5 days before the 'Staff over in Polk County' ... the ones whispering in judicial ears... formally held a meeting, a very illegal meeting, to say, later in letters to me... "We would have found this case FOUNDED, when there was no Police Investigation or any demands for evidence or doctor visits on the allegation in the Fax ... No family unity meeting... No mediation... No REGISTERED LETTERS to say FOUNDED. Just, "We have no Teeth" in the formal interview ( held at the Juvenile Department at the request of ... ? on January 20, 2005) ... I notified of this meeting on January 13, 2005 by Matt L. Hawkins who was handed the telephone by Officer Banuelos... that same day the CPS Agent' said, No Police Needed'… and then some the CPS showed up at that meeting... January 20, 2005, where the only concern directly 'voiced' was, "I'm concerned... you can't follow a conversation" ... being the only direct allegation voiced... in response to my request for verbal discovery in order for me to have my rights upheld... and when I proved she was wrong they diagnosed me and took my daughter away from me... (the next case brought against me), ...all the but covering for Horner ... Sullivan... and the DHS... Please: See: MOTION FOR TELEPHONIC TESTIMONY... Please put a stop to 'prosecution for non crime' on the future attack of public officials...
TAKE A LOOK AT WHAT OTHER JUDGES DO IN FLORIDA TO GET AN IDEA OF WHAT GOES ON ALL OVER THE 'Home of the brave 'land of the free (FREE)'...
Greg Pound got the equivalent of 4 Death Penalty Sentences form that same judge Marion L Fleming See: YouTube - Greg Pound www. freeourkids. com
Headline: Marion L. Fleming's Death Threats 4 states
http://www. sptimes. com/letters/ -----Original Message----- From: MADatCPS@aol.com To: xxxxxxxx Cc: xxxxxx; xxxxxxxx; xxxxxxxx Sent: Mon, 26 May 2008 9:52 pm
Subject: Dear CPS Victim, xxxxxxxxxx, Mr. A, Mr. C, & Person C, Dear Melissa, Mr. A, Mr. C, & Person C,
Help is on the way.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sovereign American To: MADatCPS@aol.com Sent: Mon, 26 May 2008 11:01 am Subject: Re: Fwd: Kids pics in database. Brianna has since been removed
The same CPS nonsense you are going through happened in Texas. The process paid off for the compound mothers because they had good assistance and could file properly.
Lawyers are important, but I have not found even one. The UCC in now before the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Vermont. The most important issue is process of the court. The language in UCC 3-501 (b) (2) and (3) have never been answered by any court.
District Courts have an easy out at 28 USC 636 (c), but the court goes ahead anyway and forces an appeal. Also, they do not "Seal and teste Process" per 28 USC 1691. The judge cannot give "dispositive"/jural orders because he is an Article I judge and not jural at Article III.
Each state has their own rules concerning process and you should study your state. Very important because (3) (i) return the instrument for lack of a necessary indorsement, is part of process. A type written name at the bottom of an injunction invalidates the instrument. This is also 28 USC 1691.
Lawyers do not study this material or use it in court. Good hunting. Psalm 25:9.
--- MADatCPS@aol.com wrote:
Thanks for all your help William. CPS Victim, xxxxxxxxxx is making it work!
All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice UCC 1-308 Marilyn LeBaron
-----Original Message----- From: CPS Victim, xxxxxxxxxx To: blawg_war@yahoo.com Sent: Sun, 25 May 2008 9:30 pm
Subject: Fwd: Kids pics in database. Brianna has since been removed
-----Original Message-----
This false listing (by itself) is one civil right (42 USC Section 1983) Count for Malicious Prosecution---also a violation of 42 USC Sec.
-----Original Message----- From: Sovereign American To: MADatCPS@aol.com Sent: Mon, 26 May 2008 10:16 am Subject: Re: Fwd: Affidavit of Special Visitation Dear CPS Victim, xxxxxxxxxx, Go for it. This lawyer will ask the hard questions and is badly needed because they know the form and system. I will help her anyway I can. "Don't sleep on it. "
Sovereign American
--- MADatCPS@aol.com wrote Fwd: Affidavit of Special Visitation
-----Original Message----- From: xxxxxxxx To: CPS Victim, xxxxxxxxxx Sent: Sun, 25 May 2008 4:53 pm Subject: Fw: Affidavit of Special Visitation Dear CPS Victim, xxxxxxxxxx:
If you can get me $2,500 immediately and a total of $12,500 eventually (doesn't really matter when, but the total sometime by the end of this year or early next year), I think I can convert this affidavit into a $2. 5 million lawsuit with excellent chances of winning and having it upheld. I AM a disbarred attorney, but I can still do all or most of the footwork for you UNTIL Court appearances are necessary, but I also think I can get this organized as a case that some high profile national lawyers (e.g. from Harvard, where I'm planning on spending the summer) may be willing to step in. ? Your case is truly outrageous. ? I'll also work with your public defender in Pinellas and can travel anywhere in the U.S. that it might be necessary to help you prepare the evidence.
Call me if you're interested....but you don't want to sleep on this. ? If you don't want me to do it because of my status and background, please shop it around to other lawyers.....Your situation and status are amazing. ? I know a State Senator from Montana whose got a very similar story.... and he's become one of the top legal reform advocates in the U.S.
CEL
-----Original Message----- From: CPS Victim, xxxxxxxxxx To: xxxxxx Date:Sun, 9 Mar 2008 23:35:42 -0700 (PDT) From:"xxxxxxxxx" Subject: Affidavit of Special Visitation
AFFIDAVIT of SPECIAL VISITATION
? ?
KNOW ALL MEN AND WOMEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that Affiant, Name of affiant, a natural living, breathing, man on the land being of sound mind and FIRST BEING DULY SWORN, willfully and voluntarily deposes and says, and as ADMINISTRATIVE NOTICE:
?
a) I, CPS Victim, xxxxxxxxxx, am competent to handle matters and for stating the matters set forth herein and all matters must be expressed to be resolved.
?
b) I, CPS Victim, xxxxxxxxxx, have personal kno wledge concerning the facts stated herein.
?
c) All the facts stated herein are true, correct, complete, and certain, not misleading, made in good faith, admissible as evidence, and if stating as I, CPS Victim, xxxxxxxxxx, shall so state.
?
FACT EXAMPLES HERE
?
FACT: Affiant is not in receipt of any law, which would deprive affiant or family of any Rights guaranteed under the Constitution of the United States of America, which would force compliance or demand that we incriminate ourselves.
?
FACT: Affiant is not in receipt of evidence, which demonstrates that there are exigent circumstances relative to the health of the children.
?
FACT: Affiant is not a defendant in any action pending review, nor is Affiant standing as the accused in a criminal action.
?
FACT: Affiant is not in receipt of any document which purports to prove that CPS Victim, xxxxxxxxxx, is willfully meriting contempt or dishonorably disobeying a lawful court order.
?
FACT: Affiant is not in receipt of any lawful court order with Seal and teste of process affixed thereto.
?
FACT: Affiant is not in receipt of any document that absent consent, a warrant, probable cause, or exigent circumstances, is not an unreasonable search and seizure and in violation My NAME and MY CHILDS NAME. [1]
? ?
FACT. Affiant is not in receipt of any document which purports to claim that I CPS Victim, xxxxxxxxxx, am not
All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice UCC 1-308 Marilyn LeBaron
To: Innocence Project Sent: Mon, 26 May 2008 11:18 pm Subject: Fwd: Marion L. Fleming's Death Threats 4 states 3:46 PM - 1 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment - Edit - Remove
Tuesday, April 22, 2008 The fourth Sunday in July is Parents’ Day.
Category: Life
§ 135. Parents' Day
(a) Designation.— The fourth Sunday in July is Parents' Day.
(b) Recognition.— All private citizens, organizations, and Federal, State, and local governmental and legislative entities are encouraged to recognize Parents' Day through proclamations, activities, and educational efforts in furtherance of recognizing, uplifting, and supporting the role of parents in bringing up their children.
Marion County has solved the issue but I don't get to pull the 'same trick' Zack got by using an Ex Parte Motion for a Status Quo ... but I get to see my son any time I want now (which rules out any possible allegation that I am in any way an eminent threat against my children)! -When have I ever been? Please demand to see the physical proof, the evidence against me... I beg... please find an exhibit of an eminent threat against my children logged in the Dallas DHS Office at 177 SW Oak, Dallas, Oregon, 97338, on the dates of January 10, 2005, to January 20, 2005, and then go see where it is logged on January 25, 2005, and demand the reason given to Chandra Snyder which was 'logged' in a timely manner (the supervisory extensions I requested in my attempt for Discovery). Please compare that documentation, 'if any', to what was said in the supervisory meeting held on February 14th, 2005 in support of the fax sent to Zachariah B. Singleton on February 08, 2005. This fax was never mailed to me by CERTIFIED MAIL RECIEPT REQUESTED as OAR Require for a FOUNDED disposition which is a violation of my right to a refute at the earliest stage of an investigation (Sound Police Investigation) ... I got this fax off the front door of Zachariah Singleton's home in Redmond when I went to pick my son up intending to go have a Birthday Party we never go to have... The Birthday parties ‘in’ my home have never been the same… which is worse than the broken arm I was promised… I left a balloon I brought with me at the Redmond address and looked back at the porch and drove away… This was the last times I got to contact my son before I knew I would be headed for the night mare of my life... because that fax was a lie and I knew deep down 'liars keep telling lies' and my soul screamed, “You will probably never see Bleu again”... I wondered how far they would go to put me in my proper place while I demanded justice...
See: Parent Alienation Syndrome and Special Position in Society
Why does the State of Oregon get the Special Place in our Power Structure to Alienate Parents from their children for non criminal allegation never brought to trial? Why do Judges hear in closed quarters allegation never presented to the parent accused of less that a misdemeanor never having those allegations brought to ‘non justice’?… Does my demand for Due Process qualify as Civil Disobedience or Contempt of Court? Certainly not Obstruction of Justice? How do I get non tried for ADMINISTATIVE INTERFEREENCE and having those ‘charges’ dropped but the State at Judge Luukinen’s motion CONSOLIDATE the matters twice one not having bearing on the other when it is dismissed.
Please tell me what message Polk County Judiciary are sending the American people and what would a jury say if I had on the matter not intended for their consideration…
Friday, June 20, 2008 This is what a refute looks like: See: Affidavit of Special Visitation.
Category: Podcast This is what a refute looks like: See: Affidavit of Special Visitation.
Master Example can be found in the CPS (free) HANDBOOK I did not know any thing about how to file a refute when my case was going on and this refute has to be filed at the first Appearance in court (like the day after they take your kids and get a 'Dependency Hearing', where you get no arraignment while facing the equivalent of a Death Penalty on a non criminal allegation... that is what was going on all the times I went to court and did not know a thing... but know my head was 'chopped off somehow'... See: O5P2064 and O5P2176, Judge Horner, Singleton v. LeBaron and 'vise versa'... The Consolidation Move that threw out Due Process by Judge Luukinen ...while another… Judge Avera (*Avery) ignored my motion for Full Disclosure, This is a RULE 53 REFORM matter Luukinen saying, ..."Get an Attorney or get a broken arm", at the 'CONSOLIDATION' hearing, for O5P2064/O5P2176, which was never CONSOLIDATED ... he understating the full consequences while he should have said, "Don't you dare say Constitution Judge Horner will 'lop your head off' instantly for that", you are always seen as WARD OF THE COURT here in Polk County!" That is what he should have said instead of ... "Your going to need a cast on 'your' arm"... looking from my to my opponent ... indicating he only sees the 'parents at the people needing 'medical attention' for what was to come next... he failing to see the out come, the future, the lies, the violations of Supreme Court Rule... the 'A home can not me made in a day' decision... That Supreme Court decision, was, on Good Faith, violated by Judge Sullivan of Deschutes County, (somebody whispered allegations in his ear never presented to me for a rebuttal... and Judge Sullivan, who on the word of UNABLE TO DETERMINE, said I could not see my son (at all) ... This was handed down in a Status Quo to a man my son barley knew (who abandon him and was a dead beat dad for over eight years hiding never telling me his address even when he did make contact through his relatives to peek at his son...) This UNABLE TO DETERMINE gone (EMERGENCY) was upheld by Judge Horner, too, because Judges do that 'back each other up', but, Judge Sullivan handed down the unofficial ...'No Contact Order'... in a Status Quo which usually is implemented while intending to keep the child's schedule 'the same' hence Status Quo, as before, abusing the legislated intent for that document&183; My son did not keep his schedule his 'Life' got ripped apart! His parent child bond torn up on Good Faith .... e-hem... 5 days before the 'Staff over in Polk County' ... the ones whispering in judicial ears... formally held a meeting, a very illegal meeting, to say, later in letters to me... "We would have found this case FOUNDED, when there was no Police Investigation or any demands for evidence or doctor visits on the allegation in the Fax ... No family unity meeting... No mediation... No REGISTERED LETTERS to say FOUNDED. Just, "We have no Teeth" in the formal interview ( held at the Juvenile Department at the request of ... ? on January 20, 2005) ... I notified of this meeting on January 13, 2005 by Matt L. Hawkins who was handed the telephone by Officer Banuelos... that same day the CPS Agent' said, No Police Needed'… and then some the CPS showed up at that meeting... January 20, 2005, where the only concern directly 'voiced' was, "I'm concerned... you can't follow a conversation" ... being the only direct allegation voiced... in response to my request for verbal discovery in order for me to have my rights upheld... and when I proved she was wrong they diagnosed me and took my daughter away from me... (the next case brought against me), ...all the but covering for Horner ... Sullivan... and the DHS... Please: See: MOTION FOR TELEPHONIC TESTIMONY... Please put a stop to 'prosecution for non crime' on the future attack of public officials... TAKE A LOOK AT WHAT OTHER JUDGES DO IN FLORIDA TO GET AN IDEA OF WHAT GOES ON ALL OVER THE 'Home of the brave 'land of the free (FREE)'... ............................sos....................sos...............sos..................sos................. Greg Pound got the equivalent of 4 Death Penalty Sentences form that same judge Marion L Fleming See: YouTube - Greg Pound Headline: Marion L. Fleming's Death Threats 4 states http://www. sptimes. com/letters/
-----Original Message----- From: MADatCPS@aol.com To: xxxxxxxx Cc: xxxxxx; xxxxxxxx; xxxxxxxx Sent: Mon, 26 May 2008 9:52 pm Subject: Dear CPS Victim, xxxxxxxxxx, Mr. A, Mr. C, & Person C, Dear Melissa, Mr. A, Mr. C, & Person C, Help is on the way.
-----Original Message----- From: Sovereign American To: MADatCPS@aol.com Sent: Mon, 26 May 2008 11:01 am Subject: Re: Fwd: Kids pics in database. Brianna has since been removed
The same CPS nonsense you are going through happened in Texas. The process paid off for the compound mothers because they had good assistance and could file properly.
Lawyers are important, but I have not found even one. The UCC in now before the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Vermont. The most important issue is process of the court. The language in UCC 3-501 (b) (2) and (3) have never been answered by any court.
District Courts have an easy out at 28 USC 636 (c), but the court goes ahead anyway and forces an appeal. Also, they do not "Seal and teste Process" per 28 USC 1691. The judge cannot give "dispositive"/jural orders because he is an Article I judge and not jural at Article III.
Each state has their own rules concerning process and you should study your state. Very important because (3) (i) return the instrument for lack of a necessary indorsement, is part of process. A type written name at the bottom of an injunction invalidates the instrument. This is also 28 USC 1691.
Lawyers do not study this material or use it in court. Good hunting. Psalm 25:9.
--- MADatCPS@aol.com wrote: Thanks for all your help William. CPS Victim, xxxxxxxxxx is making it work! All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice UCC 1-308 Marilyn LeBaron
-----Original Message----- From: CPS Victim, xxxxxxxxxx To: blawg_war@yahoo.com Sent: Sun, 25 May 2008 9:30 pm Subject: Fwd: Kids pics in database. Brianna has since been removed -----Original Message----- This false listing (by itself) is one civil right (42 USC Section 1983) Count for Malicious Prosecution---also a violation of 42 USC Sec.
All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice UCC 1-308 Marilyn LeBaron -----Original Message----- From: Sovereign American To: MADatCPS@aol.com Sent: Mon, 26 May 2008 10:16 am Subject: Re: Fwd: Affidavit of Special Visitation
Dear CPS Victim, xxxxxxxxxx,
Go for it. This lawyer will ask the hard questions and is badly needed because they know the form and system. I will help her anyway I can. "Don't sleep on it. " Sovereign American --- MADatCPS@aol.com wrote: Fwd: Affidavit of Special Visitation -----Original Message----- From: xxxxxxxx To: CPS Victim, xxxxxxxxxx Sent: Sun, 25 May 2008 4:53 pm Subject: Fw: Affidavit of Special Visitation Dear CPS Victim, xxxxxxxxxx: If you can get me $2,500 immediately and a total of $12,500 eventually (doesn't really matter when, but the total sometime by the end of this year or early next year), I think I can convert this affidavit into a $2. 5 million lawsuit with excellent chances of winning and having it upheld. I AM a disbarred attorney, but I can still do all or most of the footwork for you UNTIL Court appearances are necessary, but I also think I can get this organized as a case that some high profile national lawyers (e.g. from Harvard, where I'm planning on spending the summer) may be willing to step in. ? Your case is truly outrageous. ? I'll also work with your public defender in Pinellas and can travel anywhere in the U.S. that it might be necessary to help you prepare the evidence.
Call me if you're interested....but you don't want to sleep on this. ? If you don't want me to do it because of my status and background, please shop it around to other lawyers.....Your situation and status are amazing. ? I know a State Senator from Montana whose got a very similar story.... and he's become one of the top legal reform advocates in the U.S.
CEL -----Original Message----- From: CPS Victim, xxxxxxxxxx To: xxxxxx Date:Sun, 9 Mar 2008 23:35:42 -0700 (PDT) From:"xxxxxxxxx" Subject: Affidavit of Special Visitation AFFIDAVIT of SPECIAL VISITATION ? ? KNOW ALL MEN AND WOMEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that Affiant, Name of affiant, a natural living, breathing, man on the land being of sound mind and FIRST BEING DULY SWORN, willfully and voluntarily deposes and says, and as ADMINISTRATIVE NOTICE: ? a) I, CPS Victim, xxxxxxxxxx, am competent to handle matters and for stating the matters set forth herein and all matters must be expressed to be resolved.
? b) I, CPS Victim, xxxxxxxxxx, have personal kno wledge concerning the facts stated herein.
? c) All the facts stated herein are true, correct, complete, and certain, not misleading, made in good faith, admissible as evidence, and if stating as I, CPS Victim, xxxxxxxxxx, shall so state.
? FACT EXAMPLES HERE ? FACT: Affiant is not in receipt of any law, which would deprive affiant or family of any Rights guaranteed under the Constitution of the United States of America, which would force compliance or demand that we incriminate ourselves.
? FACT: Affiant is not in receipt of evidence, which demonstrates that there are exigent circumstances relative to the health of the children.
? FACT: Affiant is not a defendant in any action pending review, nor is Affiant standing as the accused in a criminal action.
? FACT: Affiant is not in receipt of any document which purports to prove that CPS Victim, xxxxxxxxxx, is willfully meriting contempt or dishonorably disobeying a lawful court order.
? FACT: Affiant is not in receipt of any lawful court order with Seal and teste of process affixed thereto.
? FACT: Affiant is not in receipt of any document that absent consent, a warrant, probable cause, or exigent circumstances, is not an unreasonable search and seizure and in violation My NAME and MY CHILDS NAME. [1] ? ? FACT. Affiant is not in receipt of any document which purports to claim that I CPS Victim, xxxxxxxxxx, am not === message truncated === Sovereign American http://godissovereignfast. com/ To purchase Without Prejudice UCC 1-207; go to http://www. 1stbooks. com/bookview/20674
When one person can walk through your front door, take your children, keep them, bill you too, pass the laws that empower them, and then not give you a grand jury indictment, when a tip from a anonymous person was never faced in open court, while attorneys do not demand trial by jury, and then pass all the statutes, regulations, and policies, which are repugnant and deliberately designed to circumvent, ignore the supreme law, the ones judges swear to uphold and defend, we are caused to loose all our inalienable rights, which defined our citizenship.
If we have no citizenship we have no alliance with our national origin and are in fact alienated to that which is our natural inherent birthright.
Please join me in my Blog movement and post anywhere you can find the space. Here is my group on RULE 53 REFORM:
The SOCIA WORKER was judge and jury... People that resisted politaclly got put to death. Here today we just get the equivalent by political retaliation.
Published by Daniel T. Weaver on Jun 01, 2008 Category: Government/Law Region: United States of America Target: State of Texas Web site: http://upstreamzine. wordpress. com
------------------------------- This comment was sent by your friend via the Own Your Friends! application. To block comments sent via Apps.
The SOCIA WORKER was judge and jury... People that resisted politaclly got put to death. Here today we just get the equivalent by political retaliation.
Published by Daniel T. Weaver on Jun 01, 2008 Category: Government/Law Region: United States of America Target: State of Texas Web site: http://upstreamzine. wordpress. com
------------------------------- This comment was sent by your friend via the Own Your Friends! application. To block comments sent via Apps.
The SOCIA WORKER was judge and jury... People that resisted politaclly got put to death. Here today we just get the equivalent by political retaliation.
Published by Daniel T. Weaver on Jun 01, 2008 Category: Government/Law Region: United States of America Target: State of Texas Web site: http://upstreamzine. wordpress. com
------------------------------- This comment was sent by your friend via the Bumper Stickers application. To block comments sent via Apps.
The SOCIA WORKER was judge and jury... People that resisted politaclly got put to death. Here today we just get the equivalent by political retaliation.
Published by Daniel T. Weaver on Jun 01, 2008 Category: Government/Law Region: United States of America Target: State of Texas Web site: <a href="http://www. msplinks. com/MDFod
Gov't Accountability: Holding judges, social workers, prosecutors, police officers, and all other types of government employees, and government agencies, responsible to their duty to support, protect, and defend the United States Constitution, and all it stands for, is paramount to achieve, if you want to return America back into a free country. Because the bar associations are essentially like the government, as respects upholding of our basic civil liberties and due process rights, methods of holding lawyers accountable are also included within the scope of this Focus Area.
