Showing Ed and Elaine Brown Supporters the Law
Showing Ed and Elaine Brown Supporters the Law
96 歲
WASHINGTON, Washington DC
美國



上次登入時間: 2009/9/5
檢視我的: 圖片

   連絡 Showing Ed and Elaine Brown Supporters the Law

 MySpace 網址: 

     Showing Ed and Elaine Brown Supporters the Law 的詳細資訊
狀態:單身
來這裡是為了:社交
家鄉:Washington, DC
體型:微胖
星座:天秤座
收入:300,000 以上



Showing Ed and Elaine Brown Supporters the Law 已在你的延伸網路中
檢視更多

Showing Ed and Elaine Brown Supporters the Law 的最新部落文章  [訂閱部落格]

[檢視所有部落文章標題]

   Showing Ed and Elaine Brown Supporters the Law 的自我介紹
關於我:

Hello. My name is the Internal Revenue Code. I am a compilation of code sections that were passed into law by Congress and the President with updates and changes since I was first born on October 3, 1913.

I get my authority from the US Constitution.

Article I, § 8, cl. 1 The Congress shall have power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises ... but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States

Article I, § 2, cl. 3 Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers

Article I, § 9, cl. 4 No Capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in proportion to the Census or Enumeration herein before directed to be taken.

In the early 1900s, the American public pushed politicians hard for the passage of an income tax since the prior system of tariffs was viewed as oppressive and unfair to working class citizens. If the only things Congress wanted to tax were wages and personal earnings, no change was needed to the Constitution, since such items were never subject to apportionment. But to pass an income tax that was more comprehensive, the 16th Amendment was proposed.

The 16th Amendment simply removed the apportionment requirement for certain types of income tax. In other words, it didn't give Congress a new power to tax, it simply took away one of the restrictions.

16th Amendment  The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.

Now the here's the law that make Ed liable.

§ 1. Tax imposed - There is hereby imposed on the taxable income of every individual ... a tax determined in accordance with the following table.
§ 63.  Taxable income defined - the term "taxable income" means gross income minus the deductions allowed by this chapter.
§ 61.  Gross income defined - gross income means all income from whatever source derived, including (but not limited to) the following items:
(1) Compensation for services, including fees, commissions, fringe benefits, and similar items;
(2) Gross income derived from business;
(3) Gains derived from dealings in property;
(4) Interest;
(5) Rents;
(6) Royalties;
(7) Dividends;
(8) Alimony and separate maintenance payments;
(9) Annuities;
(10) Income from life insurance and endowment contracts;
(11) Pensions;
(12) Income from discharge of indebtedness;
(13) Distributive share of partnership gross income;
(14) Income in respect of a decedent; and
(15) Income from an interest in an estate or trust.

It really is that simple.

Still have questions?

You can read more about the urban legends and myths surround the Code here:

Tax Protester Frequently Asked Questions

And here's a history of the tax laws in the United States:

The Tax History Museum

And for those of you who bought into the nonsense that the 16th Amendment was never ratified, it was:

Wikipedia

If you really think that typos and differing spellings prevent an amendment from being ratified, then the Bill of Rights was never ratified either, so forget about free speech, guns, and due process.

我想認識:
People who respect the checks and balances in the Constitution. I, the Internal Revenue Code, can be changed or even eliminated entirely at any time by the US Congress. Those who self decide the law rather than work within the Constitutional system to change it are not patriots.

Hint: If you want to remove the Constitutional authority to tax wages and personal income, simply eliminating the 16th Amendment won't change a thing. You'd have to amend the core of the Constitution itself since the Founding Fathers gave Congress a broad taxing power.


   Showing Ed and Elaine Brown Supporters the Law 的好友空間 (前 1)
Showing Ed and Elaine Brown Supporters the Law 共有 1 位好友。
 Tom 





Showing Ed and Elaine Brown Supporters the Law 的好友留言
新增留言


©2003-2009 MySpace.com。保留所有權利。